GAME ANALYSIS

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

SAC Sacramento Kings
S Nique Clifford 38.1m
18
pts
5
reb
5
ast
Impact
-4.3

Cold perimeter shooting and empty possessions during key stretches sabotaged a heavy-workload performance. He provided solid defensive resistance, but his erratic shot selection from beyond the arc stalled out the offensive flow.

Shooting
FG 8/16 (50.0%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 56.3%
USG% 20.7%
Net Rtg -23.5
+/- -19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.1m
Offense +9.5
Hustle +3.5
Defense +4.7
Raw total +17.7
Avg player in 38.1m -22.0
Impact -4.3
How is this calculated?
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 3
S Devin Carter 36.4m
21
pts
5
reb
5
ast
Impact
-6.5

A complete inability to connect from deep severely cramped the floor and damaged his net impact. He found success attacking the interior, but those 0-for-5 blanks from the perimeter resulted in empty trips that fueled opponent runs.

Shooting
FG 8/14 (57.1%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 5/9 (55.6%)
Advanced
TS% 58.5%
USG% 23.3%
Net Rtg -16.7
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.4m
Offense +8.5
Hustle +3.1
Defense +2.8
Raw total +14.4
Avg player in 36.4m -20.9
Impact -6.5
How is this calculated?
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 3
S Maxime Raynaud 33.2m
11
pts
15
reb
2
ast
Impact
-2.1

Tremendous rebounding volume and rim protection were completely undone by clunky offensive execution. Missed bunnies in the paint and likely transition-starting turnovers dragged his net score into the red despite his dominant physical presence.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 42.7%
USG% 18.1%
Net Rtg -17.0
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.2m
Offense +6.9
Hustle +2.0
Defense +8.1
Raw total +17.0
Avg player in 33.2m -19.1
Impact -2.1
How is this calculated?
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
8
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.0

Poor positional awareness on the defensive end severely punished his overall rating. While he managed a few efficient finishes inside, his inability to anchor the paint or deter dribble penetration gave all that value right back.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/6 (33.3%)
Advanced
TS% 46.3%
USG% 21.3%
Net Rtg -53.7
+/- -22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.2m
Offense +4.1
Hustle +0.8
Defense -1.3
Raw total +3.6
Avg player in 20.2m -11.6
Impact -8.0
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S DeMar DeRozan 10.4m
9
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
+2.6

Surgical midrange execution yielded a highly positive impact before his night was cut short. He methodically picked apart his individual matchups, though the lack of minutes capped his overall influence on the game.

Shooting
FG 4/5 (80.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 90.0%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -1.2
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.4m
Offense +6.3
Hustle +1.1
Defense +1.2
Raw total +8.6
Avg player in 10.4m -6.0
Impact +2.6
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
15
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
-6.3

Shot-chucking from the outside buried his overall effectiveness. He generated decent hustle metrics, but burning through possessions with low-percentage looks prevented the offense from finding any sustainable rhythm.

Shooting
FG 5/13 (38.5%)
3PT 3/9 (33.3%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 52.4%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -22.2
+/- -16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.7m
Offense +8.3
Hustle +4.5
Defense +1.4
Raw total +14.2
Avg player in 35.7m -20.5
Impact -6.3
How is this calculated?
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
15
pts
8
reb
2
ast
Impact
+8.6

An absolute force on the interior, punishing mismatches with near-perfect efficiency around the rim. His relentless energy generated massive hustle and defensive metrics, anchoring a wildly successful two-way performance.

Shooting
FG 7/8 (87.5%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 93.8%
USG% 15.7%
Net Rtg -29.5
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.2m
Offense +12.2
Hustle +4.8
Defense +7.2
Raw total +24.2
Avg player in 27.2m -15.6
Impact +8.6
How is this calculated?
STL 2
BLK 4
TO 3
Malik Monk 14.4m
7
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-5.3

A lack of offensive initiation and sloppy ball security quickly derailed his brief stint. He failed to provide his usual spark-plug scoring, instead bogging down possessions and allowing the opposition to capitalize on his mistakes.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 70.0%
USG% 23.5%
Net Rtg -56.3
+/- -19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.4m
Offense -0.1
Hustle +0.4
Defense +2.6
Raw total +2.9
Avg player in 14.4m -8.2
Impact -5.3
How is this calculated?
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
2
pts
2
reb
4
ast
Impact
-3.6

Complete offensive ineptitude erased the value of his pesky point-of-attack defense. He was actively ignored by the opposing defense, suffocating his team's spacing and resulting in a net-negative impact.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg -65.1
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.5m
Offense -2.3
Hustle +1.2
Defense +5.2
Raw total +4.1
Avg player in 13.5m -7.7
Impact -3.6
How is this calculated?
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 3
3
pts
0
reb
3
ast
Impact
-3.3

Failed to bend the defense as a movement shooter, rendering his minutes largely ineffective. Without his gravity creating open lanes, his lack of defensive resistance made him a liability on the floor.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 10.7%
Net Rtg -54.3
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.9m
Offense +2.8
Hustle +0.2
Defense 0.0
Raw total +3.0
Avg player in 10.9m -6.3
Impact -3.3
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
LAC LA Clippers
S Kawhi Leonard 29.9m
26
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
+6.7

A heavy scoring load drove a massive offensive box score rating, anchoring his positive net impact. While his perimeter jumper was slightly erratic, his ability to consistently generate quality looks as the primary option kept the offense afloat.

Shooting
FG 9/18 (50.0%)
3PT 3/9 (33.3%)
FT 5/5 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 64.4%
USG% 30.9%
Net Rtg +45.3
+/- +26
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.9m
Offense +19.5
Hustle +2.9
Defense +1.4
Raw total +23.8
Avg player in 29.9m -17.1
Impact +6.7
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Kris Dunn 26.6m
13
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
+9.8

An absolute masterclass in two-way efficiency fueled a massive statistical surge. He locked down his perimeter matchups to generate a stellar defensive rating, while punishing the defense with flawless shot selection when left open.

Shooting
FG 5/6 (83.3%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 100.9%
USG% 13.3%
Net Rtg +29.6
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.6m
Offense +12.1
Hustle +5.3
Defense +7.7
Raw total +25.1
Avg player in 26.6m -15.3
Impact +9.8
How is this calculated?
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 2
6
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.2

Despite highly efficient finishing when called upon, his overall impact slipped into the red due to extreme offensive passivity. He generated positive defensive and hustle metrics, but simply didn't command enough usage to leave a tangible imprint on the game.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 8.8%
Net Rtg +39.6
+/- +21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.2m
Offense +6.9
Hustle +3.5
Defense +3.0
Raw total +13.4
Avg player in 25.2m -14.6
Impact -1.2
How is this calculated?
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Darius Garland 24.4m
17
pts
4
reb
6
ast
Impact
-2.1

Errant perimeter shooting dragged down an otherwise productive scoring night. His playmaking generated some positive offensive momentum, but likely live-ball mistakes and missed momentum threes ultimately pushed his net impact into the negative.

Shooting
FG 7/14 (50.0%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.9%
USG% 29.6%
Net Rtg +22.7
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.4m
Offense +10.2
Hustle +1.3
Defense +0.5
Raw total +12.0
Avg player in 24.4m -14.1
Impact -2.1
How is this calculated?
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Brook Lopez 19.1m
9
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.8

Defensive struggles and a lack of interior presence severely hampered his overall rating. He failed to establish himself as a rim deterrent, and a low-volume shooting night wasn't enough to offset the points surrendered on the other end.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 66.6%
USG% 19.0%
Net Rtg +35.7
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.1m
Offense +5.1
Hustle +1.6
Defense -0.6
Raw total +6.1
Avg player in 19.1m -10.9
Impact -4.8
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
5
pts
6
reb
5
ast
Impact
-3.3

Complete offensive invisibility tanked his overall rating despite putting up elite defensive metrics. He completely abandoned his usual scoring aggression, failing to pressure the rim or draw fouls to balance out his defensive effort.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 8.8%
Net Rtg +30.4
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.4m
Offense +1.9
Hustle +1.4
Defense +9.1
Raw total +12.4
Avg player in 27.4m -15.7
Impact -3.3
How is this calculated?
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 2
John Collins 23.9m
25
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+11.7

Relentless offensive aggression defined this performance, as he hunted his shot to perfection from beyond the arc. His high-volume scoring completely overwhelmed the opposing frontcourt, resulting in a dominant positive impact.

Shooting
FG 9/20 (45.0%)
3PT 4/6 (66.7%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.6%
USG% 37.7%
Net Rtg +32.7
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.9m
Offense +18.4
Hustle +3.4
Defense +3.8
Raw total +25.6
Avg player in 23.9m -13.9
Impact +11.7
How is this calculated?
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
13
pts
2
reb
6
ast
Impact
+4.0

Flawless perimeter execution maximized his value in a secondary role. He capitalized on every catch-and-shoot opportunity, providing a lethal offensive spark without needing to dominate the ball.

Shooting
FG 5/6 (83.3%)
3PT 3/3 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 108.3%
USG% 12.9%
Net Rtg +39.6
+/- +21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.5m
Offense +11.3
Hustle +3.1
Defense +3.0
Raw total +17.4
Avg player in 23.5m -13.4
Impact +4.0
How is this calculated?
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
Kobe Sanders 20.3m
17
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
+15.3

A stunning two-way breakout saw him perfectly balance high-efficiency shot-making with relentless defensive energy. He exploited defensive rotations for easy perimeter looks while simultaneously blowing up opponent actions on the other end.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 87.1%
USG% 17.0%
Net Rtg +33.4
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.3m
Offense +15.0
Hustle +5.5
Defense +6.5
Raw total +27.0
Avg player in 20.3m -11.7
Impact +15.3
How is this calculated?
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-4.6

Forced shots in limited minutes quickly cratered his net impact. He struggled to find the rhythm of the game during his brief stint, rushing his offensive touches rather than letting the play develop.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 25.0%
USG% 23.8%
Net Rtg +11.8
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.3m
Offense -0.5
Hustle +0.2
Defense -0.1
Raw total -0.4
Avg player in 7.3m -4.2
Impact -4.6
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.3

A purely cardio stint yielded zero tangible box score production. He was unable to generate any offensive initiation during his brief rotation, leaving his overall impact entirely dependent on the negative lineup shifts around him.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -18.9
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.0m
Offense 0.0
Hustle 0.0
Defense -0.5
Raw total -0.5
Avg player in 5.0m -2.8
Impact -3.3
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
5
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
+3.5

Maximized a tiny rotational window by aggressively attacking the basket. His perfect execution in limited touches provided a highly concentrated burst of positive offensive value.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 107.8%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg -18.9
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.0m
Offense +5.5
Hustle +0.2
Defense +0.7
Raw total +6.4
Avg player in 5.0m -2.9
Impact +3.5
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.2

Two quick, ill-advised perimeter misses immediately sank his rating during a fleeting appearance. He failed to establish any offensive rhythm, acting as a possession-killer in his brief time on the floor.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg -133.3
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.6m
Offense -1.8
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total -1.8
Avg player in 2.6m -1.4
Impact -3.2
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0