GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

Share Post

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

LAC LA Clippers
S Kawhi Leonard 40.2m
21
pts
7
reb
3
ast
Impact
-4.9

A catastrophic turnover penalty (-12.6) completely derailed what was otherwise a surgical offensive showing. Despite generating excellent scoring value (+15.1) and hitting difficult looks (+3.7 shot-making), his inability to protect the basketball bled away all his positive contributions. The uncharacteristic sloppiness in possession control defined this frustrating outing.

Shooting
FG 8/17 (47.1%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.0%
USG% 24.0%
Net Rtg +5.7
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.2m
Scoring +15.1
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +3.7
Hustle +2.1
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -12.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 30.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 5
S Brook Lopez 37.2m
17
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
+10.7

Dominant work on the glass (+6.3 hustle) and flawless ball security (+0.0 TO penalty) anchored a stellar two-way shift. He paired his traditional rim protection (+3.4 defense) with highly efficient scoring (+10.2) and a strong shot-making bonus. This was a masterclass in maximizing value through mistake-free, fundamental execution.

Shooting
FG 7/16 (43.8%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.4%
USG% 18.9%
Net Rtg -10.1
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.2m
Scoring +10.2
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +3.6
Hustle +6.3
Defense +3.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 20
FGM Against 17
Opp FG% 85.0%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 0
S Kris Dunn 32.4m
7
pts
3
reb
10
ast
Impact
-1.4

Suffocating point-of-attack defense (+4.7) wasn't quite enough to drag his overall impact into the green. While he provided modest scoring value (+5.6), a lack of high-end creation and a noticeable turnover penalty (-2.4) limited his offensive ceiling. His defensive harassment remains elite, but the offensive limitations continue to cap his overall effectiveness.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 70.0%
USG% 7.9%
Net Rtg -14.9
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.4m
Scoring +5.6
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +1.9
Defense +4.7
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 80.0%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 1
S Darius Garland 31.1m
21
pts
5
reb
8
ast
Impact
+6.9

Explosive scoring (+16.7) and excellent shot-making (+4.9) easily outpaced his defensive struggles (-3.2) in this matchup. He surprisingly added massive value on the boards (+6.3 hustle), which helped offset a sloppy turnover penalty (-4.7). The sheer offensive firepower and unexpected rebounding effort drove his positive impact.

Shooting
FG 8/15 (53.3%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 64.3%
USG% 23.7%
Net Rtg -17.2
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.1m
Scoring +16.7
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +4.9
Hustle +6.3
Defense -3.2
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
13
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
+6.0

Elite defensive disruption (+5.4) and mistake-free ball security (+0.0 TO penalty) formed the foundation of a highly effective two-way performance. He supplemented his lockdown perimeter defense with efficient scoring (+10.0) and solid shot-making (+2.0). Playing within himself and avoiding turnovers allowed his athletic versatility to shine.

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 65.8%
USG% 17.2%
Net Rtg -7.1
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.8m
Scoring +10.0
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +1.6
Defense +5.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 22.2%
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 0
23
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
+10.6

A massive scoring eruption (+20.2) and elite defensive metrics (+6.2) powered a dominant two-way performance. He hit incredibly difficult looks to generate a huge shot-making bonus (+5.9), which was desperately needed to offset a catastrophic turnover penalty (-9.5). The sheer volume of his offensive production and defensive havoc simply overwhelmed his ball-control issues.

Shooting
FG 7/11 (63.6%)
3PT 5/6 (83.3%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 90.1%
USG% 24.6%
Net Rtg -6.6
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.8m
Scoring +20.2
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +5.9
Hustle +0.9
Defense +6.2
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 4
John Collins 21.2m
11
pts
9
reb
0
ast
Impact
+5.9

Absolute dominance on the glass (+10.5 hustle) and engaged interior defense (+5.2) salvaged a game marred by severe turnover issues (-7.1). While his decision-making with the ball was highly destructive, his relentless motor and efficient finishing (+8.4 scoring) kept his overall value firmly positive. He essentially out-worked his own mistakes to remain highly impactful.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 68.8%
USG% 20.4%
Net Rtg -11.6
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.2m
Scoring +8.4
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +10.5
Defense +5.2
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 3
5
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-8.8

A glaring lack of offensive assertiveness (+3.7 scoring) and a costly turnover penalty (-3.1) tanked his overall impact. He failed to generate meaningful defensive disruption (+0.8) or creation value, rendering him a virtual non-factor during his minutes. This outing was defined by extreme passivity and an inability to positively influence the game flow.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 86.8%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.6m
Scoring +3.7
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Kobe Sanders 10.7m
3
pts
0
reb
3
ast
Impact
-14.2

Complete offensive invisibility (+1.4 scoring) and a total lack of hustle stats (+0.0) resulted in a disastrous rotational stint. He bled value through careless turnovers (-2.4) while offering absolutely no resistance on the defensive end (-0.3). The inability to impact any single facet of the game made him a massive liability on the floor.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +32.1
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.7m
Scoring +1.4
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
GSW Golden State Warriors
17
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
+2.1

Relentless work on the boards generated elite hustle value (+8.9), keeping his overall impact in the green despite severe ball-control issues. A massive turnover penalty (-9.5) nearly erased his positive scoring (+10.9) and shot-making contributions. He continues to offset his sloppy decision-making with high-motor dirty work.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 5/8 (62.5%)
Advanced
TS% 58.5%
USG% 18.6%
Net Rtg +12.9
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.5m
Scoring +10.9
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +3.3
Hustle +8.9
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 53.3%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 4
S Stephen Curry 35.8m
35
pts
1
reb
4
ast
Impact
+13.0

Transcendent shot-making (+9.2) and overwhelming scoring gravity (+27.3) completely masked his defensive shortcomings (-3.9). Even with a steep turnover penalty (-7.1) dragging down his efficiency, his ability to convert highly difficult perimeter looks broke the opponent's defensive scheme. This was a classic case of offensive mastery rendering mistakes irrelevant.

Shooting
FG 12/23 (52.2%)
3PT 7/12 (58.3%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 69.4%
USG% 32.9%
Net Rtg +11.8
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.8m
Scoring +27.3
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +9.2
Hustle +0.3
Defense -3.9
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S Draymond Green 35.3m
7
pts
6
reb
9
ast
Impact
-2.5

Elite defensive metrics (+9.2) were entirely negated by careless ball security (-8.5 TO penalty). While he orchestrated the offense well enough to generate positive creation value (+2.3), the sheer volume of live-ball mistakes crippled his overall effectiveness. This outing perfectly captured his ongoing struggle to balance aggressive playmaking with basic possession control.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 70.0%
USG% 9.8%
Net Rtg +1.6
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.3m
Scoring +5.4
Creation +2.3
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +1.8
Defense +9.2
Turnovers -8.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 53.3%
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 3
S Gui Santos 31.9m
20
pts
6
reb
5
ast
Impact
+3.2

Turnover damage (-12.6) severely undercut an otherwise stellar offensive showing. His ability to hit difficult looks generated a solid shot-making bonus (+4.8) and scoring punch (+16.2), but reckless decision-making kept his overall impact grounded. The high volume of giveaways prevented this from being a dominant performance.

Shooting
FG 9/13 (69.2%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 76.9%
USG% 23.1%
Net Rtg +21.6
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.9m
Scoring +16.2
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +4.8
Hustle +6.7
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -12.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 52.9%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 5
20
pts
5
reb
5
ast
Impact
+14.7

A massive scoring output (+16.1) and strong shot-making bonus (+4.5) fueled a highly efficient two-way performance. He supplemented his perimeter touch with excellent hustle value (+6.3) on the glass, dominating the interior while stretching the floor. Minimal turnover damage (-2.4) allowed his offensive gravity to dictate the flow of the game.

Shooting
FG 8/12 (66.7%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 1/3 (33.3%)
Advanced
TS% 75.1%
USG% 20.3%
Net Rtg -6.6
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.6m
Scoring +16.1
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +4.5
Hustle +6.3
Defense +3.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 20
FGM Against 13
Opp FG% 65.0%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 1
6
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-3.1

Despite generating strong defensive value (+4.1) and playing mistake-free basketball, a lack of offensive assertiveness dragged his overall impact into the negative. His scoring (+3.7) and shot-making (+0.8) metrics barely registered, making him a virtual non-factor on that end of the floor. The defensive havoc simply wasn't enough to compensate for playing 4-on-5 offensively.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 56.4%
USG% 8.8%
Net Rtg +15.1
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.9m
Scoring +3.7
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +1.9
Defense +4.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
7
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
-9.0

A crippling lack of scoring punch (+3.6) and a steep turnover penalty (-4.7) doomed his overall impact. He failed to generate meaningful defensive disruption (+1.0) to offset his offensive struggles, resulting in a highly damaging rotational stint. The inability to convert looks or protect the basketball made him a glaring liability.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 44.4%
USG% 18.9%
Net Rtg -12.0
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.6m
Scoring +3.6
Creation +1.7
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +2.5
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
Al Horford 22.4m
14
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.3

Strong floor-spacing and shot-making value (+3.9) were completely undone by defensive struggles (-1.9) and sloppy ball security (-4.7). While he provided a solid scoring punch (+11.6), his inability to anchor the paint or facilitate for others left his overall impact firmly in the red. The veteran's one-dimensional offensive contribution couldn't hide his defensive decline.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 4/7 (57.1%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 87.5%
USG% 19.6%
Net Rtg -12.7
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.4m
Scoring +11.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2