LAC

2025-26 Season

JORDAN MILLER

LA Clippers | Guard | 6-5
Jordan Miller
9.9 PPG
3.0 RPG
2.3 APG
22.0 MPG
+0.6 Impact

Miller produces at an average rate for a 22-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+0.6
Scoring +9.2
Points 9.9 PPG = +7.3
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.9
Creation +0.9
Creation 2.3 AST/g = +0.9
Turnovers -2.4
Turnovers 1.0/g = -2.4
Defense +0.9
Defense 0.8 STL, 0.2 BLK = +0.9
Hustle & Effort +2.4
Rebounds 3.0 RPG = +2.4
Raw Impact +11.0
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.4
Net Impact
+0.6
62th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 245 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 56th
10.3 PPG
Efficiency 94th
62.2% TS
Playmaking 42th
2.4 APG
Rebounding 56th
3.2 RPG
Defense 74th
+9.5/g
Hustle 69th
+10.5/g
Creation 73th
+3.60/g
Shot Making 39th
+5.78/g
TO Discipline 64th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Jordan Miller's first twenty games were defined by a maddening inconsistency, swinging violently between elite two-way wing play and complete offensive invisibility. When he actively engaged without the ball, he was lethal. His blistering perimeter shooting and decisive off-ball movement fueled a massive +10.5 impact score on 11/12 vs DEN. Yet, that aggression frequently vanished into thin air. Even when providing solid weak-side rim protection, his absolute refusal to look at the basket crippled the team's spacing, resulting in a disastrous -5.1 impact on 12/28 vs DET where he logged zero points in 17 minutes. Thankfully, he rebounded late in the stretch by leaning into his physical tools. On 01/16 vs TOR, Miller suffocated his primary assignments to drive an elite +10.7 impact score, pairing his lockdown defense with 19 points across a grueling 46 minutes. If he wants to thrive as a permanent rotation fixture, he must realize that relentless cutting and defensive hustle are his true NBA lifelines.

Jordan Miller's midseason stretch was defined by maddening inconsistency. He oscillated wildly between masterful offensive orchestration and catastrophic shot selection. His worst habits surfaced on 02/04 vs CLE, where a disastrous 2-for-10 shooting night yielded a brutal -13.0 impact score because he repeatedly forced contested looks early in the clock. Even when he scored efficiently, as he did during a 14-point effort on 02/22 vs ORL, his -0.6 impact score revealed the hidden costs of his poor defensive resistance. Yet, when Miller played within the flow of the offense, he looked entirely different. On 03/01 vs NOP, he generated a brilliant +11.5 impact score by making lightning-quick reads to dish out 8 assists while shooting a near-perfect 5-for-6 from the floor for 19 points. To survive in a permanent rotation spot, he must abandon the forced jumpers and commit entirely to high-IQ slashing.

Jordan Miller's late-season stretch was defined by maddening inconsistency, bouncing wildly between brilliant off-ball efficiency and forced, disjointed isolation play. His box scores frequently lied about his actual value, a reality perfectly illustrated on Mar 11 vs MIN. Despite tallying 14 points and 7 assists, he dragged the second unit down to a brutal -10.4 impact score because he constantly forced the issue in isolation rather than playing within the flow of the offense. Just five days later, he flipped the script entirely on Mar 16 vs SAS. By abandoning the hero ball in favor of flawless shot selection and relentless off-ball cutting, he erupted for 22 points and an astronomical +16.4 impact mark. Miller also found ways to drive winning basketball when his jumper completely abandoned him, like his spot start on Mar 19 vs NOP. He shot a dreadful 2-for-8 from the floor for just 11 points in that contest, yet still posted a sturdy +6.0 impact score. That positive rating stemmed entirely from his stellar defensive activity—highlighted by a massive +14.3 defensive metric—and a willingness to crash the glass.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Miller's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 64% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Miller locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 6 games. Longest cold streak: 8 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 57 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

N. Clifford 33.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4
S. Bey 33.2 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4
T. Hardaway Jr. 30.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
R. Sheppard 28.2 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.18
PTS 5
A. Dosunmu 27.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 4
A. Edwards 26.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 4
B. Hyland 26.4 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 3
T. Murphy III 26.3 poss
FG% 83.3%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.53
PTS 14
B. Brown 25.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 8
O. Agbaji 25.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

S. Bey 59.3 poss
FG% 11.1%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.05
PTS 3
B. Brown 35.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 5
O. Agbaji 32.9 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 3
K. Johnson 30.4 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 9
N. Clifford 28.4 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 3
W. Riley 26.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
P. Nance 26.0 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 4
B. McGowens 25.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
M. Smart 24.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 6
N. Reid 24.7 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 6

SEASON STATS

61
Games
9.9
PPG
3.0
RPG
2.3
APG
0.8
SPG
0.2
BPG
53.1
FG%
35.1
3P%
78.0
FT%
22.0
MPG

GAME LOG

61 games played