DEN

2025-26 Season

BRUCE BROWN

Denver Nuggets | Guard-Forward | 6-4
Bruce Brown
8.0 PPG
4.0 RPG
2.1 APG
24.5 MPG
-2.7 Impact

Brown produces at an below average rate for a 24-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-2.7
Scoring +6.9
Points 8.0 PPG = +5.3
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.6
Creation +0.8
Creation 2.1 AST/g = +0.8
Turnovers -2.5
Turnovers 1.1/g = -2.5
Defense +0.5
Defense 1.1 STL, 0.2 BLK = +0.5
Hustle & Effort +3.4
Rebounds 4.0 RPG = +3.4
Raw Impact +9.1
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.8
Net Impact
-2.7
41st pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 245 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 37th
8.0 PPG
Efficiency 42th
53.8% TS
Playmaking 37th
2.1 APG
Rebounding 76th
4.0 RPG
Defense 81th
+10.0/g
Hustle 76th
+11.4/g
Creation 35th
+2.28/g
Shot Making 27th
+4.98/g
TO Discipline 68th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Bruce Brown’s first twenty games of the season were defined by a jarring offensive slump and erratic defensive lapses that severely limited his value off the bench. He occasionally found ways to tilt the floor without filling the bucket. Look no further than 10/29 vs NOP. Despite scoring just 5 points, he posted a massive +12.0 impact score driven entirely by scrappy point-of-attack defense and relentless loose-ball pursuit. Yet, those winning plays were frequently overshadowed by catastrophic breakdowns. During his 12/25 vs MIN appearance, he chipped in 7 points, but his overall impact plummeted to a staggering -16.2 because constant miscommunications on defensive switches surrendered a barrage of easy baskets. Even when he flashed rare playmaking brilliance with 10 assists on 11/29 vs PHX, a sharp regression in finishing dragged him down to a -3.4 impact rating. He simply cannot survive as a connective piece when his defensive shell cracks and his touch around the rim evaporates.

A maddening inconsistency defined Bruce Brown's mid-season stretch, bouncing wildly between opportunistic energy guy and outright defensive liability. During a rare start on 12/18 vs ORL, he managed 11 points but posted a disastrous -14.2 impact score. Getting repeatedly torched on straight-line drives completely eradicated his offensive contributions that night. He flipped the script entirely on 12/20 vs HOU. Thriving in the chaotic transition game, Brown grabbed 12 rebounds and fueled a stellar +10.4 impact score through relentless energy on the glass rather than sheer scoring volume. Yet, those hustle-driven peaks were too often erased by hidden defensive costs later in the month. On 12/29 vs MIA, he poured in 15 points on highly efficient 7-for-9 shooting, but still dragged the unit down with a -3.6 impact because of glaring defensive lapses and poor rotations. To salvage his nightly rotation spot, these sloppy mistakes and bouts of off-ball passivity must vanish.

Bruce Brown’s midseason stretch was defined by a frustrating paradox where his most productive scoring nights often actively harmed his team. During the 01/23 vs MIL matchup, he poured in 15 points on an efficient 6-for-11 from the floor, yet posted a -4.7 impact score because a disastrous -9.0 defensive rating completely erased his offensive contributions. His highest-scoring effort of the span, a 19-point outburst on 02/19 vs LAC, similarly resulted in a negative -1.1 impact due to costly lapses on the other end of the floor (-3.2 def). Conversely, he found ways to win on the margins when his jumper abandoned him. In the 01/22 vs WAS contest, Brown managed just 6 points but generated a +5.8 impact score by leaning heavily into gritty perimeter defense (+1.6 def) and relentless activity (+2.6 hustle). When he committed to being a disruptive pest, his overall value soared regardless of his shooting volume. But whenever he treated defensive rotations as an afterthought, his efficient finishing meant absolutely nothing.

Bruce Brown’s late-season bench stint was defined by maddening inconsistency, oscillating wildly between disruptive two-way energy and complete offensive invisibility. He dropped an efficient 12 points on Mar 20 vs TOR, yet posted a -4.5 impact score because poorly timed defensive gambles routinely compromised the team's shell. Just two days earlier on Mar 18 vs MEM, a total offensive disappearing act yielded a brutal -14.9 impact as he failed to hit a single shot from the floor. When he actually dialed in his focus, his value skyrocketed. During the Mar 22 vs POR matchup, Brown wreaked havoc in the transition game to generate a stellar +10.8 impact, turning live-ball turnovers into immediate fast-break points. Ultimately, this erratic stretch exposed a rotation piece struggling to string together reliable shifts, letting passive off-ball movement and defensive lapses drag down his overall utility.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Brown's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~5 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 53% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Brown locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Hot right now — 4 straight games with positive impact. Longest positive run this season: 4 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 75 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

R. Sheppard 69.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 13
C. Spencer 48.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
M. Monk 36.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Miller 35.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 5
D. DeRozan 34.3 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
B. Williams 33.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 5
B. Hyland 31.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
T. Maxey 31.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 4
G. Allen 30.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
J. McCain 30.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

R. Sheppard 71.6 poss
FG% 27.8%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 16
N. Reid 57.0 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.23
PTS 13
M. Monk 37.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 9
C. Spencer 32.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Durant 32.1 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 11
Q. Grimes 32.0 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 42.9%
PPP 0.28
PTS 9
R. Nembhard 31.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 5
C. Flagg 31.5 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.44
PTS 14
R. Westbrook 30.8 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 7
D. Bane 28.1 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 9

SEASON STATS

84
Games
8.0
PPG
4.0
RPG
2.1
APG
1.1
SPG
0.2
BPG
47.6
FG%
39.1
3P%
76.4
FT%
24.5
MPG

GAME LOG

84 games played