GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

DEN Denver Nuggets
S Nikola Jokić 40.1m
25
pts
13
reb
11
ast
Impact
+9.9

Masterful offensive orchestration and surprisingly robust defensive positioning (+5.5) fueled a dominant overall impact (+8.0). His elite creation metrics were amplified by his sheer dominance on the defensive glass (+3.4 Hustle), allowing him to dictate the game's entire tempo. He operated as an unstoppable hub, punishing the defense with both pinpoint passing and high-efficiency interior touch.

Shooting
FG 11/19 (57.9%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 64.3%
USG% 24.7%
Net Rtg +11.6
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.1m
Scoring +19.1
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +6.2
Hustle +6.8
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -11.8
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 5
S Jamal Murray 39.5m
30
pts
5
reb
7
ast
Impact
+12.2

A massive volume of high-leverage shot creation (+20.6 Box) powered his positive impact, even as he completely blanked from beyond the arc. He offset his severe perimeter miss penalties by relentlessly attacking the mid-range and setting up teammates, while chipping in engaged point-of-attack defense (+1.4). His sheer offensive gravity kept the defense scrambling, proving his value extends beyond pure shooting efficiency.

Shooting
FG 7/22 (31.8%)
3PT 0/8 (0.0%)
FT 16/16 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.7%
USG% 29.9%
Net Rtg +14.1
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.5m
Scoring +19.3
Creation +4.9
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +1.5
Defense -3.1
Turnovers -4.7
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Christian Braun 35.7m
12
pts
8
reb
1
ast
Impact
+4.6

Hidden costs, likely stemming from turnovers or poor shot selection, dragged his impact into the red (-3.8) despite solid defensive engagement (+0.6). While he provided a decent boost on the boards (+1.9 Hustle), his difficulty-adjusted miss penalties erased his baseline scoring value. This outing perfectly captured the maddening inconsistency of his offensive profile.

Shooting
FG 4/10 (40.0%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 55.1%
USG% 12.4%
Net Rtg +2.6
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.7m
Scoring +7.4
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +4.3
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Cameron Johnson 33.1m
12
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.5

Severe miss penalties from a high volume of erratic perimeter looks completely cratered his overall impact (-9.3). Despite finding some baseline scoring success, his inability to convert difficult shots efficiently turned his offensive diet into a massive liability. This performance highlighted the damaging floor of his game when his three-point stroke abandons him.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 16.3%
Net Rtg +3.8
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.1m
Scoring +6.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.4
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Aaron Gordon 29.2m
17
pts
8
reb
3
ast
Impact
+11.1

Elite interior finishing and relentless activity on the glass (+3.1 Hustle) drove a highly productive two-way performance. He generated massive value by hunting high-percentage looks near the rim, completely offsetting minor defensive lapses (-0.1). His ability to bully mismatches in the paint defined his overwhelmingly positive footprint.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 6/8 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 62.9%
USG% 20.5%
Net Rtg +12.5
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.2m
Scoring +12.5
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +10.2
Defense -3.1
Turnovers -3.1
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
7
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-5.6

A catastrophic offensive showing completely erased his surprisingly disruptive defensive metrics (+3.4). His erratic trigger and inability to convert high-difficulty perimeter looks resulted in severe shot-making penalties that tanked his overall value (-6.3). This performance was a textbook example of his chaotic, boom-or-bust nature actively harming the team's half-court rhythm.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.9%
USG% 15.3%
Net Rtg +17.0
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.2m
Scoring +4.3
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.9
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -4.7
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
Bruce Brown 21.1m
8
pts
7
reb
3
ast
Impact
+13.5

Absolute defensive tyranny (+11.8) drove an elite impact score, as he completely suffocated opposing ball-handlers on the perimeter. He supplemented this lockdown masterclass with opportunistic hustle plays (+1.3) and highly efficient, low-mistake offensive execution. This was the pinnacle of his role-player ceiling, tilting the game entirely through sheer two-way disruption.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.8%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +21.2
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.1m
Scoring +4.9
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +7.9
Defense +10.0
Turnovers -2.4
STL 5
BLK 0
TO 1
5
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.6

Perfect shooting efficiency allowed him to post a positive impact (+1.6) despite a very limited rotational role. By avoiding the miss penalties that usually plague his volatile offensive game, he maximized his brief floor time. He operated as a flawless, low-usage spacer, taking exactly what the defense gave him without forcing the issue.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 107.8%
USG% 10.5%
Net Rtg +17.5
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.2m
Scoring +4.5
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-13.6

A glaring lack of offensive involvement (-1.6 Box) and sluggish defensive mobility (-1.0) severely limited his effectiveness during a brief stint. While he managed to throw his weight around on the glass (+1.2 Hustle), his inability to generate any scoring gravity rendered him a spacing liability. The matchup clearly dictated his marginalization, exposing his heavy feet in space.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 5.3%
Net Rtg +5.5
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.9m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -3.1
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
MIN Minnesota Timberwolves
S Anthony Edwards 38.0m
22
pts
9
reb
7
ast
Impact
+4.3

A heavy volume of difficult, missed perimeter looks completely torpedoed his overall value (-2.1) despite positive defensive metrics (+2.8). While he remained active as a rebounder and playmaker (+2.0 Hustle), the severe shot-making penalties from his erratic perimeter trigger erased those gains. This performance highlighted the hidden costs of his tendency to devolve into an inefficient ball-stopper.

Shooting
FG 7/19 (36.8%)
3PT 2/9 (22.2%)
FT 6/7 (85.7%)
Advanced
TS% 49.8%
USG% 27.5%
Net Rtg -3.6
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.0m
Scoring +13.1
Creation +2.5
Shot Making +4.0
Hustle +2.7
Defense -0.7
Turnovers -7.8
STL 0
BLK 3
TO 3
S Rudy Gobert 37.8m
17
pts
10
reb
2
ast
Impact
+15.4

Total paint domination drove his highly positive impact (+7.6), anchored by elite rim protection and disruptive positioning (+5.0 Defense). His relentless activity on the glass (+5.5 Hustle) created crucial second-chance opportunities, reinforcing his status as an interior monolith. The sheer gravity of his defensive presence completely dictated the terms of engagement.

Shooting
FG 8/9 (88.9%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/5 (20.0%)
Advanced
TS% 75.9%
USG% 15.9%
Net Rtg -9.9
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.8m
Scoring +14.3
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +10.8
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -4.6
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S Jaden McDaniels 33.2m
16
pts
8
reb
3
ast
Impact
+5.7

A stark disconnect between his raw offensive production and defensive execution (-1.5) kept his overall impact muted at +0.1. While his activity on the glass provided a solid boost (Hustle: +3.0), his inability to connect from the perimeter severely capped his shot-making value. This performance perfectly illustrated his maddening tendency to oscillate between two-way dominance and offensive invisibility.

Shooting
FG 6/14 (42.9%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.8%
USG% 21.0%
Net Rtg -23.3
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.2m
Scoring +10.7
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +6.3
Defense -2.8
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
12
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+3.0

Strong perimeter defense (+3.9) couldn't salvage an impact score dragged into the red by offensive inefficiency. Although he connected on several deep looks, the difficulty-adjusted miss penalties from his high-volume outside diet ultimately outweighed his shot-making bonuses. His reliance on the three-point shot turned this outing into a volatile, net-negative roll of the dice.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 4/7 (57.1%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 13.7%
Net Rtg -1.7
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.4m
Scoring +8.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +1.2
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -2.4
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
S Julius Randle 31.3m
16
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
+5.5

Turnovers and poor shot selection likely erased his positive contributions on the glass (+3.1 Hustle). Despite a decent volume of inside scoring, his blank from beyond the arc dragged down his shot-making metrics, resulting in a slightly negative overall footprint (-1.3). This outing perfectly encapsulated his maddening tendency to blend bully-ball success with inefficient perimeter settling.

Shooting
FG 7/16 (43.8%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 47.4%
USG% 24.3%
Net Rtg -14.9
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.3m
Scoring +10.3
Creation +1.7
Shot Making +3.2
Hustle +5.0
Defense -2.8
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Ayo Dosunmu 27.9m
14
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
+4.9

Empty-calorie scoring masked a negative overall impact (-1.7) driven by a lack of high-leverage creation and defensive disruption. While he found some success from the perimeter, the hidden costs of poor decision-making or turnovers erased his baseline box score value (+8.5 Box). He operated more as a passive floor-spacer than the ruthless two-way initiator he has shown he can be.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 67.0%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -11.5
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.9m
Scoring +10.3
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +3.7
Hustle +0.0
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Naz Reid 17.3m
5
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-12.1

A severe lack of scoring punch and creation plunged his impact deep into the negative (-5.7), erasing decent activity on the boards (+1.9 Hustle). His inability to generate high-value looks or stretch the floor effectively resulted in a damaging offensive footprint. This outing exposed the volatile floor of his boom-or-bust offensive profile when his jumper isn't falling.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 41.7%
USG% 19.5%
Net Rtg -18.9
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.3m
Scoring +2.1
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +0.9
Defense -2.6
Turnovers -4.7
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
Mike Conley 10.6m
3
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-4.0

Savvy positional defense (+1.9) and timely hustle plays (+1.2) allowed him to post a positive impact despite a microscopic offensive workload. He managed the game efficiently without forcing bad looks, avoiding the steep miss penalties that often plague aging guards. This was a masterclass in providing connective tissue and veteran stability without needing to dominate the ball.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 150.0%
USG% 4.2%
Net Rtg +5.2
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.6m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.2

Crippling offensive passivity (-1.9 Box) completely negated his solid positional defense (+1.9) and connective orchestration. By failing to attempt a single shot, he became a glaring spacing liability, allowing the defense to completely ignore him in the half-court. His reluctance to look at the rim turned what could have been a stabilizing shift into a net-negative rotation.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 5.3%
Net Rtg -5.8
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.1m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -3.1
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-13.1

A completely invisible offensive shift (-2.4 Box) torpedoed his value during a brief, disastrous stint off the bench. Failing to register a single positive creation or shot-making metric, his erratic trigger actively harmed the second unit's rhythm. This outing perfectly captured the catastrophic floor of his microwave-scoring role when the shots refuse to fall.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 27.3%
Net Rtg -20.0
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.3m
Scoring -2.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0