GAME ANALYSIS

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

DEN Denver Nuggets
22
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
+12.5

Relentless off-ball activity and decisive perimeter shooting fueled a massive offensive breakout. He compounded his scoring threat by digging in defensively and generating timely hustle plays, cementing a highly positive two-way performance.

Shooting
FG 8/17 (47.1%)
3PT 4/7 (57.1%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.5%
USG% 23.8%
Net Rtg +17.5
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.5m
Offense +15.2
Hustle +4.1
Defense +4.4
Raw total +23.7
Avg player in 33.5m -11.2
Impact +12.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 1
23
pts
17
reb
4
ast
Impact
+25.5

Absolute physical dominance in the paint dictated the terms of this game from the opening tip. He bullied his primary matchups to secure elite hustle metrics, pairing ruthless interior efficiency with elite rim protection to post a staggering overall impact.

Shooting
FG 9/14 (64.3%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 73.0%
USG% 23.5%
Net Rtg +20.2
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.2m
Offense +23.3
Hustle +4.9
Defense +9.6
Raw total +37.8
Avg player in 32.2m -12.3
Impact +25.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 20
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 45.0%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 3
13
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
-1.2

Trigger-happy shot selection from beyond the arc actively harmed the team's offensive flow. A failure to contribute meaningfully in the hustle categories meant that his missed perimeter looks translated directly into transition opportunities for the opponent.

Shooting
FG 4/12 (33.3%)
3PT 3/9 (33.3%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 48.8%
USG% 18.6%
Net Rtg +8.6
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.6m
Offense +7.5
Hustle +1.6
Defense +4.4
Raw total +13.5
Avg player in 27.6m -14.7
Impact -1.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S Bruce Brown 25.6m
10
pts
8
reb
6
ast
Impact
+0.5

Despite stuffing the stat sheet with connective passing and rebounding, his overall impact slipped into the red due to disjointed offensive execution. Strong defensive metrics couldn't overcome the momentum-killing stretches where the offense stagnated under his direction.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 55.6%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg +11.0
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.6m
Offense +1.7
Hustle +2.3
Defense +6.5
Raw total +10.5
Avg player in 25.6m -10.0
Impact +0.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 4
S Tyus Jones 23.3m
9
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
-6.8

Flawless perimeter execution was completely undone by an inability to contain penetration on the other end of the floor. Opposing guards routinely targeted him in space, leading to a porous defensive rating that washed away his efficient offensive contributions.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 3/3 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 13.1%
Net Rtg +11.8
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.3m
Offense +3.7
Hustle +1.6
Defense +0.3
Raw total +5.6
Avg player in 23.3m -12.4
Impact -6.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
13
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
-3.1

A surprising scoring outburst was entirely negated by lethargic transition defense and a glaring lack of physical engagement. Registering a near-zero hustle score over heavy minutes allowed opponents to consistently win the loose-ball battles that swung the game's momentum.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 59.1%
USG% 18.8%
Net Rtg +29.5
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.6m
Offense +4.8
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.7
Raw total +4.7
Avg player in 29.6m -7.8
Impact -3.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
David Roddy 25.7m
21
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
+9.8

Bully-ball drives and decisive outside shooting caught the defense completely off guard, sparking a massive offensive turnaround from his recent baseline. He paired this hyper-efficient scoring with heavy rotational defense to firmly anchor the second unit's success.

Shooting
FG 8/12 (66.7%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 81.5%
USG% 24.6%
Net Rtg +25.0
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.7m
Offense +14.2
Hustle +2.7
Defense +6.8
Raw total +23.7
Avg player in 25.7m -13.9
Impact +9.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 30.8%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 2
Curtis Jones 19.9m
7
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
-2.1

Pure, unadulterated energy drove his highly positive impact despite a clunky shooting performance. He terrorized passing lanes and relentlessly crashed the glass to generate an elite hustle rating, proving that high-motor plays can completely override perimeter struggles.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +28.9
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.9m
Offense +5.2
Hustle +5.4
Defense +7.3
Raw total +17.9
Avg player in 19.9m -20.0
Impact -2.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
Zeke Nnaji 13.7m
5
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
-9.6

Provided functional, if unglamorous, frontcourt depth during his short stint on the floor. His willingness to battle for positioning yielded a slightly positive defensive footprint, keeping the unit afloat while the starters rested.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg -3.3
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.7m
Offense +3.2
Hustle +1.4
Defense +2.6
Raw total +7.2
Avg player in 13.7m -16.8
Impact -9.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 0
BLK 3
TO 2
KJ Simpson 6.7m
2
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.9

Made the most of a brief rotational cameo by staying disciplined within the defensive scheme. A quick bucket and zero glaring mistakes ensured his short shift was a net positive for the rotation.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 5.6%
Net Rtg +37.5
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.7m
Offense +3.1
Hustle +0.2
Defense +4.1
Raw total +7.4
Avg player in 6.7m -15.3
Impact -7.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.1

Maximized a microscopic two-minute stint by immediately drawing contact and getting to the charity stripe. His brief burst of physicality yielded an outsized positive net rating before heading back to the bench.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 113.6%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +83.3
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.1m
Offense +2.8
Hustle +0.7
Defense +2.3
Raw total +5.8
Avg player in 2.1m -13.9
Impact -8.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
OKC Oklahoma City Thunder
S Nikola Topić 38.5m
14
pts
2
reb
11
ast
Impact
-9.7

High-volume playmaking completely failed to translate into winning basketball, evidenced by a staggering negative net impact. Despite a massive offensive leap from his recent baseline and solid defensive metrics, empty-calorie possessions and likely live-ball mistakes crippled the team's momentum while he was on the floor.

Shooting
FG 6/12 (50.0%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 58.3%
USG% 20.6%
Net Rtg -23.7
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.5m
Offense -0.5
Hustle +3.5
Defense +8.9
Raw total +11.9
Avg player in 38.5m -21.6
Impact -9.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 30.0%
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 8
S Branden Carlson 37.4m
23
pts
12
reb
5
ast
Impact
+18.4

Stepping into a massive offensive hub role, he stretched the floor relentlessly despite streaky perimeter execution. The sheer volume of his activity overwhelmed the frontcourt matchup, generating a massive box score impact through relentless glass-cleaning and high-post facilitation.

Shooting
FG 8/18 (44.4%)
3PT 3/10 (30.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.2%
USG% 21.3%
Net Rtg -27.6
+/- -21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.4m
Offense +26.7
Hustle +3.9
Defense +2.5
Raw total +33.1
Avg player in 37.4m -14.7
Impact +18.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 29
FGM Against 16
Opp FG% 55.2%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
S Jared McCain 25.4m
15
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
+0.9

Defensive liabilities ultimately dragged down a highly productive scoring surge. While he found his spots beautifully on the perimeter to double his usual scoring average, a failure to generate stops or loose-ball recoveries left his overall net rating in the red.

Shooting
FG 6/11 (54.5%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 68.2%
USG% 19.7%
Net Rtg -7.5
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.4m
Offense +9.7
Hustle +1.6
Defense +1.7
Raw total +13.0
Avg player in 25.4m -12.1
Impact +0.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Aaron Wiggins 25.1m
13
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
+6.4

Elite point-of-attack defense defined this outing, anchoring a massive defensive rating that kept the opponent out of the paint. His aggressive off-ball movement also yielded a significant scoring spike, doubling his recent offensive output through sheer activity.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 54.7%
USG% 18.8%
Net Rtg -5.7
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.1m
Offense +9.3
Hustle +3.6
Defense +4.8
Raw total +17.7
Avg player in 25.1m -11.3
Impact +6.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 46.7%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 0
S Luguentz Dort 20.4m
5
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-9.5

An uncharacteristically cold shooting night torpedoed his overall impact, snapping a four-game streak of efficient scoring. The lack of offensive rhythm bled into his secondary stats, with minimal hustle plays generated to offset the bricked perimeter looks.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 35.7%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg -18.6
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.4m
Offense +1.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +2.8
Raw total +4.4
Avg player in 20.4m -13.9
Impact -9.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
14
pts
9
reb
2
ast
Impact
+9.8

A sudden surge in scoring aggression masked underlying rotational struggles that kept his team playing from behind. While he dominated his individual rebounding matchups to boost his box score metrics, a lack of connective hustle plays contributed to a negative overall footprint.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 59.5%
USG% 15.9%
Net Rtg -25.1
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.4m
Offense +10.0
Hustle +1.9
Defense +3.8
Raw total +15.7
Avg player in 33.4m -5.9
Impact +9.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
15
pts
12
reb
1
ast
Impact
+7.4

Brutal shot selection nearly derailed the offense, as he forced up a staggering amount of attempts to find his rhythm. However, he salvaged a neutral overall impact by turning into an absolute menace on the glass and generating high-level defensive stops to offset the wasted possessions.

Shooting
FG 7/22 (31.8%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 34.1%
USG% 28.6%
Net Rtg -33.1
+/- -22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.5m
Offense +7.3
Hustle +4.0
Defense +3.2
Raw total +14.5
Avg player in 31.5m -7.1
Impact +7.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
8
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.7

Floating on the perimeter without making a tangible imprint on the game resulted in a cratered net rating. He failed to leverage his size in the hustle categories, allowing opponents to exploit his defensive matchups while he settled for contested outside jumpers.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 45.0%
USG% 12.3%
Net Rtg -19.7
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.3m
Offense +2.9
Hustle +0.8
Defense +0.9
Raw total +4.6
Avg player in 28.3m -14.3
Impact -9.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 80.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0