LAC

2025-26 Season

BENNEDICT MATHURIN

LA Clippers | Guard-Forward | 6-5
Bennedict Mathurin
17.4 PPG
5.3 RPG
2.4 APG
29.9 MPG
+5.3 Impact

Mathurin produces at an elite rate for a 30-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+5.3
Scoring +14.9
Points 17.4 PPG = +11.8
Shot Making above expected FG% = +3.1
Creation +1.6
Creation 2.4 AST/g = +1.6
Turnovers -5.2
Turnovers 2.2/g = -5.2
Defense -0.1
Defense 0.8 STL, 0.2 BLK = -0.1
Hustle & Effort +4.2
Rebounds 5.3 RPG = +4.2
Raw Impact +15.4
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.1
Net Impact
+5.3
81st pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 245 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 85th
17.4 PPG
Efficiency 53th
55.3% TS
Playmaking 43th
2.4 APG
Rebounding 93th
5.3 RPG
Defense 47th
+7.1/g
Hustle 87th
+14.0/g
Creation 93th
+5.15/g
Shot Making 58th
+6.99/g
TO Discipline 24th
0.07/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Bennedict Mathurin’s first twenty games were defined by empty calories and maddeningly erratic decision-making. You can see the illusion of his production perfectly on 12/27 vs MIA, where his 25 points masked a deeply negative -8.5 impact score. That deficit was driven entirely by his own tunnel vision and ball-stopping habits. He routinely bled value by forcing heavily contested perimeter looks instead of keeping the offense flowing. Occasionally, his raw aggression actually translated into winning basketball, like his performance on 11/19 vs CHA. Relentless downhill attacking and physical positioning at the rim overwhelmed his matchups in that game, earning him a stellar +11.0 impact score. But those flashes were quickly erased by disastrous, trigger-happy outings, bottoming out on 11/24 vs DET when a brutal 3-for-13 shooting night tanked his value to a staggering -16.8 impact.

Maddening tunnel vision and wildly fluctuating shot selection defined this turbulent midseason stretch for Bennedict Mathurin. When he embraced a downhill attack mentality, he looked entirely unguardable. Look no further than his masterpiece on 02/19 vs DEN, where he relentlessly pressured the rim to hang 38 points and a massive +14.7 impact score. Yet, the bad habits always lingered. Despite scoring 26 points on 02/20 vs LAL, a heavy diet of forced isolation attempts and contested jumpers cratered his efficiency, resulting in a damaging -6.2 impact score. He did occasionally find ways to salvage his minutes when his offense abandoned him. During a rough 3-for-10 shooting night on 02/11 vs HOU, he locked in defensively to generate a +5.3 impact score. If he stops bailing out opposing defenses with lazy pull-ups, his ceiling remains sky-high.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Volatile for his role. Mathurin has noticeable ups and downs, with scoring moving ~8 points between games.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 44% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Average defender. Mathurin doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: +4.0, second-half: +6.6. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 9 games. Longest cold streak: 4 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 50 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

A. Thompson 68.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 10
J. Brown 55.8 poss
FG% 12.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.04
PTS 2
A. Nembhard 47.6 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 8
K. George 42.8 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 9
M. Buzelis 38.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.21
PTS 8
A. Dosunmu 37.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 5
J. Walter 36.8 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 6
J. McDaniels 36.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.14
PTS 5
A. Black 36.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 7
L. Dort 35.5 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 7

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

A. Thompson 76.0 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 9
K. George 47.2 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 9
R. Westbrook 45.9 poss
FG% 71.4%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 14
C. McCollum 43.7 poss
FG% 36.4%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 10
T. Murphy III 41.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 8
D. White 39.7 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 5
A. Dosunmu 39.5 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.38
PTS 15
S. Castle 39.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 8
O. Anunoby 38.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 9
FG% 54.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.49
PTS 18

SEASON STATS

56
Games
17.4
PPG
5.3
RPG
2.4
APG
0.8
SPG
0.2
BPG
43.2
FG%
32.9
3P%
86.3
FT%
29.9
MPG

GAME LOG

56 games played