GSW

2025-26 Season

WILL RICHARD

Golden State Warriors | Guard | 6-3
Will Richard
6.3 PPG
2.5 RPG
1.3 APG
19.7 MPG
-3.8 Impact

Richard produces at an below average rate for a 20-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-3.8
Scoring +5.6
Points 6.3 PPG = +4.2
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.4
Creation +0.4
Creation 1.3 AST/g = +0.4
Turnovers -1.7
Turnovers 0.8/g = -1.7
Defense +1.1
Defense 1.1 STL, 0.1 BLK = +1.1
Hustle & Effort +2.2
Rebounds 2.5 RPG = +2.2
Raw Impact +7.6
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.4
Net Impact
-3.8
32th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 245 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 23th
6.5 PPG
Efficiency 63th
56.6% TS
Playmaking 20th
1.4 APG
Rebounding 39th
2.5 RPG
Defense 97th
+13.9/g
Hustle 48th
+8.9/g
Creation 42th
+2.50/g
Shot Making 48th
+6.43/g
TO Discipline 77th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Will Richard’s first twenty games were defined by a chaotic transition from bench sparkplug to wildly unpredictable starter. When he was dialed in, his ceiling was astronomical. He peaked during 11/05 vs SAC, where a massive offensive explosion of 30 points and elite perimeter shot selection fueled a staggering +15.0 impact score. Yet, that aggression carried hidden costs when his discipline waned. During 11/07 vs DEN, he tallied a respectable 12 points, but a nasty habit of settling for contested perimeter looks dragged his net impact down to a damaging -3.1. He did not always need to fill it up to swing a game, however. Just look at 10/30 vs MIL, where a modest 7-point outing still yielded a massive +12.0 impact because he generated absolute chaos on defense and maintained flawless shot execution. If Richard wants to thrive in his expanded role, he must realize his ultimate value lies in relentless two-way energy rather than forced jump shots.

Erratic engagement and wild swings in aggression defined this maddening twenty-game stretch for Will Richard. His overall value frequently detached from his actual scoring output. On 01/17 vs CHA, he managed just 11 points on 5-for-12 shooting, but generated a staggering +10.1 impact score because his absolute dominance in the hustle categories completely masked his perimeter struggles. Conversely, hidden defensive costs routinely sabotaged his otherwise decent scoring nights. During an 01/03 vs UTA outing, he chipped in 8 points efficiently, yet posted a miserable -7.3 impact because a glaring lack of rotational awareness allowed a steady stream of uncontested backdoor cuts. Too often, Richard simply faded into the background. This passivity culminated in a catastrophic 01/20 vs TOR performance where he put up a disastrous offensive goose egg. Missing all four of his field goal attempts and failing to pressure the rim resulted in an abysmal -16.4 impact score to close out the stretch.

A maddeningly inconsistent stretch defined by extreme offensive passivity threatened to derail Will Richard's spot in the rotation. He occasionally found ways to influence winning without the ball, such as on 01/26 vs MIN where he scored just 4 points but generated a +4.1 impact by using elite point-of-attack defense to shut down his assignment. However, those gritty performances were frequently overshadowed by nights where his hesitancy actively sabotaged the offense. During a disastrous outing on 03/13 vs MIN, Richard completely vanished to the tune of zero points and a catastrophic -14.0 impact, allowing his defender to freely roam and double-team other players. Even when he managed to score efficiently, hidden costs often dragged him into the red. On 03/20 vs DET, he poured in 11 points on near-perfect shooting, yet posted a -4.2 impact because crippling defensive breakdowns off the ball bled points the other way. To stay on the floor, he desperately needs to banish this passive streak.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Inconsistent. Richard has clear good-night/bad-night splits, with scoring swinging ~6 points between games. You're never quite sure which version shows up.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 53% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Richard locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

In a rough stretch — 8 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 8 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 76 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

D. Vassell 46.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
FG% 37.5%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.21
PTS 9
A. Edwards 39.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 6
P. Pritchard 35.1 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.14
PTS 5
J. Giddey 34.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 8
C. McCollum 34.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
W. Riley 33.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 3
C. Johnson 33.4 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
L. Markkanen 28.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 6
C. Spencer 27.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 7

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

A. Edwards 41.2 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.51
PTS 21
S. Castle 40.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 8
J. Giddey 36.3 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 10
N. Powell 30.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 5
P. Pritchard 29.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 4
FG% 44.4%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.43
PTS 12
I. Quickley 28.2 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 9
W. Riley 27.8 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.29
PTS 8
C. McCollum 25.1 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.4
PTS 10
D. DiVincenzo 24.9 poss
FG% 16.7%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 3

SEASON STATS

70
Games
6.3
PPG
2.5
RPG
1.3
APG
1.1
SPG
0.1
BPG
46.8
FG%
33.5
3P%
85.2
FT%
19.7
MPG

GAME LOG

70 games played