Golden State Warriors

Western Conference

Golden State
Warriors

37-45
L3

ROSTER — IMPACT RANKINGS

Jimmy Butler III
Forward Yr 14 38G (38S)
+14.7
20.0 pts
5.6 reb
4.9 ast
31.1 min

This midseason stretch was defined by a classic veteran slow-burn, transitioning from passive facilitation into ruthless, high-efficiency scoring. On 12/25 vs DAL, Butler flirted with a triple-double by posting 14 points, nine rebounds, and nine assists. Yet he registered a pedestrian +0.4 Impact in that contest because he deferred too often, taking just ten shots instead of pressuring the defense as a primary scoring threat. The switch flipped in mid-January. Carving up the opposition during a 01/16 vs NYK masterclass, Butler poured in 32 points on 14-of-22 shooting to generate a massive +35.4 Impact. He delivered a similarly dominant performance on 01/12 vs ATL, where his 30 points and aggressive shot creation earned a +27.7 Impact. When Butler stops overpassing and hunts his own offense with this level of surgical accuracy, he remains an absolute nightmare for any defensive scheme.

Stephen Curry
Guard Yr 16 45G (43S)
+13.4
26.5 pts
3.5 reb
4.7 ast
31.1 min

Stephen Curry’s late-season stretch was defined by erratic shooting swings and a brief, shocking relegation to the second unit. The veteran guard obviously still possessed his lethal ceiling, completely torching the perimeter on 01/23 vs DAL. He buried eight triples on his way to 38 points, yielding a massive +24.0 Impact score fueled by sheer shot-making dominance. However, his counting stats occasionally masked deeper on-court flaws. Take the 01/20 vs MIA matchup, where Curry tallied 19 points and 11 assists but suffered a -1.4 Impact score because defensive bleeding and empty possessions entirely negated his playmaking. Looking for a spark two months later, the coaching staff actually brought him off the pine on 04/05 vs HOU. Curry embraced the unusual reserve role with ruthless efficiency, pouring in 29 points on 11-of-21 shooting to post a stellar +20.2 Impact score.

Charles Bassey
Center-Forward Yr 4 6G
+5.6
8.8 pts
6.0 reb
0.8 ast
16.9 min
Brandin Podziemski
Guard Yr 2 84G (45S)
+5.3
14.0 pts
5.2 reb
3.6 ast
28.7 min

This late-season stretch was defined by a permanent role change, with Brandin Podziemski quickly graduating from bench sparkplug to full-time starter. He earned that promotion through sheer rebounding grit. Just look at his performance on 02/24 vs NOP, where he logged a massive +16.5 Impact score off the bench. Despite shooting a miserable 1-for-6 from deep, he generated elite value by pulling down 15 rebounds to steal crucial extra possessions. Once he entered the starting five, his nightly effectiveness remained heavily tied to that same relentless energy. On nights when his motor stalled, like his dismal showing on 03/21 vs ATL, he was a massive liability with a -9.9 Impact score after sleepwalking to just five points and zero rebounds. Yet even when his jumper completely vanished, he usually found ways to survive. On 02/28 vs LAL, he scored a measly nine points on 0-for-6 shooting from three, but still managed a positive +1.5 Impact score by crashing the glass for seven rebounds and keeping the offense flowing with six assists.

Kristaps Porziņģis
Forward-Center Yr 10 17G (13S)
+4.6
16.1 pts
5.1 reb
2.4 ast
23.4 min

Kristaps Porziņģis spent this stretch riding a frustrating seesaw between unstoppable offensive force and passive perimeter liability. When his stroke caught fire, he was utterly dominant. He erupted for 28 points and a massive +23.1 impact on 03/27 vs WAS by drilling five three-pointers. Yet, just two days prior on 03/25 vs BKN, he managed a respectable 17 points but posted a dismal -7.7 impact. That negative mark stemmed from hidden defensive lapses and a total lack of perimeter gravity that dragged down his overall effectiveness despite the decent scoring total. On the flip side, Porziņģis occasionally generated value when his jumper abandoned him. During his outing on 04/12 vs LAC, he clanked all four of his attempts from deep and scored just 12 points, but still manufactured a +5.4 impact. He salvaged that ugly shooting night by crashing the glass for eight rebounds and executing the unglamorous dirty work inside.

Moses Moody
Guard Yr 4 60G (49S)
+2.6
12.1 pts
3.3 reb
1.6 ast
25.7 min

Moses Moody finally seized a full-time starting role and morphed into a lethal, high-volume perimeter weapon during this twenty-game stretch. He was absolutely devastating on 01/28 vs UTA, erupting for 26 points on blistering 9-of-15 shooting. That performance earned him a massive +27.6 impact score because he ruthlessly punished defensive rotations with elite shot selection. He did not always need to fill the scoring column to swing a game, however. During the 01/20 vs MIA matchup, Moody managed just 13 points but still posted a stellar +13.4 impact score by providing relentless defensive hustle and timely floor-spacing without demanding the basketball. Still, his heavy reliance on the three-pointer occasionally hurt his overall value when the jumper vanished. On 02/05 vs PHX, he clanked his way to 6 points on 2-of-7 shooting, resulting in a -5.8 impact score as his offensive stagnation bogged down the entire unit. Ultimately, this run turned him into a highly dangerous two-way fixture.

De'Anthony Melton
Guard Yr 7 51G (24S)
+1.4
12.3 pts
3.4 reb
2.6 ast
23.0 min

Extreme volatility and a late-season demotion to the bench defined De'Anthony Melton’s maddening spring campaign. When his touch was right, he looked like a legitimate offensive engine, peaking on 03/16 vs WAS with 27 points on a blistering 12-of-17 from the floor. His aggressive interior finishing and flawless shot selection that night generated a massive +23.7 Impact score. However, those highs were frequently erased by total offensive vanishing acts, most notably on 03/23 vs DAL. Despite grabbing six rebounds, Melton posted a disastrous -22.4 Impact score by missing all six of his field goal attempts and completely stalling the half-court offense. Even when he managed double-digit scoring, his value could plummet due to hidden costs. During the 03/20 vs DET matchup, he scored 14 points but registered a -2.6 Impact score because his inefficient volume shooting and total lack of playmaking actively harmed the team's rhythm.

Jonathan Kuminga
Forward Yr 4 20G (13S)
+1.3
12.1 pts
5.8 reb
2.5 ast
23.8 min

Jonathan Kuminga's late-season stretch off the bench was defined by maddening inconsistency, oscillating violently between hyper-efficient sparkplug and offensive black hole. His worst tendencies surfaced during a disastrous 03/21 vs GSW matchup, where he forced awful attempts against his former team to finish with just 2 points on 1-of-9 shooting. That selfish shot selection cratered the offense, yielding a brutal -13.5 impact score. Yet, he immediately flipped the script on 03/23 vs MEM. By taking in-rhythm looks and draining 4-of-6 from beyond the arc, he poured in 16 points to post a massive +16.3 impact score. Perhaps most interesting was his gritty outing on 04/10 vs CLE. Despite a miserable shooting night where he went 4-of-12 from the floor and missed all six of his three-pointers, Kuminga still salvaged a +10.5 impact score by locking in defensively and creating extra possessions through relentless hustle.

Al Horford
Center-Forward Yr 18 47G (13S)
-0.3
8.4 pts
4.8 reb
2.5 ast
21.7 min

Al Horford's mid-season stretch was defined by extreme volatility, alternating between vintage floor-stretching clinics and nights where his aging legs simply failed him. He turned back the clock on 02/22 vs DEN, pouring in 22 points and dishing out seven assists while draining six threes to generate a massive +16.1 Impact. That elite mark stemmed entirely from his flawless shot selection and crisp connective passing. But that offensive rhythm frequently vanished, leaving behind empty stat lines like his 04/15 vs LAC appearance. Despite a relatively high-scoring output of 14 points on an efficient 5-for-8 from the floor, Horford dragged the lineup down to a -4.3 Impact because he grabbed just three rebounds and completely abandoned his playmaking duties with zero assists. Conversely, he occasionally squeezed out positive value on true low-scoring nights. On 02/28 vs LAL, he tallied just 8 points but managed a +0.6 Impact by anchoring the defense and securing five rebounds. When the jumper isn't falling, the veteran must rely entirely on his basketball IQ to survive.

Gary Payton II
Guard Yr 9 75G (1S)
-1.5
7.4 pts
3.6 reb
1.7 ast
15.9 min

This late-season stretch was defined by relentless rim pressure and bizarrely dominant rebounding from a bench guard, turning Payton into a chaotic two-way catalyst. He occasionally fell into the trap of perimeter tunnel vision, like during the 02/22 vs DEN matchup where his 15 points yielded a -1.1 Impact score because he settled for eight three-point attempts and failed to record a single assist. Yet when he embraced his role as a gritty interior presence, his value skyrocketed regardless of his scoring totals. Look at his performance on 04/02 vs CLE; he scored just 8 points, but his staggering 12 rebounds generated a massive +11.9 Impact score by securing extra possessions and terminating opponent attacks. He was even more lethal when he completely abandoned the three-point line to attack the basket. During the 03/23 vs DAL contest, Payton converted a flawless 8-for-8 from the floor to post 17 points and a +13.6 Impact score, punishing the defense with pure efficiency. While his energy visibly waned during a mid-April slump, his ability to swing games through pure hustle made him an indispensable rotation piece.

Buddy Hield
Guard Yr 9 44G (3S)
-1.7
8.0 pts
2.5 reb
1.5 ast
17.4 min

Buddy Hield’s mid-season stretch was a chaotic pendulum swing between flamethrower efficiency and unplayable cold spells at the end of the bench. He briefly looked like the league's most lethal reserve during the 01/21 vs TOR matchup, erupting for 25 points on a flawless 6-for-6 from beyond the arc. That pristine shot selection and perimeter gravity earned him a massive +25.9 Impact score. However, when his jumper vanished, his on-court value cratered. During the 01/27 vs MIN contest, Hield clanked his way to 5 points on an abysmal 2-for-10 shooting night. Because he offers minimal secondary playmaking when his shots aren't falling, those forced, empty possessions dragged him down to a -10.8 Impact. After a brutal string of late-season cameos where his minutes evaporated, he finally relocated his stroke in the 04/12 vs MIA game, pouring in 31 points and seven triples to post a blistering +25.1 Impact.

Gui Santos
Forward Yr 2 70G (32S)
-1.9
9.3 pts
4.0 reb
2.4 ast
20.8 min

This late-season stretch was defined by extreme volatility, as Gui Santos toggled between looking like a budding offensive focal point and a detrimental chucker. He put everything together on 03/07 vs OKC, posting 22 points and 11 rebounds to generate a massive +19.5 Impact score driven by relentless rebounding and confident scoring. Just three days later on 03/10 vs CHI, that same aggression betrayed him. Despite scoring a respectable 17 points, he dragged the team down to a -9.4 Impact score because of brutal shot selection and a forced 7-of-19 shooting night. However, Santos also flashed the ability to be a gritty role player when his shot wasn't falling. On 03/02 vs LAC, he managed a +1.0 Impact score despite scoring just five points because he crashed the glass for 10 crucial rebounds and generated extra possessions. To take the next leap, he desperately needs to find a middle ground between reckless volume and consistent fundamental execution.

Seth Curry
Guard Yr 12 11G
-2.4
6.5 pts
1.1 reb
0.9 ast
12.2 min
Quinten Post
Center Yr 1 67G (35S)
-3.1
7.7 pts
4.0 reb
1.4 ast
17.3 min

Quinten Post's mid-season stretch was defined by maddening inconsistency, operating as a volatile big man whose value plummeted the moment his jumper stopped falling. When he forced the issue from the perimeter, the results were disastrous, perfectly illustrated on 03/09 vs UTA. In that start, a brutal 0-for-6 night from deep dragged him down to a -7.4 Impact score despite reaching 10 points. Yet, when he stopped shooting entirely, his hesitance crippled the offense just as badly. During a 20-minute stint on 03/05 vs HOU, Post attempted just two field goals. That passivity resulted in a staggering -15.8 Impact score, as his complete lack of scoring gravity allowed defenders to freely ignore him. He finally found his rhythm on 03/15 vs NYK, pouring in 22 points on 9-of-16 shooting. By confidently knocking down four triples and keeping the defense honest, he generated a +3.1 Impact score and looked like a legitimate rotation threat.

Will Richard
Guard Yr 0 70G (21S)
-3.8
6.3 pts
2.5 reb
1.3 ast
19.7 min

This stretch was defined by a maddening inconsistency where brief flashes of offensive brilliance were quickly swallowed by long, agonizing disappearing acts. Richard briefly looked like a legitimate rotation piece during a spot start on 02/25 vs MEM, racking up 21 points, five rebounds, and six assists. His aggressive shot creation and crisp secondary playmaking drove a stellar +14.4 Impact score that night. However, that momentum completely evaporated by the time he started on 03/16 vs WAS. Despite logging 32 minutes, Richard posted a brutal -13.4 Impact, failing to score a single point on 0-for-6 shooting while dragging down the lineup with empty possessions and poor defensive rotations. Even when he finally found his stroke again, hitting all four of his three-point attempts for 12 points on 03/23 vs DAL, his overall influence remained surprisingly muted. He managed just a +2.3 Impact in that contest because his perfect outside shooting was offset by a complete lack of rebounding and nonexistent defensive disruption. You simply cannot survive in a modern NBA rotation when you log zero points in nine separate games over a two-month span.

Trayce Jackson-Davis
Forward Yr 2 36G (1S)
-3.9
4.2 pts
3.1 reb
0.9 ast
11.4 min

This stretch of the season was defined by Trayce Jackson-Davis vanishing into the darkest corners of the bench. He actually started this block with a massive surge on 02/08 vs IND, racking up 10 points and 10 rebounds in just 16 minutes to generate a stellar +15.2 Impact score. That brief flash of dominant rebounding and efficient interior finishing quickly faded into a string of erratic garbage-time appearances. By the time he hit the floor on 03/11 vs NOP, he posted a brutal -9.5 Impact score in a measly three minutes because he forced three terrible, rushed shots (0-for-3 FG) instead of letting the offense flow. Things hit rock bottom on 03/23 vs UTA. Jackson-Davis logged seven minutes of pure cardio, grabbing a single rebound while putting up zeros across the rest of the box score to earn a staggering -17.4 Impact score. When a big man stops crashing the glass and starts rushing contested looks in limited minutes, his on-court value evaporates entirely.

LJ Cryer
Guard Yr 0 18G (1S)
-3.9
8.2 pts
1.6 reb
1.0 ast
16.2 min
Nate Williams
Guard Yr 3 14G (2S)
-4.0
8.0 pts
2.1 reb
1.0 ast
17.1 min
Pat Spencer
Guard Yr 2 67G (14S)
-4.3
7.1 pts
2.4 reb
3.5 ast
18.4 min

This late-season stretch was defined by erratic minutes and a maddening inability to string together consistent two-way play. When thrust into a heavy workload, his glaring inefficiency often tanked his value on the floor. Take the 04/07 vs SAC matchup, where he scored a respectable 14 points in a rare 41-minute start, but posted a -5.8 Impact score because he stalled out possessions by chucking up 16 shots to get there. However, he occasionally found ways to tilt the math without filling the scoring column. During the 03/29 vs DEN game, Spencer managed a +1.9 Impact despite scoring just 7 points on woeful 3-for-9 shooting. He salvaged that outing entirely through sharp playmaking and hustle, dishing out 8 assists and grabbing 5 rebounds to keep the offense humming. He did manage one genuine scoring burst on 03/21 vs ATL, pouring in 18 points on an efficient 8-of-14 from the floor to earn a stretch-high +8.4 Impact. Ultimately, those brief flashes of offensive rhythm were buried under too many nights of empty usage and misfired jumpers.

Draymond Green
Forward Yr 13 70G (70S)
-5.4
8.3 pts
5.5 reb
5.6 ast
27.7 min

This stretch was defined by a steep offensive decline that frequently rendered Green a glaring liability on the floor. His inability to pose a consistent scoring threat dragged down his overall effectiveness, even when he padded the box score with rebounds and assists. Look at 03/23 vs DAL. Green put up a respectable 11 points, seven rebounds, and six assists, but his -8.9 Impact reveals the hidden cost of his night. He bricked all five of his three-point attempts, allowing the defense to completely ignore him and crowd the paint. The floor fell out entirely on 04/07 vs SAC, where he managed just a single point and generated a brutal -17.2 Impact because his total offensive passivity forced his team to play four-on-five. Conversely, he occasionally salvaged his value without shooting, like on 04/05 vs HOU. Despite scoring only seven points, he posted a +1.3 Impact by dissecting the defense with 12 assists to manufacture clean looks for his teammates. Unfortunately, those masterclasses in distribution couldn't consistently mask his crippling shooting woes.

Malevy Leons
Forward Yr 1 25G (2S)
-6.4
3.3 pts
2.1 reb
0.9 ast
11.1 min

This eight-game stretch was defined by a harsh reality check regarding heavy minutes, followed immediately by a successful recalibration as a spark-plug reserve. When thrust into the starting lineup on 04/07 vs SAC, Leons looked entirely overwhelmed. Despite grabbing five rebounds and dishing three assists, his brutal 1-for-5 shooting cratered his overall effectiveness, resulting in a disastrous -17.4 impact score. A quick demotion fixed everything on 04/09 vs LAL. Playing 24 minutes off the bench, he poured in 12 points on 4-of-8 shooting while adding four rebounds and three assists, generating a team-lifting +6.0 impact score by finally converting his offensive touches. He maintained that momentum on 04/12 vs LAC, posting a +1.4 impact score by smartly taking what the defense gave him for eight points on a highly efficient 3-of-4 from the floor. Leons clearly thrives when asked to provide short bursts of efficient energy rather than carrying the burden of a starter's workload.

Omer Yurtseven
Center Yr 3 9G
-7.1
3.8 pts
3.3 reb
0.9 ast
11.6 min
L
GSW GSW 110
115 LAC LAC
Apr 12 Analysis available
-5
L
GSW GSW 118
124 SAC SAC
Apr 10 Analysis available
-6
L
LAL LAL 119
103 GSW GSW
Apr 9 Analysis available
-16
W
SAC SAC 105
110 GSW GSW
Apr 7 Analysis available
+5
L
HOU HOU 117
116 GSW GSW
Apr 5 Analysis available
-1
L
CLE CLE 118
111 GSW GSW
Apr 2 Analysis available
-7
L
SAS SAS 127
113 GSW GSW
Apr 1 Analysis available
-14
L
GSW GSW 93
116 DEN DEN
Mar 29 Analysis available
-23
W
WAS WAS 126
131 GSW GSW
Mar 28 Analysis available
+5
W
BKN BKN 106
109 GSW GSW
Mar 25 Analysis available
+3
W
GSW GSW 137
131 DAL DAL
Mar 23 Analysis available
+6
L
GSW GSW 110
126 ATL ATL
Mar 21 Analysis available
-16
L
GSW GSW 101
115 DET DET
Mar 20 Analysis available
-14
L
GSW GSW 99
120 BOS BOS
Mar 18 Analysis available
-21
W
GSW GSW 125
117 WAS WAS
Mar 16 Analysis available
+8
L
GSW GSW 107
110 NYK NYK
Mar 15 Analysis available
-3
L
MIN MIN 127
117 GSW GSW
Mar 13 Analysis available
-10
L
CHI CHI 130
124 GSW GSW
Mar 10 Analysis available
-6
L
GSW GSW 116
119 UTA UTA
Mar 9 Analysis available
-3
L
GSW GSW 97
104 OKC OKC
Mar 7 Analysis available
-7
W
GSW GSW 115
113 HOU HOU
Mar 5 Analysis available
+2
L
LAC LAC 114
101 GSW GSW
Mar 2 Analysis available
-13
L
LAL LAL 129
101 GSW GSW
Feb 28 Analysis available
-28
W
GSW GSW 133
112 MEM MEM
Feb 25 Analysis available
+21
L
GSW GSW 109
113 NOP NOP
Feb 24 Analysis available
-4
W
DEN DEN 117
128 GSW GSW
Feb 22 Analysis available
+11
L
BOS BOS 121
110 GSW GSW
Feb 19 Analysis available
-11
L
SAS SAS 126
113 GSW GSW
Feb 11 Analysis available
-13
W
MEM MEM 113
114 GSW GSW
Feb 9 Analysis available
+1
L
GSW GSW 99
105 LAL LAL
Feb 7 Analysis available
-6
W
GSW GSW 101
97 PHX PHX
Feb 5 Analysis available
+4
L
PHI PHI 113
94 GSW GSW
Feb 3 Analysis available
-19
L
DET DET 131
124 GSW GSW
Jan 30 Analysis available
-7
W
GSW GSW 140
124 UTA UTA
Jan 28 Analysis available
+16
L
GSW GSW 83
108 MIN MIN
Jan 27 Analysis available
-25
W
GSW GSW 111
85 MIN MIN
Jan 25 Analysis available
+26
L
GSW GSW 115
123 DAL DAL
Jan 23 Analysis available
-8
L
TOR TOR 145
127 GSW GSW
Jan 21 Analysis available
-18
W
MIA MIA 112
135 GSW GSW
Jan 20 Analysis available
+23
W
CHA CHA 116
136 GSW GSW
Jan 18 Analysis available
+20
W
NYK NYK 113
126 GSW GSW
Jan 16 Analysis available
+13
W
POR POR 97
119 GSW GSW
Jan 14 Analysis available
+22
L
ATL ATL 124
111 GSW GSW
Jan 12 Analysis available
-13
W
SAC SAC 103
137 GSW GSW
Jan 10 Analysis available
+34
W
MIL MIL 113
120 GSW GSW
Jan 8 Analysis available
+7
L
GSW GSW 102
103 LAC LAC
Jan 6 Analysis available
-1
W
UTA UTA 114
123 GSW GSW
Jan 4 Analysis available
+9
L
OKC OKC 131
94 GSW GSW
Jan 3 Analysis available
-37
W
GSW GSW 132
125 CHA CHA
Dec 31 Analysis available
+7
W
GSW GSW 120
107 BKN BKN
Dec 30 Analysis available
+13
L
GSW GSW 127
141 TOR TOR
Dec 28 Analysis available
-14
W
DAL DAL 116
126 GSW GSW
Dec 25 Analysis available
+10
W
ORL ORL 97
120 GSW GSW
Dec 23 Analysis available
+23
W
PHX PHX 116
119 GSW GSW
Dec 21 Analysis available
+3
L
GSW GSW 98
99 PHX PHX
Dec 19 Analysis available
-1
L
GSW GSW 131
136 POR POR
Dec 15 Analysis available
-5
L
MIN MIN 127
120 GSW GSW
Dec 13 Analysis available
-7
W
GSW GSW 123
91 CHI CHI
Dec 8 Analysis available
+32
W
GSW GSW 99
94 CLE CLE
Dec 7 Analysis available
+5
L
GSW GSW 98
99 PHI PHI
Dec 5 Analysis available
-1
L
OKC OKC 124
112 GSW GSW
Dec 3 Analysis available
-12
W
NOP NOP 96
104 GSW GSW
Nov 30 Analysis available
+8
L
HOU HOU 104
100 GSW GSW
Nov 27 Analysis available
-4
W
UTA UTA 117
134 GSW GSW
Nov 25 Analysis available
+17
L
POR POR 127
123 GSW GSW
Nov 22 Analysis available
-4
L
GSW GSW 96
110 MIA MIA
Nov 20 Analysis available
-14
L
GSW GSW 113
121 ORL ORL
Nov 19 Analysis available
-8
W
GSW GSW 124
106 NOP NOP
Nov 17 Analysis available
+18
W
GSW GSW 109
108 SAS SAS
Nov 15 Analysis available
+1
W
GSW GSW 125
120 SAS SAS
Nov 13 Analysis available
+5
L
GSW GSW 102
126 OKC OKC
Nov 12 Analysis available
-24
W
IND IND 83
114 GSW GSW
Nov 10 Analysis available
+31
L
GSW GSW 104
129 DEN DEN
Nov 8 Analysis available
-25
L
GSW GSW 116
121 SAC SAC
Nov 6 Analysis available
-5
W
PHX PHX 107
118 GSW GSW
Nov 5 Analysis available
+11
L
GSW GSW 109
114 IND IND
Nov 1 Analysis available
-5
L
GSW GSW 110
120 MIL MIL
Oct 31 Analysis available
-10
W
LAC LAC 79
98 GSW GSW
Oct 29 Analysis available
+19
W
MEM MEM 115
131 GSW GSW
Oct 27 Analysis available
+16
L
GSW GSW 119
139 POR POR
Oct 24 Analysis available
-20
W
DEN DEN 131
137 GSW GSW
Oct 23 Analysis available
+6
W
GSW GSW 119
109 LAL LAL
Oct 21 Analysis available
+10