POR

2025-26 Season

TOUMANI CAMARA

Portland Trail Blazers | Forward | 6-7
Toumani Camara
13.3 PPG
5.1 RPG
2.4 APG
33.3 MPG
+2.9 Impact

Camara produces at an above average rate for a 33-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+2.9
Scoring +11.6
Points 13.3 PPG = +8.3
Shot Making above expected FG% = +3.3
Creation +0.6
Creation 2.4 AST/g = +0.6
Turnovers -4.1
Turnovers 1.7/g = -4.1
Defense +0.4
Defense 1.2 STL, 0.4 BLK = +0.4
Hustle & Effort +4.8
Rebounds 5.1 RPG = +4.8
Raw Impact +13.3
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.4
Net Impact
+2.9
68th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 234 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 71th
13.3 PPG
Efficiency 50th
56.8% TS
Playmaking 71th
2.4 APG
Rebounding 65th
5.1 RPG
Defense 96th
+12.4/g
Hustle 48th
+11.7/g
Creation 43th
+2.19/g
Shot Making 90th
+8.95/g
TO Discipline 37th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

A maddening tug-of-war between relentless defensive energy and destructive shot selection completely defined Toumani Camara's first twenty games. When he embraced his role as a gritty connector, the results were stellar. Look at his performance vs MIN on 10/22, where a quiet 10-point outing still yielded a +5.2 impact score because he suffocated opposing ball-handlers and generated crucial extra possessions. Too often, however, Camara hijacked the offense with ill-advised perimeter barrages that actively harmed his team. During a rough outing vs MIA on 11/08, he launched 13 three-pointers, making just three, which cratered his overall value to a brutal -15.3 impact score despite his usual high-motor rebounding. Even when his shots actually fell, hidden costs sometimes ruined his night. He dropped a solid 16 points vs HOU on 11/14, yet posted an abysmal -16.6 impact score because poorly timed fouls and defensive breakdowns gave away every bit of value he created on the offensive end. If Camara wants to stay on the floor, he must stop forcing the issue and get back to starring in his role.

A maddening inconsistency defined Toumani Camara’s midseason stretch. Volatile shot selection and hidden defensive costs frequently sabotaged his overall effectiveness. Take the 12/26 vs LAC matchup as a prime example of this hollow production. He poured in 20 points but registered a dismal -14.3 impact score because he stubbornly chucked high-volume attempts from beyond the arc. He repeated this frustrating pattern on 01/03 vs SAS. Despite dropping another 20 points, he posted a -6.3 impact mark because poor transition defense and costly mistakes entirely wiped out his blistering perimeter efficiency. Yet, he occasionally found ways to tilt the floor without relying on his jumper. On 01/07 vs HOU, he scored a modest 14 points but earned a +3.2 impact score through pure effort and game-changing hustle plays.

Toumani Camara’s midseason stretch was defined by maddening volatility, swinging wildly between flawless offensive execution and outright self-sabotage. He reached his absolute ceiling on 02/09 vs PHI, pouring in 30 points on 8-of-10 shooting from deep to post a monstrous +21.7 impact score. Even when his jumper abandoned him, he could still generate positive value through sheer hustle. During his 02/07 vs MEM appearance, he managed just 8 points on a brutal 3-for-10 from the field, yet earned a +2.5 impact mark by transforming into a menace on the offensive glass. However, hidden costs frequently dragged down his seemingly productive nights. Look at his outing on 01/27 vs WAS. A solid 16-point, nine-rebound line masked a -1.2 impact score driven entirely by severe ball security issues and costly defensive fouls. When Camara plays within himself, he is a devastating two-way weapon, but his erratic decision-making remains a glaring hurdle.

A brutal shooting slump eventually gave way to a blistering hot streak, defining a wildly volatile stretch of basketball for Toumani Camara. His jumper completely abandoned him during the Mar 04 vs MEM matchup, where a disastrous 0-for-7 blanking from beyond the arc tanked his impact score to a dismal -5.2. Chucking up bricks from the perimeter routinely derailed his overall value during those early weeks, masking the fact that his defensive motor rarely idled. The offensive floodgates finally opened on Mar 23 vs BKN. Camara erupted for 35 points on a staggering 9-of-11 from deep, generating a massive +33.2 impact score by utterly shattering Brooklyn's defensive scheme. Yet, he remained highly effective even when the scoring cooled off again. During the Mar 25 vs MIL game, he managed just 10 points but still posted a +7.2 impact score. He salvaged his overall value that night by generating elite activity in the passing lanes and crashing the offensive glass for a +8.9 hustle mark, perfectly illustrating his gritty two-way floor.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Camara's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 41% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Camara consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: +1.0, second-half: +4.8. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 6 games. Longest cold streak: 4 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 77 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

K. Durant 136.3 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 41.7%
PPP 0.15
PTS 21
FG% 30.0%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 7
S. Curry 80.3 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 10
P. Banchero 64.9 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 9
C. Flagg 61.6 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 8
J. Brown 60.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 4
J. Johnson 59.3 poss
FG% 22.2%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 4
K. Leonard 58.2 poss
FG% 36.4%
3P% 42.9%
PPP 0.19
PTS 11
D. DeRozan 57.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 5
D. DiVincenzo 56.8 poss
FG% 36.4%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 10

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

K. Durant 151.4 poss
FG% 54.5%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.28
PTS 43
FG% 65.5%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.37
PTS 51
S. Curry 110.0 poss
FG% 47.4%
3P% 45.5%
PPP 0.23
PTS 25
A. Edwards 103.1 poss
FG% 45.8%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 30
J. Brown 91.9 poss
FG% 63.6%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.34
PTS 31
D. DeRozan 85.3 poss
FG% 52.9%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 20
J. Johnson 77.1 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.03
PTS 2
J. Brunson 74.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 12
C. Flagg 69.6 poss
FG% 41.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 15
J. Harden 61.9 poss
FG% 71.4%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 15

SEASON STATS

83
Games
13.3
PPG
5.1
RPG
2.4
APG
1.2
SPG
0.4
BPG
43.9
FG%
36.9
3P%
70.8
FT%
33.3
MPG

GAME LOG

83 games played