GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

Share Post

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

PHX Phoenix Suns
S Jalen Green 38.7m
35
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+11.4

An unstoppable scoring barrage (+24.1) completely overpowered a catastrophic string of live-ball giveaways (-11.8 turnover penalty). He routinely buried contested jumpers to amass a massive +7.9 shot-making bonus, single-handedly carrying the offense through sheer talent. The maddening duality of his game was on full display, blending breathtaking shot creation with disastrous decision-making.

Shooting
FG 14/29 (48.3%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 55.3%
USG% 42.9%
Net Rtg -4.9
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.7m
Scoring +24.1
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +7.9
Hustle +1.5
Defense -0.1
Turnovers -11.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 5
S Devin Booker 37.6m
22
pts
1
reb
4
ast
Impact
+0.4

Damaging defensive lapses (-2.9) and sloppy ball security (-4.7 turnovers) entirely erased a highly productive scoring night (+12.6). He hit difficult isolation looks (+4.0 shot making), but his stubborn, ball-stopping habits allowed opponents to capitalize in transition. This volatile mix of offensive mastery and hidden costs perfectly mirrors his erratic mid-season campaign.

Shooting
FG 7/17 (41.2%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 8/13 (61.5%)
Advanced
TS% 48.4%
USG% 27.6%
Net Rtg -5.5
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.6m
Scoring +12.6
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +4.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -2.9
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Dillon Brooks 36.6m
20
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
+22.5

Brilliant two-way dominance defined this outing, combining suffocating point-of-attack resistance (+4.9 defense) with highly efficient volume scoring (+17.1). He relentlessly attacked the glass (+8.9 hustle) and converted tough looks (+3.8 shot making) without hijacking possessions. Shedding his usual erratic shot-hunting, he operated as a terrifying, high-leverage enforcer.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 79.1%
USG% 16.9%
Net Rtg +17.1
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.6m
Scoring +17.1
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +8.9
Defense +4.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 47.4%
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 1
S Jordan Goodwin 28.6m
12
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.7

Chaotic ball-handling (-4.7 turnover penalty) actively sabotaged a highly effective scoring burst (+8.5). He knocked down difficult perimeter looks to generate a +3.2 shot-making bonus, but his erratic decision-making constantly derailed the offense. This performance was a classic example of his wild, boom-or-bust nature as a bench sparkplug.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 1/3 (33.3%)
Advanced
TS% 72.1%
USG% 15.9%
Net Rtg +2.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.6m
Scoring +8.5
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +3.2
Hustle +2.2
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Mark Williams 22.2m
4
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-2.3

A sudden lack of interior dominance severely limited his influence, as he failed to generate his usual terrifying rim deterrence (-0.1 defense). While he remained active on the glass (+4.1 hustle), his low-volume offensive output (+3.4 scoring) prevented him from punishing the opposing frontcourt. This muted performance was a stark departure from his brute-force midseason takeovers.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 6.3%
Net Rtg +0.7
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.2m
Scoring +3.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +4.1
Defense -0.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 3
TO 0
7
pts
8
reb
3
ast
Impact
+7.9

Game-wrecking defensive execution (+7.3) completely defined his performance, as he suffocated opponents on the perimeter without committing fouls. He embraced his role as a vital two-way glue guy, chipping in timely rebounds (+4.3 hustle) and hitting his open looks (+2.0 shot making). Avoiding his usual empty-calorie shot hunting, he operated flawlessly within the flow of the offense.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 70.0%
USG% 8.9%
Net Rtg -22.8
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.5m
Scoring +5.4
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +4.3
Defense +7.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 0
Oso Ighodaro 23.3m
3
pts
1
reb
6
ast
Impact
-14.2

Disastrous decision-making as a short-roll hub (-5.4 turnover penalty) completely cratered his overall value. He failed to anchor the paint defensively (-0.8) and operated as an invisible passenger on the glass (+0.3 hustle). This performance highlighted his maddening inconsistency, swinging wildly from a flawless rim-runner to an outright offensive liability.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.1%
USG% 9.4%
Net Rtg +9.1
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.3m
Scoring +1.8
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
5
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.3

Brutal perimeter inefficiency severely capped his scoring impact (+2.9), turning him into an offensive wild card who struggled to generate momentum. He managed to salvage some value through relentless rebounding (+4.1 hustle) and gritty point-of-attack defense (+1.3). Ultimately, his erratic decision-making and shooting woes mirrored the catastrophic slumps that cost him his starting job.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.2%
USG% 12.0%
Net Rtg -2.6
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.3m
Scoring +2.9
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +4.1
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
Ryan Dunn 9.2m
2
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-5.2

Crippling offensive passivity (+1.2 scoring) allowed opposing defenses to completely ignore him on the perimeter, torpedoing the team's spacing. He crashed the glass effectively (+5.1 hustle), but his failure to generate any defensive chaos (+0.2) removed his primary utility. This invisible, low-usage outing perfectly encapsulated the frustrating growing pains of his rookie campaign.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 8.7%
Net Rtg -41.5
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.2m
Scoring +1.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +5.1
Defense +0.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 80.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
POR Portland Trail Blazers
S Jrue Holiday 38.4m
21
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
+1.8

Severe ball-security issues (-9.5 turnover penalty) and uncharacteristic defensive lapses (-1.9) nearly erased a brilliant shooting display. He generated a robust +12.8 scoring impact fueled by difficult conversions (+5.4 shot making), but sloppy decision-making constantly derailed momentum. The veteran's high-volume gunning mirrored his maddening mid-season volatility.

Shooting
FG 7/18 (38.9%)
3PT 4/11 (36.4%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.1%
USG% 24.5%
Net Rtg -5.5
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.4m
Scoring +12.8
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +5.4
Hustle +5.1
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 4
S Deni Avdija 38.2m
41
pts
7
reb
12
ast
Impact
+25.0

An explosive scoring barrage (+33.2) carried his overall value despite a catastrophic string of giveaways (-13.2 turnover penalty). He relentlessly punished mismatches to generate a massive +9.3 shot-making bonus, completely offsetting his sloppy ball security. This offensive focal-point role mirrors his volatile mid-season stretch, but here the sheer volume of difficult conversions won out.

Shooting
FG 15/22 (68.2%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 8/13 (61.5%)
Advanced
TS% 74.0%
USG% 32.3%
Net Rtg +13.6
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.2m
Scoring +33.2
Creation +3.7
Shot Making +9.3
Hustle +2.1
Defense +0.4
Turnovers -13.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 5
S Toumani Camara 36.3m
8
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.9

Defensive disruption (+4.2) kept him afloat on a night where his offensive gravity completely vanished. A severe drop in scoring volume limited his overall influence, though a respectable +2.2 shot-making mark indicates he hit the few looks he actually took. His performance reverted to the gritty, low-usage connector role that defined his early-season struggles.

Shooting
FG 3/9 (33.3%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 44.4%
USG% 11.4%
Net Rtg -8.3
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.3m
Scoring +3.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +2.2
Defense +4.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 1
S Donovan Clingan 28.6m
2
pts
11
reb
4
ast
Impact
+5.1

Absolute dominance on the glass fueled a massive +14.0 hustle rating, entirely salvaging a nearly invisible scoring output (-1.8). He dictated the terms of engagement strictly through physical intimidation and rebounding, completely ignoring the offensive end. This performance perfectly encapsulated his early-season identity as a terrifying interior anchor whose value doesn't rely on shot attempts.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 16.7%
USG% 9.0%
Net Rtg +14.3
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.6m
Scoring -1.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +14.0
Defense +2.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 53.8%
STL 1
BLK 3
TO 0
S Scoot Henderson 17.2m
9
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-0.8

Hidden costs from reckless decisions (-4.7 turnover penalty) dragged down an otherwise balanced two-way effort. While he provided solid rebounding (+3.8 hustle) and point-of-attack resistance (+2.1 defense), his inability to orchestrate cleanly stifled the offense. This erratic floor-general act continues a season-long pattern of self-sabotage masking his raw physical tools.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 65.4%
USG% 22.0%
Net Rtg +26.1
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.2m
Scoring +6.9
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +3.8
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 2
12
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-3.6

Disastrous decision-making (-4.7 turnover penalty) completely negated a highly efficient scoring punch (+9.7). He flashed his explosive potential by converting tough looks (+2.6 shot making), but his erratic ball security routinely killed offensive momentum. This frustrating duality perfectly mirrors the catastrophic shot selection and sloppy play that plagued his early campaign.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 76.1%
USG% 18.5%
Net Rtg +32.0
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.3m
Scoring +9.7
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +2.6
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Jerami Grant 19.1m
16
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
+4.1

Efficient isolation scoring (+11.1) drove his positive impact, as he consistently knocked down contested looks (+3.9 shot making). Unlike his destructive early-season habits, he avoided hijacking possessions and chipped in with timely defensive rotations (+1.7). The result was a clean, effective performance that maximized his role as a secondary offensive weapon.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 4/8 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 62.1%
USG% 32.6%
Net Rtg -1.5
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.1m
Scoring +11.1
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +0.6
Defense +1.7
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
2
pts
7
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.0

Despite a strong effort on the glass (+6.0 hustle), his complete lack of offensive gravity (-2.1 scoring) allowed defenders to entirely ignore him. He failed to warp the geometry of the court as a lob threat, neutralizing the terrifying rim deterrence that usually defines his game. The resulting spacing issues severely handicapped the second unit's half-court execution.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 16.7%
USG% 13.6%
Net Rtg -41.2
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.2m
Scoring -2.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +6.0
Defense +0.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
3
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.7

A shocking lack of defensive disruption (-2.6) completely ruined his value, removing the only reliable tool in his arsenal. Without his usual game-wrecking chaos on the perimeter, his total offensive invisibility left him as a severe net negative. He simply floated through his minutes as a non-factor, failing to register a single hustle or creation metric.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 7.1%
Net Rtg -38.5
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.8m
Scoring +2.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -2.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
Kris Murray 12.1m
0
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
-7.9

Extreme offensive passivity resulted in a flat zero for scoring impact, allowing his defender to completely abandon him to clog the paint. While he managed to crash the glass effectively (+3.8 hustle), his defensive lapses (-1.1) compounded his invisibility on the other end. He routinely floated around the perimeter as a non-factor, echoing his dreadful midseason stretch.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +43.8
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.1m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +3.8
Defense -1.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0