DEN

2025-26 Season

SPENCER JONES

Denver Nuggets | Forward | 6-7
Spencer Jones
5.5 PPG
3.2 RPG
0.8 APG
21.9 MPG
-5.3 Impact

Jones produces at an poor rate for a 22-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-5.3
Scoring +5.0
Points 5.5 PPG = +3.7
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.3
Creation +0.3
Creation 0.8 AST/g = +0.3
Turnovers -1.2
Turnovers 0.5/g = -1.2
Defense -0.7
Defense 0.8 STL, 0.4 BLK = -0.7
Hustle & Effort +3.1
Rebounds 3.2 RPG = +3.1
Raw Impact +6.5
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.8
Net Impact
-5.3
15th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 234 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 21th
5.8 PPG
Efficiency 53th
56.9% TS
Playmaking 13th
0.8 APG
Rebounding 33th
3.4 RPG
Defense 28th
+5.4/g
Hustle 39th
+10.8/g
Creation 24th
+1.71/g
Shot Making 51th
+5.88/g
TO Discipline 96th
0.02/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Spencer Jones's first twenty games were defined by a drastic role change that transformed him from an invisible bench warmer into a wildly volatile starter. He initially scraped by on the fringes of the rotation, managing a +4.7 impact score on 11/19 vs NOP despite scoring exactly zero points. That surprising positive rating stemmed entirely from sheer effort and brilliant defensive positioning, allowing him to create tangible value without even attempting a field goal. His sudden promotion to the starting unit, however, exposed glaring defensive liabilities against quicker guards. This was painfully obvious on 11/22 vs SAC, where an inability to stay in front of his assignment at the point of attack dragged him to a catastrophic -16.2 impact mark. Fortunately, he eventually found his rhythm as an offensive focal point a few weeks later. Catching fire from the perimeter on 12/01 vs DAL, Jones poured in 28 points and completely altered the defense's geometry to earn a dominant +12.1 impact score.

Spencer Jones spent this stretch trapped in a maddening Jekyll-and-Hyde routine, oscillating wildly between lethal perimeter sniping and catastrophic decision-making. His box score frequently lied. Look no further than the 01/20 vs LAL matchup, where a 16-point outburst was completely ruined by late-game defensive miscommunications that dragged his impact down to a dismal -3.1. Even when he finished efficiently inside on 01/14 vs DAL, a brutal string of live-ball turnovers erased his 10 points and resulted in a terrible -9.3 impact score. Yet, he could occasionally flip the script and win minutes without scoring. During the 01/04 vs BKN game, Jones managed a meager three points but still posted a +3.4 impact because his suffocating effort yielded a +9.1 defensive rating. Ultimately, these brilliant flashes of situational value were too often buried under awful shot selection and passive stretches.

A suffocating offensive slump and a subsequent demotion to the bench defined Spencer Jones's midseason stretch. He began this period as a starter but immediately cratered on 01/29 vs BKN, posting a catastrophic -12.3 impact score driven by a complete failure to connect on any field goal attempts. Opposing defenses quickly realized they could simply abandon him in the halfcourt. This glaring passivity was painfully obvious on 03/20 vs TOR, where operating as an absolute ghost offensively dragged his impact down to -5.3 despite a four-assist effort. He did offer one fleeting glimpse of two-way dominance during a spot start on 03/12 vs SAS. An unexpected 19-point offensive explosion paired with relentless point-of-attack defense fueled a massive +12.2 impact score. Unfortunately, that aggressive mindset vanished just as quickly as it arrived.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Jones has posted negative impact in 82% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 72% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Average defender. Jones doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

In a rough stretch — 8 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 14 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 68 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

K. Durant 73.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 8
C. Flagg 55.6 poss
FG% 85.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 13
P. Banchero 51.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 8
J. Smith Jr. 48.4 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 4
K. Middleton 44.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 3
R. Nembhard 44.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 7
M. Bridges 39.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
M. Porter Jr. 37.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
N. Reid 36.0 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
J. Harden 35.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 7

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

K. Durant 75.1 poss
FG% 70.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.28
PTS 21
C. Flagg 63.4 poss
FG% 58.8%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.35
PTS 22
K. Leonard 46.6 poss
FG% 61.5%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.41
PTS 19
P. Banchero 41.8 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.38
PTS 16
J. Randle 41.3 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 7
A. Sengun 39.4 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 8
R. Sheppard 34.3 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 8
J. Embiid 33.2 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 5
R. Nembhard 31.3 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 4
N. Marshall 29.4 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 8

SEASON STATS

65
Games
5.5
PPG
3.2
RPG
0.8
APG
0.8
SPG
0.4
BPG
50.6
FG%
40.0
3P%
61.1
FT%
21.9
MPG

GAME LOG

65 games played