WAS

2025-26 Season

SHARIFE COOPER

Washington Wizards | Guard | 6-0
Sharife Cooper
8.1 PPG
2.1 RPG
3.0 APG
17.1 MPG
-4.8 Impact

Cooper produces at an below average rate for a 17-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-4.8
Scoring +7.7
Points 8.1 PPG = +5.9
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.8
Creation +0.7
Creation 3.0 AST/g = +0.7
Turnovers -3.5
Turnovers 1.5/g = -3.5
Defense -0.4
Defense 0.4 STL, 0.1 BLK = -0.4
Hustle & Effort +1.4
Rebounds 2.1 RPG = +1.4
Raw Impact +5.9
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.7
Net Impact
-4.8
26th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 245 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 52th
9.7 PPG
Efficiency 85th
59.5% TS
Playmaking 66th
3.5 APG
Rebounding 39th
2.5 RPG
Defense 54th
+7.6/g
Hustle 34th
+7.6/g
Creation 49th
+2.74/g
Shot Making 29th
+5.10/g
TO Discipline 13th
0.09/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Empty-calorie scoring and catastrophic defensive bleeding defined a deeply frustrating stretch for Sharife Cooper. After spending the early winter as a bench-warming afterthought, he finally earned real rotational minutes in February but routinely gave back every point he generated. Look no further than his 18-point outing on 02/05 vs DET. Despite the shiny offensive numbers, he posted a disastrous -9.8 impact score because his constant bleeding of points in transition completely erased his scoring value. His point-of-attack liabilities were even more glaring during a 02/24 vs ATL matchup, where he managed just 7 points and dragged the second unit down with a brutal -11.6 impact score. Yet, just when his rotation spot seemed completely doomed, Cooper flipped the script on 03/02 vs HOU. He poured in 21 points on highly efficient 8-for-10 shooting and generated a massive +12.4 impact score, finally driving winning basketball by slicing through the defensive shell with elite burst and impeccable decision-making.

This stretch of the season was defined by empty-calorie scoring and glaring defensive liabilities that routinely sabotaged the second unit. Even when Cooper filled the box score, hidden costs dragged him down. He poured in 17 points on Apr 07 vs CHI, but a porous defensive effort bled points at the point of attack, resulting in a brutal -14.4 impact score. Similarly, during Mar 25 vs UTA, another 17-point outing was entirely undone by defensive concessions and live-ball mistakes that yielded a -11.3 impact. When his shot wasn't falling, things got even uglier. On Mar 21 vs OKC, Cooper's offensive rhythm completely collapsed into forced shots, generating a disastrous -18.6 impact. Yet, he occasionally found ways to contribute without dominating the ball. During a brief cameo on Apr 05 vs BKN, he scored just two points but posted a +4.2 impact simply by applying relentless point-of-attack pressure that disrupted the opposing offense.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Cooper has posted negative impact in 76% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 62% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 3 games. Longest cold streak: 9 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 42 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

T. Peter 43.1 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 11
M. Sasser 40.0 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 9
D. Jenkins 38.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
K. Jakučionis 31.8 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 4
A. Thompson 30.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 4
K. Chandler 24.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.12
PTS 3
G. Vincent 21.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Jones 18.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 1
T. Kolek 18.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 4
R. Holland II 18.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

M. Sasser 34.8 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 10
T. Peter 31.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.19
PTS 6
D. Jenkins 26.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Jones 26.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
K. Chandler 25.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 4
K. Jakučionis 24.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.37
PTS 9
D. Robinson 21.1 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.43
PTS 9
B. James 20.0 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 4
G. Vincent 20.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
R. Holland II 19.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

41
Games
8.1
PPG
2.1
RPG
3.0
APG
0.4
SPG
0.1
BPG
51.4
FG%
38.2
3P%
83.3
FT%
17.1
MPG

GAME LOG

41 games played