GAME ANALYSIS

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

BKN Brooklyn Nets
S E.J. Liddell 29.7m
15
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
-0.6

A massive scoring surge from his recent slump was offset by critical rotational mistakes on the defensive end. He frequently found himself caught in no-man's land during pick-and-roll coverages, conceding easy pocket passes. The impressive shooting efficiency was ultimately neutralized by the defensive breakdowns he surrendered.

Shooting
FG 5/7 (71.4%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 85.6%
USG% 17.1%
Net Rtg +13.1
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.7m
Offense +10.4
Hustle +3.0
Defense +1.4
Raw total +14.8
Avg player in 29.7m -15.4
Impact -0.6
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 3
S Drake Powell 29.4m
13
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
+5.3

Wreaked havoc in the passing lanes, utilizing his length to blow up dribble hand-offs and force live-ball turnovers. His defensive anticipation was elite, directly fueling multiple fast-break opportunities. Combined with a disciplined shot profile, his two-way connectivity was a major catalyst for the unit.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 59.7%
USG% 15.9%
Net Rtg +21.7
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.4m
Offense +9.9
Hustle +3.9
Defense +6.8
Raw total +20.6
Avg player in 29.4m -15.3
Impact +5.3
How is this calculated?
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 0
S Nolan Traore 28.2m
23
pts
2
reb
7
ast
Impact
-0.2

A heavy reliance on perimeter isolation plays led to a volatile offensive performance that ultimately broke even. While he hit several tough, contested triples, his overall inefficiency on drives bogged down the team's spacing. Giving away possessions through forced passes in traffic prevented his scoring outburst from yielding a positive net rating.

Shooting
FG 7/18 (38.9%)
3PT 5/11 (45.5%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.2%
USG% 34.3%
Net Rtg +12.4
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.2m
Offense +11.5
Hustle +1.2
Defense +1.6
Raw total +14.3
Avg player in 28.2m -14.5
Impact -0.2
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
S Jalen Wilson 25.7m
19
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
+6.5

Capitalized brilliantly on hard closeouts, utilizing decisive straight-line drives to collapse the defense. His offensive efficiency spiked dramatically compared to recent outings, driven by excellent spatial awareness in the half-court. He consistently made the right read, ensuring his high usage translated directly to positive team momentum.

Shooting
FG 6/9 (66.7%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 81.6%
USG% 22.0%
Net Rtg +19.2
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.7m
Offense +16.8
Hustle +1.4
Defense +1.6
Raw total +19.8
Avg player in 25.7m -13.3
Impact +6.5
How is this calculated?
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Chaney Johnson 21.3m
9
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
+4.6

Anchored his positive impact through disciplined weak-side rim protection and timely defensive rotations. He maintained his streak of highly efficient finishing by strictly taking high-percentage looks around the basket. A steady diet of contested rebounds and smart closeouts kept his overall value firmly in the green.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 76.5%
USG% 14.6%
Net Rtg +19.1
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.3m
Offense +8.8
Hustle +2.5
Defense +4.2
Raw total +15.5
Avg player in 21.3m -10.9
Impact +4.6
How is this calculated?
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 1
Trevon Scott 28.1m
4
pts
8
reb
3
ast
Impact
-0.4

Operated primarily as a connective piece, making solid extra passes and setting bruising screens to free up shooters. His strong defensive metrics reflect excellent post-up denial, but his extreme passivity on offense allowed defenders to sag off him. This lack of scoring gravity clogged the paint, resulting in a nearly neutral overall impact.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 40.0%
USG% 7.2%
Net Rtg +3.0
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.1m
Offense +7.1
Hustle +2.7
Defense +4.4
Raw total +14.2
Avg player in 28.1m -14.6
Impact -0.4
How is this calculated?
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 0
2
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
-10.1

An abysmal shooting night completely cratered his offensive value, as defenders routinely ignored him on the perimeter. His insistence on taking heavily contested jumpers early in the clock repeatedly killed the team's momentum. Despite offering some resistance on defense, his inability to stretch the floor or protect the ball resulted in a disastrous net score.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 16.7%
USG% 14.0%
Net Rtg -31.0
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.2m
Offense -2.4
Hustle +0.2
Defense +3.1
Raw total +0.9
Avg player in 21.2m -11.0
Impact -10.1
How is this calculated?
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
9
pts
0
reb
4
ast
Impact
-1.8

Struggled to navigate ball screens defensively, frequently dying on picks and forcing teammates into emergency rotations. His offensive execution was adequate, but he failed to generate any meaningful rim pressure to collapse the defense. The lack of defensive resistance at the point of attack ultimately dragged his impact into the red.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 65.4%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg +2.6
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.8m
Offense +6.4
Hustle +1.9
Defense +0.1
Raw total +8.4
Avg player in 19.8m -10.2
Impact -1.8
How is this calculated?
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Josh Minott 18.3m
15
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
+11.7

Completely changed the complexion of the game with a relentless barrage of hustle plays and offensive putbacks. His elite defensive rating was earned by switching seamlessly across multiple positions and blowing up pick-and-rolls. This high-energy, two-way dominance maximized his impact despite playing under twenty minutes.

Shooting
FG 6/11 (54.5%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 60.9%
USG% 31.7%
Net Rtg -2.6
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.3m
Offense +9.5
Hustle +4.7
Defense +6.9
Raw total +21.1
Avg player in 18.3m -9.4
Impact +11.7
How is this calculated?
STL 2
BLK 3
TO 1
Ochai Agbaji 18.3m
12
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+3.7

Bounced back from a brutal shooting slump by aggressively attacking closeouts and finishing through contact. He showcased excellent defensive discipline by staying down on pump fakes and contesting cleanly on the perimeter. His decisive, no-hesitation decision-making provided a much-needed stabilizing presence for the second unit.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 54.5%
USG% 26.8%
Net Rtg -2.6
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.3m
Offense +9.4
Hustle +1.3
Defense +2.5
Raw total +13.2
Avg player in 18.3m -9.5
Impact +3.7
How is this calculated?
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
WAS Washington Wizards
S Julian Reese 43.8m
17
pts
16
reb
1
ast
Impact
+1.5

Dominant interior positioning defined his night, as he continuously generated second-chance opportunities through relentless offensive rebounding. His massive defensive impact score reflects superb rim deterrence and verticality against driving guards. However, a handful of empty possessions and missed putbacks kept his net rating from soaring higher.

Shooting
FG 8/16 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/5 (20.0%)
Advanced
TS% 46.7%
USG% 20.4%
Net Rtg -13.0
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 43.8m
Offense +9.5
Hustle +4.9
Defense +9.8
Raw total +24.2
Avg player in 43.8m -22.7
Impact +1.5
How is this calculated?
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 4
S Jamir Watkins 43.7m
20
pts
8
reb
2
ast
Impact
-9.8

Despite an efficient scoring surge well above his recent averages, his overall impact plummeted into the negatives. This severe drop-off was driven by a barrage of live-ball turnovers that consistently ignited opponent fast breaks. His inability to protect the basketball completely negated his strong offensive execution in the half-court.

Shooting
FG 7/11 (63.6%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 4/6 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 73.3%
USG% 16.8%
Net Rtg -5.5
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 43.7m
Offense +8.1
Hustle +2.5
Defense +2.2
Raw total +12.8
Avg player in 43.7m -22.6
Impact -9.8
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 4
S Leaky Black 42.2m
8
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
-5.9

Elite defensive metrics highlight a performance where he completely locked down his primary assignment on the perimeter. Unfortunately, his offensive limitations dragged down his overall value, plagued by forced jumpers late in the shot clock. The massive disparity between his lockdown defense and clunky offensive execution created a net-negative result.

Shooting
FG 3/9 (33.3%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 44.4%
USG% 11.0%
Net Rtg -11.2
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 42.2m
Offense -0.5
Hustle +3.9
Defense +12.6
Raw total +16.0
Avg player in 42.2m -21.9
Impact -5.9
How is this calculated?
STL 5
BLK 0
TO 2
S Anthony Gill 41.0m
17
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
+4.1

Exceptional shot selection inside the arc anchored a highly efficient offensive showing. He consistently found the soft spots in the defensive rotation, punishing mismatches without forcing bad looks. A steady stream of disciplined box-outs and timely screens further solidified his positive overall footprint.

Shooting
FG 8/10 (80.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 81.4%
USG% 9.9%
Net Rtg -8.6
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 41.0m
Offense +21.2
Hustle +2.4
Defense +1.6
Raw total +25.2
Avg player in 41.0m -21.1
Impact +4.1
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
S Bub Carrington 17.2m
13
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
-3.1

A quick scoring burst off the bench was undermined by severe defensive lapses in pick-and-roll coverage. Opponents repeatedly targeted his drop coverage, generating easy floaters and wide-open looks. His inability to stay attached to ball-handlers erased the value of his highly efficient shooting.

Shooting
FG 6/8 (75.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 81.3%
USG% 30.0%
Net Rtg +10.5
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.2m
Offense +5.0
Hustle +0.7
Defense +0.1
Raw total +5.8
Avg player in 17.2m -8.9
Impact -3.1
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 4
Will Riley 35.1m
30
pts
4
reb
6
ast
Impact
-0.5

High-volume scoring masked a deeply flawed defensive showing that kept his net impact hovering around neutral. He consistently lost his man off the ball, yielding back-door cuts and uncontested corner threes. The offensive fireworks were spectacular, but giving up nearly as much as he generated on the other end capped his effectiveness.

Shooting
FG 9/16 (56.2%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 9/12 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 70.5%
USG% 28.1%
Net Rtg -11.0
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.1m
Offense +17.6
Hustle +1.4
Defense -1.4
Raw total +17.6
Avg player in 35.1m -18.1
Impact -0.5
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 4
Jaden Hardy 13.6m
8
pts
0
reb
3
ast
Impact
-8.9

Poor shot selection derailed his shift, as he repeatedly settled for contested, early-clock pull-ups instead of moving the defense. This offensive stagnation fed directly into transition opportunities for the other team. Lacking any hustle stats to compensate, his erratic decision-making proved highly detrimental.

Shooting
FG 2/8 (25.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 41.0%
USG% 38.7%
Net Rtg +10.7
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.6m
Offense -0.4
Hustle 0.0
Defense -1.5
Raw total -1.9
Avg player in 13.6m -7.0
Impact -8.9
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
2
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
+3.9

Made the most of a brief cameo by applying relentless point-of-attack pressure that disrupted the opponent's offensive rhythm. A quick pair of deflections in the backcourt highlighted his energetic stint. He provided a perfect spark-plug shift without making any costly mistakes.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +14.3
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.4m
Offense +2.5
Hustle +0.2
Defense +3.0
Raw total +5.7
Avg player in 3.4m -1.8
Impact +3.9
How is this calculated?
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0