POR

2025-26 Season

SHAEDON SHARPE

Portland Trail Blazers | Guard | 6-5
Shaedon Sharpe
20.7 PPG
4.3 RPG
2.6 APG
29.3 MPG
+6.9 Impact

Sharpe produces at an elite rate for a 29-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+6.9
Scoring +17.7
Points 20.7 PPG = +13.4
Shot Making above expected FG% = +4.3
Creation +1.3
Creation 2.6 AST/g = +1.3
Turnovers -6.8
Turnovers 2.9/g = -6.8
Defense +1.9
Defense 1.4 STL, 0.1 BLK = +1.9
Hustle & Effort +3.3
Rebounds 4.3 RPG = +3.3
Raw Impact +17.4
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.5
Net Impact
+6.9
85th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 245 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 93th
20.7 PPG
Efficiency 46th
54.4% TS
Playmaking 49th
2.6 APG
Rebounding 80th
4.3 RPG
Defense 87th
+11.2/g
Hustle 76th
+11.4/g
Creation 68th
+3.34/g
Shot Making 79th
+8.44/g
TO Discipline 8th
0.10/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

A maddening tug-of-war between breathtaking offensive flashes and catastrophic shot selection defined Shaedon Sharpe's first twenty games. His worst habits surfaced on 12/05 vs DET, where a hefty 28-point performance was entirely hollowed out, resulting in a negative -0.6 impact score. He severely suppressed his own value through a brutal volume-shooting approach, heavily taxing the offense by clanking his way to a 1-for-7 mark from beyond the arc. Conversely, Sharpe looked like a superstar on 11/12 vs NOP, posting a massive +22.3 impact by executing surgical, three-level shot-making to score 35 points. Defense occasionally saved him when his scoring volume dipped. On 11/05 vs OKC, he scored a modest 18 points but still generated a robust +9.6 impact through stifling perimeter defense and active passing-lane disruption. Unfortunately, his erratic decision-making ultimately cost him his starting job by late November. To escape a permanent bench role, he must abandon the empty-calorie chucking and commit to relentless downhill aggression.

A frustrating duality defined Shaedon Sharpe’s midseason stretch, as his explosive scoring potential constantly warred with disastrous shot selection. His worst habits surfaced on 01/03 vs SAS, where a brutal 3-for-16 shooting night and an overreliance on contested mid-range pull-ups torpedoed the offense for a dismal -17.6 impact score. Hidden costs often ruined his high-scoring nights. During the 01/18 vs SAC matchup, he poured in 27 points but posted a -5.8 impact score because his high-volume chucking and missed field goals completely stalled the offensive flow. Yet, when he abandoned the forced isolation jumpers and attacked the rim, he looked like an absolute star. He dropped 25 points on 01/17 vs LAL and generated a massive +15.0 impact score by aggressively slicing through the defense to create high-quality looks. He clearly has the physical talent to dominate. Now he just needs the fundamental discipline to match it.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Very consistent. Sharpe posts positive impact in 76% of games — you almost always get a productive night. Scoring varies by ~8 points, but the overall contribution stays positive.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 50% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Sharpe locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Small downward trend. First-half impact: +8.2, second-half: +5.6. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.

In a rough stretch — 6 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 6 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 70 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

A. Thompson 55.9 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 13
M. Bridges 54.2 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 10
M. Christie 51.0 poss
FG% 54.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 12
R. Westbrook 49.6 poss
FG% 58.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 15
J. Fears 47.5 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.57
PTS 27
P. Larsson 42.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
M. Moody 42.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 13
T. Eason 39.6 poss
FG% 63.6%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.45
PTS 18
K. Dunn 38.1 poss
FG% 22.2%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
J. Tyson 36.6 poss
FG% 30.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.22
PTS 8

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. LaRavia 64.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 4
J. Smith Jr. 63.0 poss
FG% 71.4%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 11
M. Bridges 56.7 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.04
PTS 2
R. Westbrook 51.7 poss
FG% 72.7%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 18
P. Larsson 41.6 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 6
M. Moody 41.1 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 9
J. Fears 37.7 poss
FG% 85.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.4
PTS 15
D. Wade 37.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Black 37.2 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 7
R. O'Neale 36.6 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.08
PTS 3

SEASON STATS

51
Games
20.7
PPG
4.3
RPG
2.6
APG
1.4
SPG
0.1
BPG
45.3
FG%
33.8
3P%
78.9
FT%
29.3
MPG

GAME LOG

51 games played