SAC

2025-26 Season

MAXIME RAYNAUD

Sacramento Kings | Center | 7-1
Maxime Raynaud
12.5 PPG
7.5 RPG
1.4 APG
26.5 MPG
+4.6 Impact

Raynaud produces at an above average rate for a 26-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+4.6
Scoring +11.8
Points 12.5 PPG = +9.4
Shot Making above expected FG% = +2.4
Creation +0.6
Creation 1.4 AST/g = +0.6
Turnovers -2.9
Turnovers 1.3/g = -2.9
Defense -1.0
Defense 0.5 STL, 0.5 BLK = -1.0
Hustle & Effort +7.1
Rebounds 7.5 RPG = +7.1
Raw Impact +15.6
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.0
Net Impact
+4.6
63th pctl vs Centers

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 93 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 74th
12.7 PPG
Efficiency 47th
58.7% TS
Playmaking 46th
1.4 APG
Rebounding 72th
7.7 RPG
Defense 38th
+5.2/g
Hustle 68th
+20.2/g
Creation 55th
+2.43/g
Shot Making 82th
+7.37/g
TO Discipline 54th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Maxime Raynaud’s first twenty games defined a jarring transition from an erratic bench warmer to a lethal, yet defensively flawed, starting big man. Early in the year, he found ways to contribute without the ball. He posted a +4.8 impact score on 11/07 vs OKC despite scoring just 8 points because his elite rebounding positioning and strong rim contests salvaged a highly inefficient shooting night. He eventually forced his way into the starting lineup by punishing smaller defenders on the block. That interior dominance peaked on 12/03 vs HOU, where he ruthlessly exploited mismatches to pour in 25 points and generate a massive +19.1 impact score. However, his defensive awareness remains a glaring liability that can erase his offensive production entirely. Even while grabbing 14 rebounds and scoring 12 points on 12/21 vs HOU, Raynaud suffered a brutal -6.3 impact score. He bled value on the other end of the floor by conceding easy looks in the paint and continually struggling with his defensive rotations.

A scorching stretch of interior dominance abruptly collapsed into a mid-winter slump that temporarily cost Maxime Raynaud his starting job. He opened this twenty-game window looking utterly unstoppable, punishing the paint on 12/27 vs DAL with 19 points on 9-for-15 shooting to post a massive +12.5 impact score. But that relentless aggression soon evaporated into passivity and forced shots. Even when his shooting numbers looked highly efficient on the surface, like his 11 points on 5-of-8 from the floor on 01/12 vs LAL, his overall influence slipped into the red (-2.2 impact) due to hidden costs elsewhere on the floor dragging him down. The bottom fell out completely on 01/25 vs DET. Relegated to the bench, his value cratered to a brutal -13.7 impact score as he bricked multiple wide-open perimeter looks and finished with just two points. Reinstated as a starter on 01/30 vs BOS, Raynaud finally found his footing again, pairing exceptional shot discipline with a relentless presence on the glass to grab 14 rebounds and score 14 points for a positive +2.8 impact.

This 20-game stretch was defined by absolute interior dominance that occasionally masked frustrating lapses in defensive awareness. Raynaud bullied his way to a monstrous +13.6 impact score during the 02/09 vs NOP matchup, racking up 21 points and 19 rebounds through sheer paint supremacy. He followed a similar blueprint on 03/03 vs PHX, putting on an absolute clinic in pick-and-roll execution to convert 10 of his 12 shots and generate a massive +17.1 impact mark. Yet, his box-score numbers sometimes painted a misleading picture of his actual value on the floor. Look no further than the 03/01 vs LAL contest, where a pristine 8-for-10 shooting night yielded a -3.6 impact score because hidden costs like turnovers and poor rotations completely undermined his 16 points and 13 rebounds. Similarly, his -7.5 rating on 03/05 vs NOP revealed how poor rotational timing can drag down a lineup even when a big man shoots efficiently. When he stays fully engaged on both ends, Raynaud is a terrifying interior force, but those subtle defensive drop-offs keep him from reaching his true ceiling.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Volatile for his role. Raynaud has noticeable ups and downs, with scoring moving ~8 points between games.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 79% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Defensive difference-maker. Raynaud consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: +1.2, second-half: +8.0. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Hot right now — 5 straight games with positive impact. Longest positive run this season: 11 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 76 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

A. Sengun 101.2 poss
FG% 47.4%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 19
D. Clingan 88.2 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 24
J. Huff 87.2 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 18
M. Williams 79.2 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 10
W. Carter Jr. 78.6 poss
FG% 83.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 13
B. Lopez 77.4 poss
FG% 91.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 23
D. Ayton 70.0 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 6
J. Landale 67.6 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 15
V. Wembanyama 63.9 poss
FG% 35.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 20
M. Diabaté 54.6 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 6

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

D. Clingan 104.5 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 22
A. Sengun 103.1 poss
FG% 63.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 37
M. Williams 79.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 11
J. Huff 76.7 poss
FG% 35.7%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 14
W. Carter Jr. 76.7 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 8
D. Ayton 76.2 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 13
J. Landale 66.3 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.24
PTS 16
V. Wembanyama 60.2 poss
FG% 56.5%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.55
PTS 33
Y. Missi 56.9 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 15
B. Lopez 55.5 poss
FG% 38.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 15

SEASON STATS

74
Games
12.5
PPG
7.5
RPG
1.4
APG
0.5
SPG
0.5
BPG
57.1
FG%
32.4
3P%
78.6
FT%
26.5
MPG

GAME LOG

74 games played