SAC

2025-26 Season

MALIK MONK

Sacramento Kings | Guard | 6-3
Malik Monk
12.5 PPG
1.9 RPG
3.0 APG
22.0 MPG
-2.3 Impact

Monk produces at an below average rate for a 22-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-2.3
Scoring +11.3
Points 12.5 PPG = +8.3
Shot Making above expected FG% = +3.0
Creation +0.8
Creation 3.0 AST/g = +0.8
Turnovers -3.4
Turnovers 1.5/g = -3.4
Defense -0.3
Defense 0.6 STL, 0.4 BLK = -0.3
Hustle & Effort +1.0
Rebounds 1.9 RPG = +1.0
Raw Impact +9.4
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.7
Net Impact
-2.3
47th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 245 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 66th
12.6 PPG
Efficiency 44th
54.1% TS
Playmaking 57th
3.0 APG
Rebounding 16th
1.9 RPG
Defense 22th
+5.1/g
Hustle 8th
+4.1/g
Creation 43th
+2.54/g
Shot Making 72th
+7.98/g
TO Discipline 32th
0.07/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Malik Monk's opening stretch was defined by a maddening inconsistency that swung entirely on his shot selection. When his jumper fell, he was an absolute flamethrower. On 10/24 vs UTA, Monk completely flipped the game's momentum with a barrage of deep threes, racking up 20 points and a massive +11.5 impact score. However, his tendency to force the issue often punished his own team. Look at 11/26 vs PHX, where he poured in 15 points but still posted a -6.6 impact score because he bled value defensively while chasing buckets. His erratic decision-making hit rock bottom on 11/09 vs MIN, yielding just 2 points and a staggering -13.8 impact score as wild, contested jumpers killed the second unit's rhythm. He remains a highly potent scoring punch, but his refusal to attack the paint when his perimeter touch vanishes makes him a dangerously volatile rotation piece.

Malik Monk's midseason stretch was a wildly erratic rollercoaster where brilliant scoring explosions were constantly undermined by disastrous shot selection. He looked like the league's most lethal sixth man on 01/18 vs POR, pouring in 23 points and posting a +12.9 impact score because his perimeter shot-making completely broke the opposing defensive shell. Yet, high scoring totals often masked deeper flaws in his overall floor game. During his 18-point outing on 01/20 vs MIA, Monk registered a -5.5 impact because his decision-making devolved into heavy contested pull-ups. Even when the shots fell flawlessly on 01/21 vs TOR, his 17 points on 6-for-7 shooting still yielded a -2.9 impact score due to a glaring inability to navigate defensive screens on the other end of the floor. When the jumper abandoned him entirely, things got truly ugly; a scoreless, nine-minute stint on 12/08 vs IND resulted in a brutal -11.8 impact score driven entirely by forced, out-of-rhythm jumpers early in the shot clock. This maddening inconsistency turned him into a volatile wildcard who could shoot his team into a game just as quickly as he could shoot them out of it.

This stretch was defined by a maddening volatility where Malik Monk's erratic shot selection frequently sabotaged his own team. Even when the ball went through the hoop, hidden costs dragged him down. During the Mar 05 vs NOP matchup, he tallied 18 points but posted a dismal -6.7 impact score because a barrage of ill-advised three-point attempts and uninspired defense actively hurt the lineup. A brief promotion to the starting unit yielded similarly frustrating results. On Mar 24 vs CHA, he dished out an impressive 14 assists, yet still recorded a -3.7 impact because he repeatedly forced terrible looks during a disastrous 3-for-13 shooting night. Ironically, he occasionally helped the team more when he barely scored at all. Look at his brief stint on Mar 10 vs IND, where a meager 4-point outing still generated a +0.7 impact thanks to high-energy loose ball recoveries and active hands on defense. Ultimately, Monk operated as a chaotic spark plug who shot his team out of games just as often as he ignited them.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Monk's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~7 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 53% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive impact is minimal for a 22-minute player. Not generating enough contests, rim protection, or forced turnovers to move the needle.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 3 games. Longest cold streak: 7 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 66 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

A. Mitchell 41.2 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 7
J. Clark 38.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. LaRavia 37.8 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 44.4%
PPP 0.32
PTS 12
T. Hardaway Jr. 37.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Brown 37.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 9
J. Suggs 35.6 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 5
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 8
D. DiVincenzo 35.4 poss
FG% 22.2%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 7
A. Thompson 35.2 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 8
M. Smart 28.2 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.53
PTS 15

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

T. Hardaway Jr. 46.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 5
D. DiVincenzo 45.3 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 10
A. Holiday 42.0 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 3
A. Mitchell 39.3 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 5
J. LaRavia 36.3 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 9
G. Vincent 36.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Brown 36.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
S. Fontecchio 33.8 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.24
PTS 8
J. Clark 30.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Suggs 28.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 3

SEASON STATS

62
Games
12.5
PPG
1.9
RPG
3.0
APG
0.6
SPG
0.4
BPG
43.8
FG%
39.5
3P%
87.9
FT%
22.0
MPG

GAME LOG

62 games played