DEN

2025-26 Season

JULIAN STRAWTHER

Denver Nuggets | Guard | 6-6
Julian Strawther
7.2 PPG
2.0 RPG
1.1 APG
15.1 MPG
-4.6 Impact

Strawther produces at an below average rate for a 15-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-4.6
Scoring +6.7
Points 7.2 PPG = +5.0
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.7
Creation +0.5
Creation 1.1 AST/g = +0.5
Turnovers -1.6
Turnovers 0.6/g = -1.6
Defense -0.2
Defense 0.4 STL, 0.1 BLK = -0.2
Hustle & Effort +1.1
Rebounds 2.0 RPG = +1.1
Raw Impact +6.5
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.1
Net Impact
-4.6
28th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 245 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 37th
8.0 PPG
Efficiency 33th
52.4% TS
Playmaking 13th
1.2 APG
Rebounding 23th
2.2 RPG
Defense 20th
+4.9/g
Hustle 62th
+10.2/g
Creation 39th
+2.45/g
Shot Making 37th
+5.68/g
TO Discipline 73th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

A brutal, extended shooting slump and defensive apathy defined Julian Strawther's early season as he struggled to justify his rotation spot. Even when his offensive game clicked during a 12-point outing on 11/08 vs IND, his overall value plummeted to a -7.6 impact score because the hidden costs of poor defense and blown assignments entirely erased his scoring. The wheels completely fell off weeks later on 12/22 vs UTA. During that dismal stint, a broken jumper resulted in a 0-for-6 shooting night and a disastrous -10.1 impact mark that severely tanked his on-court value. He simply cannot stay on the floor playing like this. A rare bright spot finally arrived on 12/23 vs DAL, where he tallied eight points and generated a +3.8 impact score by combining confident perimeter strokes with active hustle plays. Unless he commits to stopping the ball and making better decisions early in the shot clock, these empty rotational stints will continue to bleed points.

Julian Strawther’s midseason stretch was defined by a jarring split personality, oscillating wildly between gritty defensive contributions and empty-calorie scoring binges. During the 01/30 vs LAC matchup, Strawther managed just 3 points but still posted a stellar +7.8 impact because he shifted his focus entirely toward defensive execution. Yet, when the jumper started falling, his intensity on the other end frequently vanished. Look no further than the 02/03 vs DET game. Despite an efficient 15-point outing, he dragged the second unit down with a disastrous -9.1 impact score driven by a staggering -14.5 defensive rating. He repeated this frustrating pattern during the 02/09 vs CLE contest, dropping 20 points but suffering a -6.8 impact as his scoring surge masked underlying defensive lapses. If Strawther wants to remain a reliable fixture in the starting lineup, he must stop treating defensive effort as an optional tax on his offensive touches.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Strawther has posted negative impact in 77% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 67% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -5.9, second-half: -3.3. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 2 games. Longest cold streak: 15 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 63 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

A. Simons 23.2 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.47
PTS 11
G. Harris 23.0 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 9
A. Reaves 20.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. Wallace 19.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Wells 18.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 4
D. Mitchell 18.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 1
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 3
K. Dunn 16.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Miller 16.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. DiVincenzo 15.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 2

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

T. Camara 29.1 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.17
PTS 5
K. Ellis 26.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 5
A. Reaves 21.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2
C. Wallace 20.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
G. Harris 20.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 3
J. Wells 18.9 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.58
PTS 11
S. Mykhailiuk 18.6 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 5
J. Ivey 17.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
L. Shamet 17.1 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.47
PTS 8
D. Jones Jr. 17.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

57
Games
7.2
PPG
2.0
RPG
1.1
APG
0.4
SPG
0.1
BPG
46.7
FG%
38.7
3P%
81.4
FT%
15.1
MPG

GAME LOG

57 games played