ORL

2025-26 Season

JASE RICHARDSON

Orlando Magic | Guard | 6-1
Jase Richardson
4.4 PPG
1.2 RPG
1.1 APG
10.8 MPG
-5.3 Impact

Richardson produces at an poor rate for a 11-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-5.3
Scoring +4.0
Points 4.4 PPG = +3.0
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.0
Creation +0.3
Creation 1.1 AST/g = +0.3
Turnovers -1.1
Turnovers 0.5/g = -1.1
Defense -0.1
Defense 0.3 STL, 0.0 BLK = -0.1
Hustle & Effort +1.0
Rebounds 1.2 RPG = +1.0
Raw Impact +4.1
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.4
Net Impact
-5.3
22th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 245 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 16th
5.7 PPG
Efficiency 53th
55.3% TS
Playmaking 16th
1.3 APG
Rebounding 8th
1.5 RPG
Defense 30th
+5.5/g
Hustle 23th
+6.3/g
Creation 9th
+1.33/g
Shot Making 30th
+5.13/g
TO Discipline 74th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Jase Richardson’s first twenty games defined the agonizing volatility of a fringe rotation player desperately hunting for a permanent role. Early in the season, he routinely vanished into the background with empty, passive minutes. Then came a sudden eruption on 11/23 vs BOS, where he poured in 18 points and generated a +7.0 impact score through brilliant shot selection. He provided a similar explosive spark on 12/07 vs NYK, driving a massive +7.3 impact spike in just six minutes of action despite scoring only 8 points. That momentum was incredibly short-lived. During a 23-minute run on 12/20 vs UTA, Richardson managed 10 points but posted a disastrous -7.2 impact score. His unexpected scoring bump was entirely negated by severe point-of-attack defensive lapses that killed the team's momentum on the other end of the floor. Until he learns to anchor his game with consistent defensive discipline, his nightly value will remain a total coin flip.

This brutal twenty-game stretch was defined by erratic swings between fleeting offensive flashes and catastrophic defensive lapses that rendered Richardson a massive liability. He actually found a scoring rhythm on 01/04 vs IND with 12 points and 4 assists, yet still posted a miserable -6.6 impact score because opposing ball-handlers completely shredded his defensive coverages. He briefly flipped the script two nights later on 01/06 vs WAS. Riding an unexpected explosion of perimeter shot-making, he poured in 20 points and generated a +3.0 impact rating. Sadly, that momentum quickly evaporated into a string of unplayable performances, bottoming out on 01/22 vs CHA. During that contest, poor shot selection and a total lack of playmaking severely handicapped the offense, dragging him down to a disastrous -12.2 impact score with just 2 points in 23 minutes. Even when his on-ball defensive effort stabilized later in the winter, his utter inability to generate gravity or hit open looks kept his overall value firmly in the red.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Richardson has posted negative impact in 82% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 65% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Small downward trend. First-half impact: -4.1, second-half: -6.5. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 2 games. Longest cold streak: 15 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 74 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

T. McConnell 44.1 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 6
I. Collier 20.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Carrington 19.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 3
W. Riley 17.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.4
PTS 7
N. Traore 17.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. George 16.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Strawther 16.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. Love 15.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 2
T. Mann 15.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 2
C. Sexton 15.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 3

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

T. McConnell 36.9 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 8
I. Collier 26.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 7
J. Pickett 19.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Champagnie 19.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 6
N. Traore 18.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2
C. Porter Jr. 18.3 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 4
B. Brown 18.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Green 16.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. Love 16.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
S. James 16.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

55
Games
4.4
PPG
1.2
RPG
1.1
APG
0.3
SPG
0.0
BPG
47.4
FG%
35.0
3P%
71.7
FT%
10.8
MPG

GAME LOG

55 games played