Orlando Magic

Eastern Conference

Orlando
Magic

HC Jamahl Mosley

47-38
W2

ROSTER — IMPACT RANKINGS

Desmond Bane
Guard Yr 5 85G (85S)
+10.8
20.1 pts
4.2 reb
4.1 ast
33.7 min

Desmond Bane evolved into a ruthless, multi-dimensional engine during the final third of the season, blending scorching perimeter shooting with gritty peripheral contributions. He reached his absolute ceiling in the 03/11 vs CLE matchup, erupting for 35 points, six rebounds, and six assists on blistering 12-for-19 shooting to post a staggering +31.0 Impact score. That massive number stemmed directly from his pristine shot selection and relentless playmaking, which completely dismantled Cleveland's defensive coverages. Even when his jumper abandoned him, he still found ways to tilt the floor. During the 04/17 vs CHA game, he clanked his way to 4-for-14 from the field for just 13 points, yet still managed a +8.0 Impact score because he crashed the glass for seven critical rebounds and generated extra possessions through sheer hustle. He wasn't entirely immune to flat performances, though. On 04/10 vs CHI, a total lack of aggression and rhythm rendered him virtually invisible, resulting in just two points on four shots and a dismal -7.0 Impact score.

Paolo Banchero
Forward Yr 3 75G (75S)
+10.8
22.2 pts
8.3 reb
5.2 ast
34.8 min

Banchero spent the final months of the season oscillating between unstoppable offensive juggernaut and erratic volume shooter. When his jumper fell, he was utterly terrifying, as seen on 03/08 vs MIL when he torched the defense for 33 points on blistering 12-of-16 shooting to earn a massive +25.8 Impact score. Yet even when his shot abandoned him, he frequently found ways to tilt the floor. During a rough 4-for-14 shooting night on 03/21 vs LAL, he still managed a +7.2 Impact score by leaning into his playmaking with six assists and grinding out defensive stops. The hustle couldn't save him on 03/29 vs TOR, however. Forcing bad looks and bricking all five of his three-point attempts, he scraped together just nine points, resulting in a brutal -13.9 Impact score as his inefficient chucking dragged the team down. He remains a brilliant focal point, but dialing back the forced shots on cold nights is his next necessary hurdle.

Franz Wagner
Forward Yr 4 37G (35S)
+10.8
20.2 pts
5.2 reb
3.4 ast
29.9 min

Franz Wagner's mid-season stretch was defined by a brief, turbulent demotion to the second unit before exploding into an incredibly efficient late-season rhythm as a starter. The nadir of this period hit on 02/11 vs MIL, where a brutal shooting night off the bench yielded a dismal -6.4 impact score. He managed just five points on 1-for-7 shooting and grabbed zero rebounds, actively hurting the team with empty, fruitless possessions. Once reinserted into the starting lineup permanently in April, Wagner caught fire. He peaked on 04/10 vs CHI, pouring in 25 points on a blistering 8-for-13 shooting clip and generating a massive +11.9 impact by punishing defensive rotations. He closed the stretch with an equally impressive +11.6 impact mark on 04/17 vs CHA. Despite a modest 18 points, Wagner created immense value through unselfish playmaking and board control, racking up seven rebounds and six assists to dominate the game without forcing his own offense.

Wendell Carter Jr.
Center-Forward Yr 7 81G (81S)
+5.4
11.9 pts
7.4 reb
2.0 ast
29.4 min

This late-season stretch was defined by Wendell Carter Jr.'s ruthless interior efficiency and relentless glass-cleaning, anchoring the frontcourt with blue-collar consistency rather than flashy volume. He set the tone immediately on 02/24 vs LAL, racking up 20 points and 11 rebounds on 9-of-13 shooting to generate a massive +18.9 Impact score. That stellar rating stemmed directly from his pristine shot selection and physical rebounding, punishing defenders in the paint without forcing bad looks. Even when his touch completely abandoned him, he still found ways to win his minutes. During the 04/15 vs PHI matchup, Carter scored just five points on a miserable 1-of-7 from the floor, yet still posted a +5.6 Impact score because he swallowed up 11 rebounds and created crucial extra possessions through pure hustle. However, his offensive limitations occasionally crippled the rotation, peaking during a brutal outing on 04/12 vs BOS. Going 0-of-5 from the field for just three points dragged him down to a glaring -10.0 Impact score, highlighting how quickly his overall value plummets when he fails to convert easy looks around the rim.

Anthony Black
Guard Yr 2 67G (40S)
+3.3
14.7 pts
3.9 reb
3.7 ast
29.6 min

Anthony Black’s midseason stretch was a tale of two entirely different realities, morphing from an aggressive, high-minute starter into an erratic bench piece. He initially offset his perimeter shooting struggles with relentless energy. He generated a solid +3.4 Impact on 01/27 vs CLE despite a quiet 14 points on a brutal 2-of-9 from deep, creating value through sheer defensive hustle and effort. The very next night, his offensive game fully clicked. During 01/28 vs MIA, Black poured in 26 points on crisp 11-of-19 shooting to post a massive +31.4 Impact. However, his rhythm completely collapsed by late February as poor shot selection plagued his game. In an ugly 02/26 vs HOU tilt, he forced terrible looks to finish with just eight points and a dismal -11.4 Impact on 3-of-12 shooting. After missing a month of action, he returned exclusively as a reserve, struggling to replicate his early-season magic without the ball in his hands.

Jalen Suggs
Guard Yr 4 60G (59S)
+2.5
13.6 pts
3.9 reb
5.4 ast
27.8 min

Jalen Suggs's late-season stretch was a volatile rollercoaster defined by erratic shooting nights and brilliant flashes of floor generalship. He was an absolute offensive engine during the 03/12 vs WAS matchup, erupting for 28 points and eight assists on crisp 10-for-17 shooting to post a massive +21.2 impact score. Even when his scoring volume dipped, he found ways to dictate the game through elite distribution. On 04/06 vs DET, Suggs attempted just nine shots for 12 points, yet his precise passing yielded 12 assists and drove a stellar +15.2 impact. Unfortunately, his shot selection frequently betrayed his overall value. Look at the 04/05 vs NOP contest, where he forced up an abysmal 4-for-19 from the floor. Those wasted offensive possessions dragged his impact down to -3.0, completely erasing the value of his playmaking and defensive effort.

Tristan da Silva
Forward Yr 1 80G (34S)
+0.6
9.7 pts
3.7 reb
1.6 ast
24.4 min

This stretch was a brutal reality check, beginning as a scorching offensive breakout before collapsing into a late-season slump that cost da Silva his starting job. He looked untouchable on 03/05 vs DAL, coming off the bench to drain all seven of his shots for 19 points and a staggering +21.9 Impact score. He did not even need a hot hand to dominate that week. On 03/07 vs MIN, da Silva managed just 11 points but still commanded a +14.3 Impact score by relentlessly crashing the glass for seven rebounds and suffocating his matchups on the perimeter. But that two-way fire completely vanished by April. Look no further than 04/06 vs DET, where he tallied a respectable 12 points but crippled the lineup with a dismal -8.9 Impact score because his empty scoring volume came at the cost of stagnant ball movement and dreadful overall efficiency. By the final week, his erratic decision-making forced the coaching staff to slash his minutes to the mid-teens, revealing a young wing who still lacks the nightly discipline to anchor a rotation.

Goga Bitadze
Center-Forward Yr 6 67G (3S)
-0.5
5.8 pts
5.0 reb
1.3 ast
15.1 min

Goga Bitadze’s late-season run was defined by weeks of profound irrelevance abruptly shattered by a massive, out-of-nowhere rebounding eruption. For much of March, the big man was a distinct negative whenever he stepped on the floor, bottoming out completely on 03/12 vs WAS. Despite playing just four minutes in that contest, he posted an abysmal -11.2 Impact score because he bricked both of his shots and generated absolutely nothing of value during a completely empty stint. Then, everything changed. Bitadze flipped the script entirely on 04/08 vs MIN, bullying his way to 14 points, 15 rebounds, and six assists in just 22 minutes. That relentless glass-cleaning and interior hustle earned him a staggering +18.6 Impact score. He even found ways to be highly effective without heavy volume late in the year, like on 04/17 vs CHA. Though he scored just seven points in that matchup, his flawless shooting and active defensive rotations drove a robust +4.5 Impact score to close out the stretch.

Moritz Wagner
Forward-Center Yr 7 37G
-3.3
6.7 pts
3.2 reb
0.7 ast
11.7 min

Moritz Wagner spent the late stages of the 2025-26 season battling a severe offensive slump that rapidly eroded his spot in the rotation. During the 03/17 vs OKC matchup, he hoisted up a dismal 1-for-6 shooting line in 13 minutes. That erratic shot selection actively killed offensive momentum, resulting in a brutal -10.0 impact score. The coaching staff tried offering him a longer leash during the 03/19 vs CHA contest, but he squandered his season-high 19 minutes with another dreadful 1-for-5 shooting performance and a -7.3 impact mark. By the time he logged a scoreless, five-minute cardio session in the 03/26 vs SAC game, his impact had plummeted to a staggering -11.5. When a reserve big man cannot convert around the rim or secure more than a single rebound, his minutes become a heavy tax on the second unit. Wagner simply failed to generate any meaningful offensive gravity during this bleak stretch, turning his brief appearances into glaring liabilities.

Jevon Carter
Guard Yr 7 31G (1S)
-3.4
6.9 pts
2.0 reb
2.2 ast
19.9 min

Jevon Carter's late-season stretch was defined by erratic offensive production that routinely sabotaged his team's momentum. When handed a rare starting nod on 03/23 vs IND, he completely flatlined. He managed just two points on 1-for-5 shooting across 24 minutes, resulting in a dismal -13.3 Impact score as his inability to space the floor bogged down the half-court offense. The bottom fell out entirely on 03/31 vs PHX. Chucking up five missed threes and finishing scoreless, Carter posted a brutal -14.1 Impact score because his rushed shot selection actively fueled opponent transition runs. He occasionally found his rhythm off the bench, notably serving as a flawless spark plug during the 04/08 vs MIN matchup. By hitting all four of his shots—including three triples—he generated a +5.1 Impact score, reminding everyone that his current NBA value hinges entirely on whether his perimeter jumper is actually falling.

Jamal Cain
Forward Yr 3 43G (1S)
-4.0
5.4 pts
1.9 reb
0.7 ast
12.1 min

Jamal Cain’s late-season stretch was defined by extreme whiplash, bouncing wildly between hyper-efficient scoring bursts and completely invisible duds. The absolute bottom fell out on 03/29 vs TOR, where a brutal 0-for-3 shooting night and a total lack of playmaking in just eight minutes resulted in a catastrophic -25.7 impact score. He completely flipped the script shortly after on 03/31 vs PHX. Despite scoring a modest 12 points, his mistake-free shot selection and flawless 2-for-2 mark from deep generated a massive +13.9 impact score. Cain reached his absolute peak on 04/10 vs CHI. He torched the nets for 20 points on 9-of-11 shooting, grabbing eight rebounds and posting a team-lifting +18.5 impact score simply by taking high-percentage looks and attacking the glass. When he plays within the flow of the offense, he looks like a legitimate rotation piece, but his tendency to vanish on cold nights makes him a frustrating gamble.

Jett Howard
Guard Yr 2 56G
-5.0
5.4 pts
1.6 reb
0.8 ast
12.5 min

Jett Howard spent the late winter of the 2025-26 season tumbling out of the rotation, plagued by a brutal slump where his defensive lapses entirely erased his occasional shooting bursts. The warning signs flashed immediately on 03/01 vs DET, as a scoreless, disjointed 13-minute run resulted in an abysmal -12.7 Impact score. He simply could not stay in front of his assignments, making him a massive liability whenever his jumper went cold. Even when the shots fell, the hidden costs of his floor time were glaringly obvious. During the 03/23 vs IND matchup, Howard scored a highly efficient 10 points on 4-for-5 shooting, yet still posted a -3.8 Impact score because his zero assists and porous perimeter defense bled points on the other end. He managed a rare bright spot on 03/31 vs PHX, generating a +3.0 Impact score by pouring in 12 points in just 14 minutes to outscore his own defensive mistakes. Ultimately, relying strictly on volatile scoring while offering virtually zero rebounding or resistance relegated Howard to the deep end of the bench.

Jase Richardson
Guard Yr 0 55G
-5.3
4.4 pts
1.2 reb
1.1 ast
10.8 min

Jase Richardson spent the back half of the 2025-26 season marooned at the very end of the bench, struggling to find any rhythm during sporadic, low-minute cameos. His absolute nadir arrived on 03/03 vs WAS, where he logged zero points on 0-for-3 shooting across 13 minutes. This empty cardio session resulted in a brutal -14.8 Impact score, driven entirely by his inability to create offensive gravity or disrupt passing lanes. Even when he actually found the bottom of the net, hidden costs often negated his production. During a longer 18-minute leash on 03/23 vs IND, Richardson tallied nine points on crisp 4-for-5 shooting, yet still posted a -0.5 Impact score because he consistently bled points on the defensive end. He finally offered a fleeting glimpse of utility on 04/10 vs CHI, exploding for eight points in just six minutes. He earned a +5.9 Impact score in that brief window by simply attacking the basket and playing decisively instead of hesitating. Unfortunately, those aggressive flashes were far too rare to pull him out of the rotation's basement.

Jonathan Isaac
Forward Yr 8 52G
-6.0
2.6 pts
2.5 reb
0.4 ast
10.0 min

This grueling stretch of the season was defined by a rapid decay in Jonathan Isaac's role, reducing the veteran to an offensive ghost glued to the end of the bench. He offered a fleeting glimpse of his ceiling on 02/01 vs SAS. By actually hunting his shot and scoring 9 points on 4-of-6 shooting, he generated a +5.7 Impact score in 15 minutes of action. Unfortunately, that aggressive flash was an extreme outlier. Just two days prior on 01/30 vs TOR, he managed a dismal -13.1 Impact score; his quiet 4 points and zero assists completely stalled the second unit's offensive rhythm. Even when he hit the glass hard, like pulling down 7 rebounds on 02/19 vs SAC, his inability to score a single point kept his Impact score in the red at -3.9. You simply cannot survive in a modern NBA rotation when your scoring gravity is entirely nonexistent.

Noah Penda
Guard-Forward Yr 0 60G (2S)
-6.1
3.9 pts
3.1 reb
1.2 ast
12.7 min

This stretch was defined by a rapid erosion of trust and playing time, reducing Noah Penda from a fringe rotation piece to an end-of-bench afterthought. He briefly offered a glimpse of utility during the 03/08 vs MIL matchup, logging 8 points, 7 rebounds, and 4 assists to generate a rare +7.3 impact score. That positive mark stemmed from his willingness to crash the glass and keep the ball moving, creating tangible value even without high-volume scoring. However, that brief spark quickly faded into a brutal slump characterized by passive offense and empty minutes. Look no further than the 03/12 vs WAS contest. He posted a dismal -13.0 impact score in 14 minutes, largely because his complete refusal to attempt a single field goal crippled the team's spacing and offensive flow. The bottom completely fell out during the 03/24 vs CLE game, where he registered a staggering -19.9 impact score in just 5 minutes by providing absolutely zero scoring or rebounding resistance. By April, his inability to threaten defenses rendered him practically unplayable.

Colin Castleton
Center Yr 2 4G
-7.3
1.2 pts
2.0 reb
0.2 ast
5.3 min
Orlando Robinson
Center Yr 3 4G (1S)
-7.6
1.8 pts
1.0 reb
0.8 ast
6.2 min
Tyus Jones
Guard Yr 10 48G (8S)
-7.7
3.0 pts
1.1 reb
2.4 ast
15.7 min

Tyus Jones spent this late-season stretch tumbling into irrelevance. He battled a brutal slump that banished him to the deep bench. Just look at his outing on 03/05 vs LAL, where he posted a dreadful -15.6 impact score while failing to score or register a single assist in six ghost-like minutes. His abysmal metrics throughout this period stemmed from extreme passivity, rushed shot selection, and a total inability to organize the offense. He found a rare spark when thrust into the starting lineup on 02/20 vs MIN, logging 13 points and six assists to scrape together a +0.3 impact score. During an April start on 04/10 vs OKC, Jones hit all three of his attempts from deep to finish with nine points, but still posted a miserable -7.9 impact. That negative mark reveals the hidden costs of his floor time: opposing guards relentlessly hunted his lack of size on defense, entirely erasing the value of his perimeter shooting.

Alex Morales
Guard Yr 0 4G
-10.2
2.0 pts
0.8 reb
1.0 ast
5.9 min
W
@ DET DET
112 ORL DET 101
DET @ DET
112 101
Sun, Apr 19
Playoffs Analysis
+11
W
vs CHA CHA
90 CHA ORL 121
CHA vs CHA
121 90
Fri, Apr 17
Play-In Analysis
+31
L
@ PHI PHI
97 ORL PHI 109
PHI @ PHI
97 109
Wed, Apr 15
Play-In Analysis
-12
L
@ BOS BOS
108 ORL BOS 113
BOS @ BOS
108 113
Sun, Apr 12
Analysis
-5
W
@ CHI CHI
127 ORL CHI 103
CHI @ CHI
127 103
Fri, Apr 10
Analysis
+24
W
vs MIN MIN
120 MIN ORL 132
MIN vs MIN
132 120
Wed, Apr 8
Analysis
+12
W
vs DET DET
107 DET ORL 123
DET vs DET
123 107
Mon, Apr 6
Analysis
+16
W
@ NOP NOP
112 ORL NOP 108
NOP @ NOP
112 108
Sun, Apr 5
Analysis
+4
W
@ DAL DAL
138 ORL DAL 127
DAL @ DAL
138 127
Fri, Apr 3
Analysis
+11
L
vs ATL ATL
130 ATL ORL 101
ATL vs ATL
101 130
Wed, Apr 1
Analysis
-29
W
vs PHX PHX
111 PHX ORL 115
PHX vs PHX
115 111
Tue, Mar 31
Analysis
+4
L
@ TOR TOR
87 ORL TOR 139
TOR @ TOR
87 139
Sun, Mar 29
Analysis
-52
W
vs SAC SAC
117 SAC ORL 121
SAC vs SAC
121 117
Thu, Mar 26
Analysis
+4
L
@ CLE CLE
131 ORL CLE 136
CLE @ CLE
131 136
Tue, Mar 24
Analysis
-5
L
vs IND IND
128 IND ORL 126
IND vs IND
126 128
Mon, Mar 23
Analysis
-2
L
vs LAL LAL
105 LAL ORL 104
LAL vs LAL
104 105
Sat, Mar 21
Analysis
-1
L
@ CHA CHA
111 ORL CHA 130
CHA @ CHA
111 130
Thu, Mar 19
Analysis
-19
L
vs OKC OKC
113 OKC ORL 108
OKC vs OKC
108 113
Tue, Mar 17
Analysis
-5
L
@ ATL ATL
112 ORL ATL 124
ATL @ ATL
112 124
Mon, Mar 16
Analysis
-12
W
@ MIA MIA
121 ORL MIA 117
MIA @ MIA
121 117
Sat, Mar 14
Analysis
+4
W
vs WAS WAS
131 WAS ORL 136
WAS vs WAS
136 131
Thu, Mar 12
Analysis
+5
W
vs CLE CLE
122 CLE ORL 128
CLE vs CLE
128 122
Wed, Mar 11
Analysis
+6
W
@ MIL MIL
130 ORL MIL 91
MIL @ MIL
130 91
Sun, Mar 8
Analysis
+39
W
@ MIN MIN
119 ORL MIN 92
MIN @ MIN
119 92
Sat, Mar 7
Analysis
+27
W
vs DAL DAL
114 DAL ORL 115
DAL vs DAL
115 114
Thu, Mar 5
Analysis
+1
W
vs WAS WAS
109 WAS ORL 126
WAS vs WAS
126 109
Tue, Mar 3
Analysis
+17
L
vs DET DET
106 DET ORL 92
DET vs DET
92 106
Sun, Mar 1
Analysis
-14
L
vs HOU HOU
113 HOU ORL 108
HOU vs HOU
108 113
Thu, Feb 26
Analysis
-5
W
@ LAL LAL
110 ORL LAL 109
LAL @ LAL
110 109
Tue, Feb 24
Analysis
+1
W
@ LAC LAC
111 ORL LAC 109
LAC @ LAC
111 109
Sun, Feb 22
Analysis
+2
L
@ PHX PHX
110 ORL PHX 113
PHX @ PHX
110 113
Sat, Feb 21
Analysis
-3
W
@ SAC SAC
131 ORL SAC 94
SAC @ SAC
131 94
Thu, Feb 19
Analysis
+37
L
vs MIL MIL
116 MIL ORL 108
MIL vs MIL
108 116
Wed, Feb 11
Analysis
-8
W
vs MIL MIL
99 MIL ORL 118
MIL vs MIL
118 99
Mon, Feb 9
Analysis
+19
W
vs UTA UTA
117 UTA ORL 120
UTA vs UTA
120 117
Sat, Feb 7
Analysis
+3
W
vs BKN BKN
98 BKN ORL 118
BKN vs BKN
118 98
Thu, Feb 5
Analysis
+20
L
@ OKC OKC
92 ORL OKC 128
OKC @ OKC
92 128
Tue, Feb 3
Analysis
-36
L
@ SAS SAS
103 ORL SAS 112
SAS @ SAS
103 112
Sun, Feb 1
Analysis
-9
W
vs TOR TOR
120 TOR ORL 130
TOR vs TOR
130 120
Fri, Jan 30
Analysis
+10
W
@ MIA MIA
133 ORL MIA 124
MIA @ MIA
133 124
Wed, Jan 28
Analysis
+9
L
@ CLE CLE
98 ORL CLE 114
CLE @ CLE
98 114
Tue, Jan 27
Analysis
-16
L
vs CLE CLE
119 CLE ORL 105
CLE vs CLE
105 119
Sun, Jan 25
Analysis
-14
L
vs CHA CHA
124 CHA ORL 97
CHA vs CHA
97 124
Fri, Jan 23
Analysis
-27
L
@ MEM MEM
109 ORL MEM 126
MEM @ MEM
109 126
Sun, Jan 18
Analysis
-17
W
vs MEM MEM
111 MEM ORL 118
MEM vs MEM
118 111
Thu, Jan 15
Analysis
+7
W
vs NOP NOP
118 NOP ORL 128
NOP vs NOP
128 118
Sun, Jan 11
Analysis
+10
L
vs PHI PHI
103 PHI ORL 91
PHI vs PHI
91 103
Sat, Jan 10
Analysis
-12
W
@ BKN BKN
104 ORL BKN 103
BKN @ BKN
104 103
Thu, Jan 8
Analysis
+1
L
@ WAS WAS
112 ORL WAS 120
WAS @ WAS
112 120
Wed, Jan 7
Analysis
-8
W
vs IND IND
127 IND ORL 135
IND vs IND
135 127
Sun, Jan 4
Analysis
+8
L
@ CHI CHI
114 ORL CHI 121
CHI @ CHI
114 121
Sat, Jan 3
Analysis
-7
W
@ IND IND
112 ORL IND 110
IND @ IND
112 110
Wed, Dec 31
Analysis
+2
L
@ TOR TOR
106 ORL TOR 107
TOR @ TOR
106 107
Tue, Dec 30
Analysis
-1
W
vs DEN DEN
126 DEN ORL 127
DEN vs DEN
127 126
Sun, Dec 28
Analysis
+1
L
vs CHA CHA
120 CHA ORL 105
CHA vs CHA
105 120
Sat, Dec 27
Analysis
-15
W
@ POR POR
110 ORL POR 106
POR @ POR
110 106
Wed, Dec 24
Analysis
+4
L
@ GSW GSW
97 ORL GSW 120
GSW @ GSW
97 120
Tue, Dec 23
Analysis
-23
W
@ UTA UTA
128 ORL UTA 127
UTA @ UTA
128 127
Sun, Dec 21
Analysis
+1
L
@ DEN DEN
115 ORL DEN 126
DEN @ DEN
115 126
Fri, Dec 19
Analysis
-11
L
vs NYK NYK
132 NYK ORL 120
NYK vs NYK
120 132
Sat, Dec 13
Analysis
-12
W
vs MIA MIA
108 MIA ORL 117
MIA vs MIA
117 108
Tue, Dec 9
Analysis
+9
L
@ NYK NYK
100 ORL NYK 106
NYK @ NYK
100 106
Sun, Dec 7
Analysis
-6
W
vs MIA MIA
105 MIA ORL 106
MIA vs MIA
106 105
Sat, Dec 6
Analysis
+1
L
vs SAS SAS
114 SAS ORL 112
SAS vs SAS
112 114
Thu, Dec 4
Analysis
-2
W
vs CHI CHI
120 CHI ORL 125
CHI vs CHI
125 120
Tue, Dec 2
Analysis
+5
W
@ DET DET
112 ORL DET 109
DET @ DET
112 109
Sat, Nov 29
Analysis
+3
W
@ PHI PHI
144 ORL PHI 103
PHI @ PHI
144 103
Wed, Nov 26
Analysis
+41
L
@ BOS BOS
129 ORL BOS 138
BOS @ BOS
129 138
Sun, Nov 23
Analysis
-9
W
vs NYK NYK
121 NYK ORL 133
NYK vs NYK
133 121
Sat, Nov 22
Analysis
+12
W
vs LAC LAC
101 LAC ORL 129
LAC vs LAC
129 101
Fri, Nov 21
Analysis
+28
W
vs GSW GSW
113 GSW ORL 121
GSW vs GSW
121 113
Wed, Nov 19
Analysis
+8
L
@ HOU HOU
113 ORL HOU 117
HOU @ HOU
113 117
Mon, Nov 17
Analysis
-4
W
vs BKN BKN
98 BKN ORL 105
BKN vs BKN
105 98
Sat, Nov 15
Analysis
+7
W
@ NYK NYK
124 ORL NYK 107
NYK @ NYK
124 107
Thu, Nov 13
Analysis
+17
W
vs POR POR
112 POR ORL 115
POR vs POR
115 112
Tue, Nov 11
Analysis
+3
L
vs BOS BOS
111 BOS ORL 107
BOS vs BOS
107 111
Sun, Nov 9
Analysis
-4
W
vs BOS BOS
110 BOS ORL 123
BOS vs BOS
123 110
Sat, Nov 8
Analysis
+13
L
@ ATL ATL
112 ORL ATL 127
ATL @ ATL
112 127
Wed, Nov 5
Analysis
-15
W
@ WAS WAS
125 ORL WAS 94
WAS @ WAS
125 94
Sat, Nov 1
Analysis
+31
W
@ CHA CHA
123 ORL CHA 107
CHA @ CHA
123 107
Thu, Oct 30
Analysis
+16
L
@ DET DET
116 ORL DET 135
DET @ DET
116 135
Wed, Oct 29
Analysis
-19
L
@ PHI PHI
124 ORL PHI 136
PHI @ PHI
124 136
Mon, Oct 27
Analysis
-12
L
vs CHI CHI
110 CHI ORL 98
CHI vs CHI
98 110
Sat, Oct 25
Analysis
-12
L
vs ATL ATL
111 ATL ORL 107
ATL vs ATL
107 111
Fri, Oct 24
Analysis
-4
W
vs MIA MIA
121 MIA ORL 125
MIA vs MIA
125 121
Wed, Oct 22
Analysis
+4