ORL

2025-26 Season

JAMAL CAIN

Orlando Magic | Forward | 6-7
Jamal Cain
5.5 PPG
1.9 RPG
0.7 APG
12.2 MPG
-3.7 Impact

Cain produces at an below average rate for a 12-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-3.7
Scoring +5.4
Points 5.5 PPG = +4.2
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.2
Creation +0.3
Creation 0.7 AST/g = +0.3
Turnovers -1.1
Turnovers 0.5/g = -1.1
Defense -0.7
Defense 0.3 STL, 0.1 BLK = -0.7
Hustle & Effort +2.0
Rebounds 1.9 RPG = +2.0
Raw Impact +5.9
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.6
Net Impact
-3.7
26th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 234 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 37th
7.3 PPG
Efficiency 95th
65.9% TS
Playmaking 17th
0.9 APG
Rebounding 16th
2.6 RPG
Defense 37th
+6.5/g
Hustle 28th
+9.2/g
Creation 34th
+1.90/g
Shot Making 36th
+4.77/g
TO Discipline 79th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Extreme volatility and a microscopic margin for error defined Jamal Cain's early-season run. Operating strictly as a deep reserve, his overall value swung wildly depending on whether he stayed within the flow of the offense or tried to do too much in limited minutes. The pitfalls of forcing the issue were glaring on 11/23 vs BOS, where a brutal 1-for-6 shooting performance yielded a disastrous -7.5 impact score. Even when his shots fell, hidden defensive costs often dragged him down. During 01/02 vs CHI, Cain tallied 8 points but still posted a -3.4 impact because of poor closeout technique and late weak-side rotations. Yet, he could occasionally tilt the floor without filling the basket. On 12/23 vs POR, he managed just 4 points but generated a +2.3 impact by relying entirely on elite energy and relentless off-ball activity. If he wants a permanent rotation spot, he must figure out how to bottle that hustle rather than hijacking possessions.

Jamal Cain’s late-season stretch was defined by a wildly erratic pendulum swing between game-wrecking hustle and total offensive invisibility. When fully engaged, he was a two-way terror. Despite scoring a modest 12 points on Mar 31 vs PHX, he generated an astronomical +24.4 overall impact score by pairing flawless shot selection with suffocating perimeter pressure that yielded a +16.3 defensive rating. Yet, that discipline routinely vanished, dragging down his value even when the ball went through the hoop. During Mar 21 vs LAL, Cain tallied 10 points but posted a -2.7 impact because he stubbornly settled for contested midrange jumpers early in the shot clock. His floor completely fell out on Mar 29 vs TOR, where a disastrously out-of-sync offensive performance resulted in zero points and a brutal -18.2 impact score in just eight minutes of action. Until he stops letting extreme passivity and tunnel vision sabotage his elite finishing ability, coaches will struggle to trust him on a nightly basis.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Cain has posted negative impact in 76% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 47% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -7.1, second-half: -0.4. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 2 games. Longest cold streak: 12 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 49 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

D. Mitchell 24.7 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 4
J. Walker 15.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 2
D. McDermott 15.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 2
K. Thompson 15.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
P. Siakam 14.0 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.5
PTS 7
D. Booker 13.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
L. Dončić 13.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
E. Gordon 12.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
N. Powell 12.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 2
A. Reaves 11.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

D. Mitchell 25.4 poss
FG% 87.5%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.67
PTS 17
K. Thompson 19.7 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.36
PTS 7
N. Powell 17.4 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 6
A. Reaves 15.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 2
D. Booker 14.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
P. Siakam 12.6 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.87
PTS 11
A. Nembhard 12.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 2
B. Mathurin 11.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. McDermott 11.7 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 3
D. White 11.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

42
Games
5.5
PPG
1.9
RPG
0.7
APG
0.3
SPG
0.1
BPG
49.4
FG%
38.7
3P%
84.0
FT%
12.2
MPG

GAME LOG

42 games played