DEN

2025-26 Season

JALEN PICKETT

Denver Nuggets | Guard | 6-2
Jalen Pickett
5.2 PPG
2.3 RPG
2.3 APG
16.1 MPG
-5.3 Impact

Pickett produces at an poor rate for a 16-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-5.3
Scoring +4.9
Points 5.2 PPG = +3.4
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.5
Creation +0.5
Creation 2.3 AST/g = +0.5
Turnovers -1.7
Turnovers 0.7/g = -1.7
Defense -0.2
Defense 0.3 STL, 0.1 BLK = -0.2
Hustle & Effort +1.7
Rebounds 2.3 RPG = +1.7
Raw Impact +5.2
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.5
Net Impact
-5.3
22th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 245 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 22th
6.2 PPG
Efficiency 31th
52.1% TS
Playmaking 52th
2.7 APG
Rebounding 46th
2.7 RPG
Defense 15th
+4.7/g
Hustle 23th
+6.3/g
Creation 36th
+2.33/g
Shot Making 80th
+8.58/g
TO Discipline 74th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Jalen Pickett’s first twenty games were defined by a maddening identity crisis, oscillating wildly between a suffocating defensive presence and an offensive rhythm-killer. Too often, his methodical pacing actively harmed the team's flow. On 12/31 vs TOR, he tallied 10 points—a high mark for his standards—but posted a disastrous -14.1 impact score because relentless perimeter shot-chucking and heavily contested jumpers dragged down his overall value. Conversely, when he simplified his role, Pickett found ways to drive winning basketball without filling up the stat sheet. During his 12/29 vs MIA appearance, he managed a mere 2 points but recorded a stellar +5.2 impact because his steady defensive pressure and mistake-free ball handling stabilized his minutes on the floor. Even his loudest offensive performance came with frustrating caveats. Despite erupting for 29 points on 01/05 vs PHI, his modest +3.8 impact was severely capped by blown pick-and-roll coverages that gave points right back to the opposition.

A brutal offensive slump and an eventual demotion to the bench defined this miserable twenty-game stretch for Jalen Pickett. The offense routinely stalled when he pounded the air out of the basketball. Look no further than the 01/22 vs WAS matchup, where his inability to generate dribble penetration yielded a catastrophic -11.1 impact score. Even when he managed to rack up traditional stats, hidden costs dragged his overall value into the gutter. He tallied 13 points and 7 assists on 01/23 vs MIL, but his impact plummeted to -11.6 because he burned multiple empty possessions on an inefficient 5-for-14 shooting night. After losing his starting job in early February, Pickett occasionally found ways to contribute without scoring. On 02/11 vs MEM, he logged just 3 points in nine minutes, yet posted a stellar +4.8 impact score by providing steady point-of-attack defense. Ultimately, his ponderous decision-making and lack of scoring gravity made him a severe liability for most of this run.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Pickett has posted negative impact in 84% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 45% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Pickett locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Small downward trend. First-half impact: -4.1, second-half: -6.6. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.

In a rough stretch — 22 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 22 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 73 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

R. Rollins 69.3 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 8
T. Johnson 39.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
V. Edgecombe 29.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 3
D. Robinson 27.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Fears 27.5 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 6
K. Ellis 23.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 3
I. Quickley 23.0 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 5
B. Carrington 22.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
A. Nembhard 19.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

R. Rollins 55.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 5
T. Johnson 31.5 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 6
V. Edgecombe 30.9 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
D. Robinson 23.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Fears 22.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 5
D. Daniels 20.0 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 4
T. Maxey 19.2 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.42
PTS 8
B. Carrington 18.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 3
K. Ellis 17.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
I. Quickley 16.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 3

SEASON STATS

50
Games
5.2
PPG
2.3
RPG
2.3
APG
0.3
SPG
0.1
BPG
42.2
FG%
38.6
3P%
78.9
FT%
16.1
MPG

GAME LOG

50 games played