WAS

2025-26 Season

JADEN HARDY

Washington Wizards | Guard | 6-3
Jaden Hardy
9.1 PPG
1.5 RPG
1.0 APG
15.5 MPG
-6.3 Impact

Hardy produces at an poor rate for a 16-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-6.3
Scoring +8.1
Points 9.1 PPG = +5.7
Shot Making above expected FG% = +2.4
Creation +0.4
Creation 1.0 AST/g = +0.4
Turnovers -2.5
Turnovers 1.1/g = -2.5
Defense -0.6
Defense 0.3 STL, 0.1 BLK = -0.6
Hustle & Effort +0.9
Rebounds 1.5 RPG = +0.9
Raw Impact +6.3
Baseline (game-average expected) −12.6
Net Impact
-6.3
12th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 245 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 54th
10.1 PPG
Efficiency 43th
53.8% TS
Playmaking 12th
1.1 APG
Rebounding 8th
1.6 RPG
Defense 3th
+2.6/g
Hustle 5th
+3.8/g
Creation 32th
+2.20/g
Shot Making 67th
+7.65/g
TO Discipline 30th
0.07/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Jaden Hardy’s early-season campaign was defined by maddening volatility, oscillating wildly between explosive microwave scoring and deeply destructive tunnel vision. Even when the ball went through the hoop, hidden costs often dragged down his overall value. During the 11/19 vs NYK matchup, he tallied 11 points but posted a dismal -3.9 impact score because his heavy reliance on contested, early-clock jumpers completely suffocated the offensive flow. His shot selection hit rock bottom on 11/22 vs MEM, where a barrage of forced perimeter attempts resulted in zero points and a catastrophic -9.4 impact score. Beyond his erratic trigger, Hardy routinely bled value on the other end of the floor by getting blown by in isolation matchups and missing basic defensive rotations. Yet, his raw talent occasionally salvaged the chaos. On 12/05 vs OKC, he finally put everything together, erupting for 23 points on 8-of-13 shooting. That blistering perimeter display single-handedly broke the opponent's defensive shell, earning him a massive +10.3 impact score.

This twenty-game stretch was defined by chronic tunnel vision and empty calories, as Jaden Hardy’s relentless shot-hunting frequently sabotaged his team. His performance on 01/15 vs UTA perfectly encapsulated this frustrating habit. Despite scoring 19 points, Hardy posted a dismal -5.0 impact score because he hijacked the offense to repeatedly jack up ill-advised shots. The hidden costs of his scoring were even more glaring on 02/26 vs ATL, where he managed 14 points but bled value with a catastrophic -14.5 impact score fueled by a brutal, selfish shooting display. Even when his raw numbers looked decent, terrible transition defense and an outright refusal to pass to open corner shooters dragged down his overall effectiveness. Conversely, a restrained approach yielded immediate dividends on 12/27 vs SAC. By taking high-quality looks and actually competing on the defensive end, he generated a robust +3.8 impact score despite contributing just 5 points. If Hardy wants to be a reliable rotation piece, he must realize that stalling possessions for contested isolation jumpers is a losing formula.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Hardy has posted negative impact in 84% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 41% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 1 games. Longest cold streak: 12 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 73 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

C. Williams 32.6 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 10
J. Fears 26.2 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 7
J. Murray 25.4 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 4
J. Clark 24.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.04
PTS 1
A. Mitchell 24.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 6
K. George 22.7 poss
FG% 14.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
J. Alvarado 22.5 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
I. Collier 21.6 poss
FG% 16.7%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 3
W. Clayton Jr. 20.4 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 7
A. Holiday 19.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 5

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

C. Williams 35.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4
J. Fears 28.7 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 8
I. Collier 24.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
J. Clark 23.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. Kispert 23.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 7
A. Holiday 23.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Clarkson 22.2 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 4
W. Clayton Jr. 21.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 4
S. Jones 20.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2
A. Mitchell 19.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 4

SEASON STATS

58
Games
9.1
PPG
1.5
RPG
1.0
APG
0.3
SPG
0.1
BPG
42.5
FG%
39.7
3P%
72.7
FT%
15.5
MPG

GAME LOG

58 games played