PHX

2025-26 Season

COLLIN GILLESPIE

Phoenix Suns | Guard | 6-1
Collin Gillespie
12.4 PPG
4.1 RPG
4.5 APG
28.3 MPG
+4.6 Impact

Gillespie produces at an above average rate for a 28-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+4.6
Scoring +11.4
Points 12.4 PPG = +7.9
Shot Making above expected FG% = +3.5
Creation +0.9
Creation 4.5 AST/g = +0.9
Turnovers -3.5
Turnovers 1.5/g = -3.5
Defense +1.5
Defense 1.2 STL, 0.2 BLK = +1.5
Hustle & Effort +3.4
Rebounds 4.1 RPG = +3.4
Raw Impact +13.7
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.1
Net Impact
+4.6
77th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 245 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 66th
12.4 PPG
Efficiency 47th
54.6% TS
Playmaking 80th
4.5 APG
Rebounding 77th
4.1 RPG
Defense 58th
+7.6/g
Hustle 62th
+10.2/g
Creation 70th
+3.41/g
Shot Making 84th
+8.97/g
TO Discipline 52th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Collin Gillespie's first twenty games were defined by a gritty evolution from an erratic bench sparkplug into a highly productive starting guard. Early on, his value hinged entirely on relentless energy rather than shooting volume. During the 10/25 vs DEN matchup, he managed just 6 points but generated a stellar +5.8 impact score because his scrappy point-of-attack defense completely disrupted the opponent. Conversely, poor decision-making often neutralized his scoring outbursts. He put up 13 points on 11/08 vs LAC, but a barrage of missed perimeter looks and atrocious shot selection dragged him to a -1.3 impact score. Eventually, Gillespie found a lethal rhythm from beyond the arc that forced a promotion into the starting lineup. By 11/28 vs OKC, he erupted for 24 points on the strength of six triples, posting a +2.6 impact score by completely transforming the team's half-court spacing.

Gillespie’s sudden promotion to the starting lineup triggered a wildly volatile stretch of basketball where his nightly value lived and died by the three-point line. When his jumper was falling, he looked like a legitimate offensive engine, erupting for 28 points on 8-of-14 shooting from deep to post a +12.7 impact score on 12/01 vs LAL. That perimeter explosion completely warped the opponent's defensive shell and opened up the floor for his teammates. However, his shot selection often betrayed him when the outside touch vanished. On 12/20 vs GSW, he tallied an above-average 16 points, but his inefficient volume shooting neutralized his otherwise solid defensive contributions, dragging his impact down to -0.3. Still, he fought to survive on the margins when his offense completely abandoned him. During a brutal 0-for-6 shooting night on 01/11 vs WAS, he finished with just 2 points but applied a clinic in point-of-attack defense to rescue his net rating from the abyss, limiting the damage to a -2.1 impact score.

Extreme volatility and erratic decision-making defined Collin Gillespie's mid-season stretch, turning him into a wild card who could single-handedly swing momentum in either direction. When he found his rhythm, the results were spectacular. On 02/03 vs POR, he erupted for 30 points and 10 assists, generating a massive +23.1 impact score by burying eight three-pointers to shatter a recent slump. Yet, that brilliant floor general routine often vanished without warning. During the 01/25 vs MIA matchup, a staggering lack of playmaking vision yielded zero assists and a disastrous -11.8 impact score as he completely crippled the offensive flow. Even when his shot attempts piled up, hidden costs frequently dragged down his actual value. He poured in 19 points on 02/21 vs ORL, but his impact remained in the red at -1.4 because his heavy scoring volume was severely undercut by poor shooting efficiency. Gillespie remains a chaotic presence who must learn to manage the game when his initial offensive reads fail.

This stretch of the season was defined by catastrophic shooting slumps and brutal perimeter inefficiency that temporarily cost Gillespie his starting job in early April. He routinely sabotaged his own playmaking with horrific shot selection. Take Mar 30 vs MEM as a prime example. Despite tallying a double-double with 11 points and 10 assists, his -11.3 impact score reveals the hidden cost of forcing bad shots during a dismal 4-for-16 shooting night. The wheels completely fell off just a day prior on Mar 29 vs UTA, where a staggering 0-for-8 shooting performance cratered the second-unit offense and resulted in a disastrous -17.5 impact rating. Yet, when he stopped forcing the issue offensively, he found ways to contribute through sheer grit. During his Apr 10 vs LAL start, he scored a meager 5 points but posted a +5.0 impact score by leaning entirely on high-level hustle plays and steady defensive positioning.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Volatile for his role. Gillespie has noticeable ups and downs, with scoring moving ~7 points between games.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 38% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Defensive difference-maker. Gillespie consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Small downward trend. First-half impact: +6.1, second-half: +3.1. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 11 games. Longest cold streak: 4 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 76 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

C. Wallace 77.8 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 16
D. DiVincenzo 70.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 42.9%
PPP 0.18
PTS 13
R. Rollins 57.5 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 37.5%
PPP 0.16
PTS 9
D. Fox 56.2 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 11
A. Thompson 52.0 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 4
T. Murphy III 48.0 poss
FG% 12.5%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 3
M. McBride 47.0 poss
FG% 12.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.04
PTS 2
R. Westbrook 47.0 poss
FG% 30.0%
3P% 16.7%
PPP 0.17
PTS 8
J. Carter 45.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.29
PTS 13
C. Spencer 44.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 5

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

R. Westbrook 67.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 10
D. DiVincenzo 59.0 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 3
C. Wallace 58.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 4
J. Champagnie 52.4 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 6
S. Curry 46.4 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 11
T. Hardaway Jr. 44.1 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.23
PTS 10
R. Rollins 43.9 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 7
C. Spencer 42.9 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 10
T. Maxey 42.5 poss
FG% 11.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 7

SEASON STATS

82
Games
12.4
PPG
4.1
RPG
4.5
APG
1.2
SPG
0.2
BPG
41.7
FG%
40.0
3P%
87.6
FT%
28.3
MPG

GAME LOG

82 games played