DEN

2025-26 Season

CAMERON JOHNSON

Denver Nuggets | Forward | 6-8
Cameron Johnson
12.2 PPG
3.7 RPG
2.4 APG
30.5 MPG
+1.3 Impact

Johnson produces at an above average rate for a 30-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+1.3
Scoring +11.3
Points 12.2 PPG = +8.5
Shot Making above expected FG% = +2.8
Creation +0.9
Creation 2.4 AST/g = +0.9
Turnovers -2.1
Turnovers 0.9/g = -2.1
Defense -0.4
Defense 0.7 STL, 0.4 BLK = -0.4
Hustle & Effort +2.9
Rebounds 3.7 RPG = +2.9
Raw Impact +12.6
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.3
Net Impact
+1.3
60th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 234 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 67th
12.2 PPG
Efficiency 77th
60.4% TS
Playmaking 70th
2.4 APG
Rebounding 42th
3.7 RPG
Defense 30th
+5.7/g
Hustle 33th
+10.2/g
Creation 49th
+2.37/g
Shot Making 71th
+7.25/g
TO Discipline 91th
0.03/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Cameron Johnson’s opening twenty games were defined by a frustratingly volatile blend of erratic perimeter shooting and glaring defensive lapses. Even when his shot completely abandoned him, he occasionally found ways to contribute without the basketball. During a scoreless outing on 11/07 vs GSW, Johnson still managed a positive +0.7 impact score because his excellent weak-side rotations fueled a robust +9.3 defensive rating. Conversely, his actual scoring outbursts frequently carried steep hidden costs. On 11/17 vs CHI, he poured in 19 points on blistering 5-for-7 shooting from deep, yet finished with a -1.2 impact due to costly defensive lapses and an inability to secure rebounds that entirely offset his offense. He finally put the pieces together on 11/28 vs SAS. Erupting for 28 points, he posted a massive +11.9 impact score. That rare dominant performance was driven by a lethal combination of high-volume perimeter shooting and excellent hustle that overwhelmed the opposition.

This stretch was defined by maddening volatility, swinging violently between lethal two-way spacing and absolute offensive craters. When his jumper was falling, he looked untouchable. During the 12/22 vs UTA game, he hit all six of his three-point attempts for 20 points, generating a +9.3 impact score purely through flawless perimeter shooting. Yet, that offensive brilliance sometimes masked hidden costs on the other end of the floor. Look at the 03/12 vs SAS matchup. He scored 15 points on an efficient 6-for-8 shooting night, but still registered a -4.4 impact because ill-timed defensive rotations bled points. Worse still were the nights his rhythm completely vanished. In the 03/01 vs MIN contest, he posted a brutal -10.1 impact score with zero points, actively sinking the offense by forcing contested jumpers that ignited opponent fast breaks.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Johnson's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 50% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Johnson locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -0.3, second-half: +2.8. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 5 games. Longest cold streak: 6 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 49 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. Smith Jr. 86.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 5
D. Avdija 54.7 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 15
D. DeRozan 53.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 4
J. Walker 50.9 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 4
R. Westbrook 40.5 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 9
Z. LaVine 40.4 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 14
K. Durant 38.5 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.18
PTS 7
J. Fears 38.4 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 6
C. Flagg 38.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4
N. Marshall 37.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 8

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Smith Jr. 109.7 poss
FG% 38.9%
3P% 55.6%
PPP 0.19
PTS 21
R. Westbrook 58.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 42.9%
PPP 0.26
PTS 15
N. Marshall 55.1 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.13
PTS 7
A. Thompson 45.8 poss
FG% 58.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 16
J. Walker 44.0 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 7
J. Kuminga 37.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
J. Champagnie 36.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 5
G. Jackson 33.7 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 13
T. Murphy III 33.6 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4
W. Richard 33.4 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

55
Games
12.2
PPG
3.7
RPG
2.4
APG
0.7
SPG
0.4
BPG
47.8
FG%
42.6
3P%
83.9
FT%
30.5
MPG

GAME LOG

55 games played