LAL

2025-26 Season

BRONNY JAMES

Los Angeles Lakers | Guard | 6-2
Bronny James
2.8 PPG
0.5 RPG
1.2 APG
8.8 MPG
-7.4 Impact

James produces at an poor rate for a 9-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-7.4
Scoring +2.7
Points 2.8 PPG = +1.9
Shot Making above expected FG% = +0.8
Creation +0.3
Creation 1.2 AST/g = +0.3
Turnovers -1.5
Turnovers 0.6/g = -1.5
Defense +0.3
Defense 0.4 STL, 0.1 BLK = +0.3
Hustle & Effort +0.4
Rebounds 0.5 RPG = +0.4
Raw Impact +2.2
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.6
Net Impact
-7.4
4th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 245 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 8th
4.3 PPG
Efficiency 6th
42.8% TS
Playmaking 29th
1.8 APG
Rebounding 1th
1.0 RPG
Defense 10th
+4.4/g
Hustle 5th
+3.8/g
Creation 25th
+1.93/g
Shot Making 8th
+3.66/g
TO Discipline 34th
0.07/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Bronny James spent the first twenty games of the season trapped in a frustrating cycle of offensive passivity and empty cardio stints. He simply refused to look at the rim. During a twenty-minute run on 10/27 vs POR, he went scoreless while his complete lack of shooting gravity allowed defenders to freely roam and clog the paint, saddling him with a brutal -6.0 impact score. When he finally decided to attack closeouts with aggression on 11/08 vs ATL, the results drastically improved, yielding a season-high nine points and a +2.3 impact mark. Yet, even when the jumper occasionally fell, hidden defensive costs often ruined his overall footprint. On 11/18 vs UTA, James drilled his only shot attempt to tally three points in just four minutes, but he still posted a dismal -4.7 impact score because opponents mercilessly hunted and exploited him on the other end of the floor. If he wants to stick in a crowded rotation, he must find a way to consistently threaten set defenses without bleeding points on the perimeter.

This stretch of the season was defined by a harsh reality: Bronny James could thrive in microscopic bursts, but completely unraveled when handed extended rotational freedom. Look at his brief eight-minute appearance on Jan 28 vs CLE. He scored just 8 points, yet generated a massive +5.5 impact score because his flawless shot selection and confident perimeter execution created immense offensive value without requiring high volume. Conversely, longer leashes usually ended in disaster, as seen on Feb 10 vs SAS. He scored 12 points on efficient 5-for-10 shooting, but hidden on-court costs drastically overshadowed his relentless hustle and dragged him down to a brutal -7.8 impact score. The bottom fell out completely on Mar 30 vs WAS. Given 26 minutes of run, he posted an abysmal -18.3 impact score by repeatedly settling for heavily contested pull-up jumpers that killed offensive possessions and fueled opponent fast breaks. Until he stops forcing terrible perimeter looks, his utility belongs strictly in garbage time.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. James has posted negative impact in 95% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 71% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Average defender. James doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -8.5, second-half: -6.5. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 1 games. Longest cold streak: 24 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 65 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

S. Cooper 20.0 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 4
S. Sharpe 17.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Harper 14.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Holiday 12.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 3
J. McCain 11.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 3
K. Murray 10.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
V. Krejčí 10.5 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.38
PTS 4
C. Bryant 10.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 3
K. Wallace 10.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 2
T. McConnell 9.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 2

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

S. Sharpe 18.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Holiday 16.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 2
D. Harper 15.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 5
D. Mitchell 14.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 3
S. Cooper 12.6 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 2
K. Murray 12.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. McConnell 10.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 2
J. Hardy 10.4 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.58
PTS 6
J. Watkins 9.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 2
C. Love 9.6 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.83
PTS 8

SEASON STATS

43
Games
2.8
PPG
0.5
RPG
1.2
APG
0.4
SPG
0.1
BPG
40.9
FG%
38.6
3P%
85.7
FT%
8.8
MPG

GAME LOG

43 games played