GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

LAL Los Angeles Lakers
S Rui Hachimura 41.5m
14
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
+5.3

A surprisingly negative overall impact (-0.4) reveals the hidden costs of his performance despite efficient shooting. While his defensive metrics (+7.0) and shot-making bonuses were strong, a complete lack of creation and likely turnover damage erased his value. He operated as a pure play-finisher, but his inability to generate looks for others or secure the glass severely limited his ceiling.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 70.0%
USG% 13.6%
Net Rtg +7.2
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 41.5m
Scoring +10.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +0.6
Defense +4.7
Turnovers -4.7
STL 3
BLK 2
TO 2
S LeBron James 38.4m
19
pts
8
reb
13
ast
Impact
+11.4

Elite orchestration and highly efficient scoring drove a robust overall impact (+7.8). He racked up massive creation credit by manipulating the defense for a barrage of assists, while his pristine shooting yielded strong shot-making bonuses. Combined with solid defensive engagement (+5.7), he completely dictated the terms of engagement whenever he was on the floor.

Shooting
FG 9/15 (60.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 59.8%
USG% 21.7%
Net Rtg +11.4
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.4m
Scoring +14.0
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +4.9
Hustle +2.4
Defense +4.3
Turnovers -4.7
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 2
S Luke Kennard 38.3m
27
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
+15.2

A scorching-hot shooting display generated massive shot-making bonuses, driving a stellar overall impact (+6.2). By drilling all of his three-point attempts, he completely warped the opposing defense and avoided any miss penalties. This lethal off-ball gravity more than made up for his typical lack of defensive resistance (+0.5).

Shooting
FG 9/13 (69.2%)
3PT 5/5 (100.0%)
FT 4/6 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 86.3%
USG% 20.2%
Net Rtg +7.5
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.3m
Scoring +23.4
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +6.9
Hustle +1.2
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -7.1
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
S Deandre Ayton 35.0m
19
pts
11
reb
2
ast
Impact
+18.3

Ruthless interior efficiency fueled a highly positive impact score (+7.6) as he dominated the painted area. By converting nearly all of his attempts, he generated massive shot-making bonuses while completely avoiding the miss penalties that often plague him. This hyper-efficient finishing, combined with adequate rim protection (+2.5), showcased his ceiling when he attacks with intent.

Shooting
FG 8/10 (80.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 83.9%
USG% 19.4%
Net Rtg +10.4
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.0m
Scoring +17.4
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +3.3
Hustle +12.0
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -5.3
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 3
S Marcus Smart 33.6m
15
pts
2
reb
8
ast
Impact
-8.7

Catastrophic miss penalties from the perimeter completely erased his creation value, sinking his impact score deep into the red (-8.6). While his passing generated solid offensive flow, his insistence on forcing low-quality jumpers severely damaged the team's efficiency. Even his trademark defensive disruption (+1.7) wasn't enough to offset the damage of his erratic shot selection.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 4/8 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 48.3%
USG% 30.0%
Net Rtg -5.9
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.6m
Scoring +8.1
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.4
Turnovers -11.8
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 5
3
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.6

Severe floor-spacing limitations became glaringly obvious during a highly damaging rotation stint (-6.4). Without his usual chaotic energy or hustle contributions, his complete lack of defensive disruption (-2.2) and offensive passivity left him completely exposed. He essentially operated as empty cardio, failing to tilt the floor on either end.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 5.7%
Net Rtg +14.7
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.4m
Scoring +2.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +1.5
Defense -4.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Jake LaRavia 18.1m
6
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
-5.2

Scraping out a slightly positive impact (+0.9), he survived by embracing the gritty margins rather than forcing his offense. By strictly limiting his shot attempts, he avoided the heavy miss penalties that usually tank his value, relying instead on solid defensive rotations (+2.3) to stay afloat. This low-usage, mistake-free stint highlights how he can survive in the rotation when his jumper isn't falling.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 63.0%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg +22.0
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.1m
Scoring +4.2
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.6
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
Jaxson Hayes 12.7m
4
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-12.6

Failing to anchor the paint defensively (-1.8) or assert himself on the glass completely tanked his impact score (-4.4). Despite being perfect from the field, his extreme passivity and lack of vertical spacing rendered him a ghost on offense. This brief, low-energy stint highlighted his struggles when he fails to weaponize his athleticism.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 86.2%
USG% 10.3%
Net Rtg +12.6
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.7m
Scoring +3.5
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.2
Hustle +0.3
Defense -4.5
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-14.4

A microscopic stint defined by extreme passivity resulted in a deeply negative impact score (-4.8). He refused to look at the rim, generating zero creation or shot-making value while bleeding points on the defensive end (-1.5). This brief cameo perfectly encapsulated his ongoing struggle to assert himself against NBA rotation players.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +50.0
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.8m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
HOU Houston Rockets
S Amen Thompson 43.1m
17
pts
7
reb
7
ast
Impact
+7.5

A massive defensive rating (+5.7) kept him in the green despite severe offensive friction. Heavy miss penalties dragged down his shot-making metrics, reflecting an ongoing struggle to punish sagging defenders on the perimeter. His downhill creation still generated high-value looks, but erratic finishing at the rim capped his overall ceiling.

Shooting
FG 7/18 (38.9%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 3/6 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 41.2%
USG% 22.1%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 43.1m
Scoring +7.6
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +3.3
Hustle +7.9
Defense +2.6
Turnovers -4.7
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 2
16
pts
12
reb
0
ast
Impact
+19.6

Stout defensive work (+6.0) anchored his value on a night where his jumper ran cold. Heavy miss penalties from his high volume of clanked perimeter looks severely depressed his scoring and shot-making metrics. While he spaced the floor adequately, his inability to convert those outside attempts prevented a massive impact score.

Shooting
FG 5/14 (35.7%)
3PT 3/9 (33.3%)
FT 3/5 (60.0%)
Advanced
TS% 49.4%
USG% 15.7%
Net Rtg -8.1
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 43.0m
Scoring +7.8
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +3.6
Hustle +15.2
Defense +4.4
Turnovers -2.4
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
S Alperen Sengun 36.0m
19
pts
8
reb
6
ast
Impact
+10.1

A brutal finishing night completely erased his value as a hub, dropping his overall impact into the red (-0.8). The severe miss penalties from a barrage of clanked interior attempts overshadowed his solid creation numbers from the high post. When his touch abandons him like this, the lack of defensive disruption (+0.7) leaves him with no margin for error.

Shooting
FG 6/19 (31.6%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 7/9 (77.8%)
Advanced
TS% 41.4%
USG% 27.7%
Net Rtg -6.0
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.0m
Scoring +8.5
Creation +3.7
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +10.2
Defense +0.1
Turnovers -4.6
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 3
S Reed Sheppard 35.9m
17
pts
1
reb
8
ast
Impact
-4.1

Catastrophic shot selection completely torpedoed his overall impact (-8.9) despite a barrage of made threes. The massive miss penalties from his high volume of bricked perimeter attempts completely wiped out the positive creation value generated by his passing. He operated as a chaotic sparkplug, but the sheer volume of low-quality looks bled value on every possession.

Shooting
FG 6/20 (30.0%)
3PT 5/14 (35.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 42.5%
USG% 27.9%
Net Rtg -9.9
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.9m
Scoring +6.8
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +5.3
Hustle +0.3
Defense +2.3
Turnovers -9.5
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 4
S Josh Okogie 26.4m
7
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
+0.6

Defensive disruption (+3.1) continues to be his sole saving grace in an otherwise invisible offensive profile. He avoided the heavy miss penalties that usually plague him by strictly limiting his shot attempts, allowing his point-of-attack pressure to keep his head above water. This low-volume, high-energy pattern is the only way he survives rotation minutes.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 71.7%
USG% 8.1%
Net Rtg -19.2
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.4m
Scoring +5.1
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +0.0
Defense +4.1
Turnovers +0.0
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
Tari Eason 23.9m
16
pts
10
reb
2
ast
Impact
+23.3

Flawless shot-making and relentless defensive disruption (+6.0) fueled a massive impact score (+15.9). By converting every single one of his attempts, he generated a massive scoring bonus while completely avoiding any miss penalties. This perfect offensive execution, combined with his chaotic perimeter pressure, made him an absolute terror.

Shooting
FG 7/7 (100.0%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 107.5%
USG% 11.9%
Net Rtg -10.0
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.9m
Scoring +15.5
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +3.7
Hustle +11.7
Defense +4.7
Turnovers -2.4
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 1
Clint Capela 11.3m
2
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.6

A complete lack of offensive gravity and rebounding presence rendered his brief stint highly detrimental (-3.0). Without his usual hustle contributions (+0.0) or rim-deterrence (+0.3) to fall back on, he was essentially running empty cardio. This micro-shift highlighted his inability to influence the game when he isn't dominating the glass.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 11.5%
Net Rtg -20.3
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.3m
Scoring +1.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +1.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-18.6

An absolute disaster class in decision-making resulted in a devastatingly low impact score (-10.5) during his brief stint. Brick penalties from his missed perimeter shots combined with negative defensive value (-1.5) to completely sink the second unit. His inability to stay within the flow of the offense turned him into a massive liability.

Shooting
FG 0/4 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -4.8
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.8m
Scoring -2.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -3.1
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
4
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.8

He managed to stay in the green (+3.8) despite heavy miss penalties from a frigid shooting night. Solid positional defense (+0.8) and a lack of crippling turnovers allowed him to survive his offensive limitations. This brief stint was defined by his ability to execute the scheme without actively sabotaging the unit.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 34.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -19.8
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.5m
Scoring +1.1
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +5.1
Defense +1.5
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0