2025-26 Season
BONES HYLAND
2025-26 Season
BONES HYLAND
PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology
TEAM COMPARISON
of 13 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)
Similar Players
Same position, closest production profile this season.
SKILL DNA
Percentile rank vs 245 Guards with 10+ games
THE SEASON SO FAR
Bones Hyland’s early season was defined by maddening volatility, oscillating wildly between game-breaking microwave scoring and absolute offensive sabotage. When he caught fire, he was an undeniable weapon. Look at his explosive outing on 11/07 vs UTA, where he poured in 12 points in a mere 9 minutes to post a massive +9.4 impact score by shifting momentum with a perfect shooting barrage. Yet, giving him a longer leash often yielded disastrous results. During a rare start on 12/17 vs MEM, Hyland managed 12 points and 5 assists but dragged the team down to a brutal -8.8 impact. Firing away with errant shot selection from beyond the arc—bricking seven of his nine three-point attempts—he severely handicapped the offense despite his double-digit scoring. Even when his box score looked respectable off the bench, hidden costs frequently eroded his overall value. On 12/25 vs DEN, he tallied 11 points and 5 assists but still registered a -1.6 impact because his tendency to over-dribble and throw errant transition passes completely stagnated the second unit's flow.
This deeply frustrating stretch was defined by a wildly volatile slump where erratic shot selection and defensive apathy routinely sabotaged the second unit. The absolute nadir arrived on 12/31 vs ATL, where his rhythm-killing shot-hunting resulted in a disastrous 0-for-7 shooting night and a catastrophic -15.2 impact score. Even when the ball actually went through the hoop, hidden costs often dragged him down. During the 01/17 vs SAS matchup, he hit all three of his field goal attempts for 7 points, yet still posted a -0.4 impact because his poor defense immediately gave those points right back to the opponent. He remains a tantalizing but maddening player because he can occasionally tilt the floor entirely on his own. He temporarily shattered his slump on 01/13 vs MIL with an explosive 23-point outburst, generating a massive +12.6 impact by catching fire from deep and finally making crisp decisions. Ultimately, relying on his isolation-heavy game feels like playing Russian roulette with the team's offensive flow.
A maddeningly volatile rollercoaster of instant-offense highs and defensive-liability lows defined Bones Hyland's midseason stretch off the bench. His raw scoring totals frequently painted a deceptive picture of his actual value on the floor. Against UTA on 03/18, Hyland poured in 18 points but posted a -4.4 impact score, as his scoring volume merely masked the point-of-attack defensive vulnerabilities bleeding points on the other end. Conversely, he salvaged a +2.0 impact mark against PHI on 02/22 despite finishing with just three points on a dreadful 1-for-5 shooting night. He earned that positive rating by unexpectedly locking in defensively and generating extra possessions through sheer hustle. When both his shot and his defensive focus vanished, the results were catastrophic. This was painfully obvious against MEM on 03/03, where erratic shot selection and defensive liabilities culminated in a brutal -10.4 impact score. Hyland remains the ultimate wild card, capable of shooting his team into—or completely out of—any basketball game.
IMPACT TIMELINE
Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.
Inconsistent. Hyland has clear good-night/bad-night splits, with scoring swinging ~7 points between games. You're never quite sure which version shows up.
Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 53% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.
Average defender. Hyland doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.
Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -5.6, second-half: -1.7. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.
Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 4 games. Longest cold streak: 7 games.
MATCHUP HISTORY
Based on 77 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.
ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM
His shooting stats against each primary defender this season
ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED
How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.
SEASON STATS
GAME LOG
72 games played
Don't miss tomorrow's analysis
GET YOUR TEAM'S BREAKDOWN
Free daily analysis with Net Impact player ratings. Delivered every morning after your team plays.
Create Free AccountAlready have one? Log in