WAS

2025-26 Season

ANTHONY GILL

Washington Wizards | Forward | 6-7
Anthony Gill
5.8 PPG
2.9 RPG
1.3 APG
17.3 MPG
-2.5 Impact

Gill produces at an below average rate for a 17-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-2.5
Scoring +6.6
Points 5.8 PPG = +5.3
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.3
Creation +0.4
Creation 1.3 AST/g = +0.4
Turnovers -1.8
Turnovers 0.7/g = -1.8
Defense -0.4
Defense 0.6 STL, 0.4 BLK = -0.4
Hustle & Effort +3.1
Rebounds 2.9 RPG = +3.1
Raw Impact +7.9
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.4
Net Impact
-2.5
35th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 234 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 40th
7.8 PPG
Efficiency 88th
63.0% TS
Playmaking 54th
1.8 APG
Rebounding 43th
3.8 RPG
Defense 24th
+5.2/g
Hustle 48th
+11.7/g
Creation 56th
+2.52/g
Shot Making 23th
+3.93/g
TO Discipline 81th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Anthony Gill’s early season was defined by the chaotic extremes of deep-bench spot duty, oscillating between hyper-efficient cameos and invisible cardio sessions. He occasionally salvaged his microscopic offensive role through sheer grit. On 01/22 vs DEN, he scored just two points but generated a massive +5.7 impact score by racking up defensive stops (+5.2 def) and hustle plays (+1.6 hustle). Conversely, longer leashes often exposed the hidden costs of his game. During his longest outing on 01/07 vs PHI, Gill poured in 8 points on sharp shooting, yet still posted a miserable -3.0 impact because a glaring lack of overall involvement and low hustle metrics dragged his net score into the red. His value wildly fluctuated based purely on his energy level. On 12/04 vs BOS, a drastic reduction in volume and zero hustle stats yielded a dismal -4.5 impact in just five minutes of action. Ultimately, Gill remains a purely situational piece who must execute flawlessly around the margins to justify his floor time.

Extreme volatility defined Anthony Gill's midseason stretch, as the veteran big man swung wildly between masterclasses in blue-collar dirty work and crippling bouts of offensive passivity. He often generated immense value without filling the box score. On 02/03 vs NYK, despite logging zero points and zero rebounds in seven minutes, he posted a +3.0 impact score by anchoring the backline with flawless defensive rotations and vocal leadership. His absolute peak arrived on 02/19 vs IND, where veteran savvy and relentless activity on the glass fueled a massive +13.3 impact rating alongside 13 points and 8 rebounds. Yet, Gill's effectiveness frequently cratered when his defensive discipline vanished. During the 03/08 vs NOP matchup, he managed an efficient 11 points on 5-of-7 shooting, but underlying defensive metrics dragged him down to a -4.0 impact mark. When he embraced his role as a physical screener and communicator, he was an essential rotational piece. However, when he drifted into passive positioning, he became a distinct liability.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Gill's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 74% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Gill locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -5.1, second-half: -0.0. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 3 games. Longest cold streak: 22 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 74 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. Landale 49.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 5
M. Potter 47.6 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 9
R. Kalkbrenner 34.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Hayes 31.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
G. Santos 28.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 4
P. Reed 26.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
O. Okongwu 25.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Drummond 25.4 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 4
D. DeRozan 25.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Duren 24.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 3

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

M. Potter 47.3 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 12
R. Kalkbrenner 41.2 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 8
J. Landale 40.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5
J. Hayes 32.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 7
P. Reed 28.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 6
J. Konchar 28.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
J. Duren 27.2 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.44
PTS 12
K. Porziņģis 25.0 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 7
G. Santos 24.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 3
A. Drummond 24.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 6

SEASON STATS

55
Games
5.8
PPG
2.9
RPG
1.3
APG
0.6
SPG
0.4
BPG
62.8
FG%
35.4
3P%
73.9
FT%
17.3
MPG

GAME LOG

55 games played