CHA

2025-26 Season

TRE MANN

Charlotte Hornets | Guard | 6-4
Tre Mann
5.4 PPG
1.7 RPG
1.6 APG
12.5 MPG
-6.2 Impact

Mann produces at an poor rate for a 12-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-6.2
Scoring +4.2
Points 5.4 PPG = +2.8
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.4
Creation +0.4
Creation 1.6 AST/g = +0.4
Turnovers -2.4
Turnovers 1.0/g = -2.4
Hustle & Effort +1.3
Rebounds 1.7 RPG = +1.3
Raw Impact +3.5
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.7
Net Impact
-6.2
13th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 245 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 28th
7.1 PPG
Efficiency 8th
45.3% TS
Playmaking 36th
2.1 APG
Rebounding 29th
2.3 RPG
Defense 15th
+4.7/g
Hustle 76th
+11.4/g
Creation 59th
+3.08/g
Shot Making 36th
+5.52/g
TO Discipline 19th
0.08/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Tre Mann's first twenty games were defined by a frustrating paradox, as his relentless appetite for volume shooting routinely sabotaged his team's broader offensive rhythm. Look no further than his start on 11/07 vs MIA. He stuffed the box score with 20 points, 9 rebounds, and 7 assists, but a ghastly 7-for-24 shooting performance resulted in a -12.5 impact score because his empty possessions completely stalled the offense. When the shots were not falling at all, he became an outright liability on the floor. On 10/25 vs PHI, errant shot selection and an inability to finish through contact torpedoed his value, yielding an abysmal -15.2 impact score. Ironically, Mann was actually at his best when he stopped forcing the issue as a primary scorer. Despite logging just 4 points on 11/17 vs TOR, he posted a stellar +6.3 impact score by maximizing his short stint with highly disruptive point-of-attack defense. To survive in this league, he must realize that defensive hustle matters far more than tossing up contested jumpers.

Tre Mann's midseason stretch was defined by erratic bench minutes where aimless dribbling and defensive lapses vastly outweighed his occasional flashes of brilliance. He briefly looked like an elite sixth man on 01/10 vs UTA, pouring in 20 points in just 12 minutes to post a staggering +12.9 impact score through pure microwave shot-creation. That outlier performance was a total mirage. During a brutal showing on 02/05 vs HOU, Mann forced wild drives into heavy traffic to shoot 1-for-10 from the floor, tanking his net impact to an abysmal -8.8. His careless ball security made him a massive liability on most nights. Yet, he occasionally found ways to contribute without filling the basket, as seen on 02/11 vs ATL. Despite scoring only 5 points, Mann generated a +4.3 impact score by utilizing active hands in the passing lanes and applying relentless on-ball defensive pressure. Unfortunately, those gritty shifts were simply too rare to salvage a deeply flawed block of games.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Mann has posted negative impact in 83% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 28% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Small downward trend. First-half impact: -4.9, second-half: -7.6. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.

In a rough stretch — 16 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 16 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 68 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

C. McCollum 33.7 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.18
PTS 6
R. Rollins 28.8 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
D. Mitchell 27.8 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
P. Larsson 19.9 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.4
PTS 8
G. Trent Jr. 19.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
Q. Grimes 19.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Jaquez Jr. 18.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Smith 18.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. Johnson 17.4 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.17
PTS 3
R. Sheppard 15.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

C. McCollum 26.8 poss
FG% 85.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.56
PTS 15
P. Larsson 25.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.28
PTS 7
D. Smith 25.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
G. Trent Jr. 24.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 8
C. Kispert 22.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
W. Clayton Jr. 21.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.37
PTS 8
K. Kuzma 19.5 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 6
Q. Grimes 19.2 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.73
PTS 14
D. Mitchell 18.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2
T. Johnson 18.4 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

54
Games
5.4
PPG
1.7
RPG
1.6
APG
0.5
SPG
0.1
BPG
35.6
FG%
31.6
3P%
86.2
FT%
12.5
MPG

GAME LOG

54 games played