CHI

2025-26 Season

TRE JONES

Chicago Bulls | Guard | 6-1
Tre Jones
14.1 PPG
3.1 RPG
5.4 APG
27.0 MPG
+6.1 Impact

Jones produces at an elite rate for a 27-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+6.1
Scoring +13.1
Points 14.1 PPG = +10.5
Shot Making above expected FG% = +2.6
Creation +1.5
Creation 5.4 AST/g = +1.5
Turnovers -3.3
Turnovers 1.4/g = -3.3
Defense +1.9
Defense 1.2 STL, 0.2 BLK = +1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.1
Rebounds 3.1 RPG = +2.1
Raw Impact +15.3
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.2
Net Impact
+6.1
83th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 245 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 73th
14.1 PPG
Efficiency 96th
62.8% TS
Playmaking 85th
5.4 APG
Rebounding 55th
3.1 RPG
Defense 85th
+10.8/g
Hustle 62th
+10.2/g
Creation 87th
+4.36/g
Shot Making 70th
+7.87/g
TO Discipline 57th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Tre Jones spent the opening quarter of the 2025-26 campaign navigating a jarring mid-November demotion to the bench, transforming from a steady starter into a volatile second-unit sparkplug. When he played passively or shied away from physicality, his value quietly tanked. Look at the 11/08 vs CLE matchup, where he poured in 17 points but posted a negative -0.9 impact score because his inability to finish through contact at the rim dragged down the overall offense. Conversely, when Jones engaged his point-of-attack defense, he became an absolute menace. He posted a massive +13.2 impact score off the pine on 11/28 vs CHA, dominating defensively by consistently blowing up pick-and-roll action. He can also dictate games without heavy scoring, beautifully evidenced on 12/17 vs CLE where he racked up 11 assists and a +10.0 impact on just 11 points by making surgical pick-and-roll reads to carve up the defense. The difference between a liability and a game-changer for Jones entirely hinges on his willingness to attack.

This stretch was defined by a volatile tug-of-war between offensive mastery and crippling passivity as Jones bounced between the starting lineup and the bench. On 12/31 vs NOP, his promotion to the starting five resulted in an immaculate +10.8 impact score. He poured in 20 points and 12 assists on a perfect 7-for-7 shooting night, carving up the defense with surgical orchestration. Yet, that aggression routinely vanished. During an ugly -10.6 impact showing on 01/07 vs DET, his elite playmaking vision yielded 12 assists but was entirely negated by a severe inability to finish inside the arc on 1-for-7 shooting. He answered his critics just days later on 01/13 vs HOU with an absolute masterclass. Punishing drop coverage with blistering efficiency, Jones racked up 34 points on 11-for-12 shooting to post a staggering +22.1 impact score. When he attacked the rim, he looked like an elite floor general, but his overall value cratered the moment he deferred.

This stretch of basketball was defined by maddening volatility. Jones swung violently between masterful floor orchestration and baffling mental lapses. When he dialed in his decision-making, he was an absolute terror. He orchestrated a massive +12.5 impact score on 03/05 vs PHX by combining hyper-efficient shot creation with a flawless offensive rhythm. He even found ways to survive his own shooting slumps, scraping together a +0.6 impact score during a dismal six-point outing on 12/14 vs NOP purely through phenomenal defensive pressure. Yet, he routinely sabotaged his own scoring outbursts with hidden costs. An efficient 15-point night on 04/01 vs IND was completely derailed by a disastrous string of unforced passing errors, plummeting his impact to a brutal -6.0. He remains a highly capable playmaker, but his inability to consistently balance scoring efficiency with ball security keeps his true value in constant flux.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Very consistent. Jones posts positive impact in 77% of games — you almost always get a productive night. Scoring varies by ~6 points, but the overall contribution stays positive.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 68% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Jones consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: +4.2, second-half: +7.8. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 12 games. Longest cold streak: 3 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 66 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. Brunson 71.9 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 14
D. Jenkins 64.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.03
PTS 2
T. Maxey 45.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 8
R. Rollins 41.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 6
T. Young 41.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 7
B. Miller 40.2 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
S. Merrill 39.0 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 12
A. Black 38.9 poss
FG% 14.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.08
PTS 3
D. Fox 37.4 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 12
J. Fears 37.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 7

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Brunson 81.5 poss
FG% 42.1%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 22
D. Jenkins 66.0 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 6
T. Young 65.8 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 19
R. Rollins 54.6 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 7
J. Fears 52.5 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 11
A. Black 46.9 poss
FG% 71.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 12
T. Maxey 46.1 poss
FG% 46.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.37
PTS 17
R. Sheppard 45.8 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.04
PTS 2
V. Edgecombe 45.3 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 3
W. Clayton Jr. 39.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4

SEASON STATS

65
Games
14.1
PPG
3.1
RPG
5.4
APG
1.2
SPG
0.2
BPG
55.3
FG%
31.5
3P%
84.1
FT%
27.0
MPG

GAME LOG

65 games played