WAS

2025-26 Season

TRAE YOUNG

Washington Wizards | Guard | 6-2
Trae Young
17.9 PPG
2.0 RPG
8.0 APG
25.6 MPG
+2.7 Impact

Young produces at an above average rate for a 26-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+2.7
Scoring +16.3
Points 17.9 PPG = +12.8
Shot Making above expected FG% = +3.5
Creation +2.7
Creation 8.0 AST/g = +2.7
Turnovers -6.1
Turnovers 2.6/g = -6.1
Defense -0.2
Defense 0.9 STL, 0.1 BLK = -0.2
Hustle & Effort +1.1
Rebounds 2.0 RPG = +1.1
Raw Impact +13.8
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.1
Net Impact
+2.7
72th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 245 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 86th
17.9 PPG
Efficiency 94th
62.2% TS
Playmaking 98th
8.0 APG
Rebounding 19th
2.0 RPG
Defense 42th
+6.8/g
Hustle 12th
+5.1/g
Creation 100th
+7.82/g
Shot Making 76th
+8.29/g
TO Discipline 6th
0.10/min

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Young's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~8 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 43% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive impact is minimal for a 26-minute player. Not generating enough contests, rim protection, or forced turnovers to move the needle.

Small downward trend. First-half impact: +4.1, second-half: +1.6. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 26 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

T. Jones 65.8 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 19
J. Suggs 41.5 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 8
I. Quickley 32.2 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 7
M. Bridges 29.4 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
D. Mitchell 28.7 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.38
PTS 11
C. White 26.9 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.37
PTS 10
C. Wallace 21.0 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.48
PTS 10
A. Dosunmu 20.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
I. Okoro 19.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 4
L. Dort 18.9 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 4

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

I. Okoro 54.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 4
T. Jones 41.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 7
J. Suggs 38.9 poss
FG% 77.8%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.49
PTS 19
K. Huerter 33.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 9
D. Mitchell 32.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4
I. Quickley 28.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 10
C. Wallace 25.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
M. Bridges 24.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. McCullar Jr. 20.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2
S. Hauser 18.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

15
Games
17.9
PPG
2.0
RPG
8.0
APG
0.9
SPG
0.1
BPG
45.8
FG%
33.8
3P%
82.5
FT%
25.6
MPG