2025-26 Season

TONY BRADLEY

Atlanta Hawks | Center-Forward | 6-10

2025-26 Season

TONY BRADLEY

Atlanta Hawks | Center-Forward | 6-10 | Yr 7

4.0 PPG

2.9 RPG

0.6 APG

11.3 MPG

-4.5 Impact

Bradley produces at an below average rate for a 11-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

<iframe src="http://readthegame.com/embed/player/tony-bradley-1628396" width="100%" height="220" frameborder="0" style="border-radius:12px;max-width:500px;"></iframe>

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN

Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average

-4.5

Scoring +3.8

Points 4.0 PPG = +3.1

Shot Making above expected FG% = +0.7

Creation +0.3

Creation 0.6 AST/g = +0.3

Turnovers -1.2

Turnovers 0.5/g = -1.2

Defense -1.0

Defense 0.1 STL, 0.2 BLK = -1.0

Hustle & Effort +3.1

Rebounds 2.9 RPG = +3.1

Raw Impact +5.0

Baseline (game-average expected) −9.5

Net Impact

-4.5

12th pctl vs Centers

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

TEAM COMPARISON

Impact

Creation

Hustle

Defense

of 16 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)

Jalen Johnson +15.8 Nickeil Alexander-Walker +9.2 Dyson Daniels +7.6 CJ McCollum +7.6 Onyeka Okongwu +7.2 Kristaps Porziņģis +6.7 Jonathan Kuminga +3.7 Jock Landale -0.2 Luke Kennard -1.3 Zaccharie Risacher -1.7 Vít Krejčí -2.4 Asa Newell -2.7 Corey Kispert -3.1 Mouhamed Gueye -3.9 Keaton Wallace -6.1 Gabe Vincent -6.5

Similar Players

Same position, closest production profile this season.

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 93 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 16th

4.7 PPG

Efficiency 44th

58.1% TS

Playmaking 8th

0.6 APG

Rebounding 8th

3.3 RPG

Defense 8th

+2.4/g

Hustle 12th

+10.5/g

Creation 6th

+1.10/g

Shot Making 19th

+2.54/g

TO Discipline 83th

0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Tony Bradley’s first twenty games were defined by a frustrating tug-of-war between bruising offensive efficiency and glaring defensive limitations. When deployed carefully off the bench, he occasionally bullied opposing frontcourts. Look directly at 10/26 vs MIN, where he poured in 12 points and 5 rebounds to generate a massive +9.5 impact score through elite shot selection and dominant positioning around the rim. He even found ways to anchor lineups without demanding the basketball. On 10/29 vs DAL, Bradley posted a stellar +6.6 impact alongside a modest 6 points because his bone-rattling screen-setting and aggressive rim-running warped the defense. Then the starting lineup called, and everything collapsed. Despite shooting an efficient 4-for-6 for 8 points on 11/11 vs UTA, he registered a -2.4 impact. Opponents ruthlessly targeted him in the pick-and-roll, exploiting his heavy-footed drop coverage to erase any value his interior finishing provided.

Tony Bradley’s mid-season stretch was defined by erratic swings between being a sturdy defensive anchor and a complete offensive liability. During a brief nine-minute stint on Dec 13 vs PHI, he generated a massive +6.0 impact score despite scoring just two points. That stellar rating stemmed entirely from exceptional drop-coverage defense and elite rim protection. The magic rarely lasted. When his physical presence waned on Dec 31 vs ORL, he posted a dismal -7.1 impact score by missing his few interior looks and bleeding points at the rim. Even when handed a rare starting assignment on Apr 12 vs MIA, Bradley stumbled to a brutal -6.8 impact score. While he battled for five rebounds, his total inability to stretch the floor or anchor the paint dragged down the entire starting unit.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

Nov 18 | -14.5 impact

PATTERNS

Struggling. Bradley has posted negative impact in 85% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 64% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

In a rough stretch — 5 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 22 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 47 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.