MIL

2025-26 Season

THANASIS ANTETOKOUNMPO

Milwaukee Bucks | Forward | 6-7
Thanasis Antetokounmpo
1.4 PPG
0.9 RPG
0.4 APG
4.4 MPG
-7.5 Impact

Antetokounmpo produces at an poor rate for a 4-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-7.5
Scoring +1.0
Points 1.4 PPG = +0.9
Shot Making above expected FG% = +0.1
Creation +0.2
Creation 0.4 AST/g = +0.2
Turnovers -0.7
Turnovers 0.3/g = -0.7
Defense +0.5
Defense 0.4 STL, 0.2 BLK = +0.5
Hustle & Effort +0.6
Rebounds 0.9 RPG = +0.6
Raw Impact +1.6
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.1
Net Impact
-7.5
3th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

THE SEASON SO FAR

Thanasis Antetokounmpo's early season was defined entirely by micro-bursts of unbridled, chaotic energy at the end of the bench. He is a pure chaos agent. During a tiny three-minute window on 11/24 vs POR, he generated a massive +6.1 impact score despite scoring just three points. That analytical spike came entirely from his frantic defensive pressure, which rattled opposing ball handlers and yielded a +2.3 defensive rating. However, that same hyperactive motor often sabotaged his metrics. Look at his brief appearance on 01/21 vs OKC. He posted a dismal -2.2 impact score in just two minutes because his erratic energy translated into a wildly rushed, out-of-control missed three-pointer. Even when he actually found the basket for a season-high seven points on 12/06 vs DET, his +1.6 impact was driven by loose-ball dives rather than offensive polish.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Antetokounmpo has posted negative impact in 100% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Average defender. Antetokounmpo doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Flat trajectory all season — first-half impact -7.5, second-half -7.6. No major shifts, which fits with the overall steadiness.

In a rough stretch — 34 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 34 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 72 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

H. González 10.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. Koloko 7.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
L. Miller 7.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
R. Williams III 7.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Carter 6.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
G. Bitadze 6.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 2
T. Jemison III 6.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Ingles 6.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 2
S. Cissoko 6.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Garcia 6.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 2

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Carter 8.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
M. Diabaté 5.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
N. Penda 5.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.54
PTS 3
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Cain 5.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.38
PTS 2
H. González 5.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
R. Dillingham 4.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
L. Miller 4.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
E. Harkless 4.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.43
PTS 2
J. Ingles 4.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

34
Games
1.4
PPG
0.9
RPG
0.4
APG
0.4
SPG
0.2
BPG
46.9
FG%
0.0
3P%
56.7
FT%
4.4
MPG

GAME LOG

34 games played