MIA

2025-26 Season

SIMONE FONTECCHIO

Miami Heat | Forward | 6-7
Simone Fontecchio
8.4 PPG
3.0 RPG
1.4 APG
16.6 MPG
-3.7 Impact

Fontecchio produces at an below average rate for a 17-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-3.7
Scoring +7.4
Points 8.4 PPG = +5.3
Shot Making above expected FG% = +2.1
Creation +0.5
Creation 1.4 AST/g = +0.5
Turnovers -1.5
Turnovers 0.7/g = -1.5
Defense -0.2
Defense 0.5 STL, 0.1 BLK = -0.2
Hustle & Effort +2.4
Rebounds 3.0 RPG = +2.4
Raw Impact +8.6
Baseline (game-average expected) −12.3
Net Impact
-3.7
26th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 234 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 50th
9.2 PPG
Efficiency 32th
54.5% TS
Playmaking 48th
1.6 APG
Rebounding 29th
3.3 RPG
Defense 50th
+7.1/g
Hustle 33th
+10.2/g
Creation 20th
+1.56/g
Shot Making 60th
+6.63/g
TO Discipline 64th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Simone Fontecchio’s early season was defined by wild, unpredictable swings between lethal floor-spacing and self-destructive shot selection. When his jumper was falling, he looked like an elite weapon off the bench. During the 10/30 vs SAS matchup, his blistering 5-for-7 marksmanship from deep completely transformed the offensive geometry, driving a massive +4.2 impact score. Yet, even when he found the bottom of the net, hidden costs often dragged his rating into the red. He poured in 13 points on 11/12 vs CLE, but his overall impact dipped to -2.2 because poor transition defense completely negated his catch-and-shoot production. When the shot abandoned him entirely, he became an active detriment to the second unit. His performance on 11/21 vs CHI was a masterclass in how to stall an offense, as disastrous perimeter shot selection—including a brutal 1-for-10 from beyond the arc—cratered his rating to a team-worst -10.0 impact score.

Simone Fontecchio’s midseason stretch was defined by extreme volatility, oscillating wildly between lethal perimeter gravity and crippling defensive breakdowns. When his outside shot abandoned him, he became an active detriment. Look no further than the 01/08 vs CHI matchup, where a brutal sequence of forced jumpers and missed assignments saddled him with a disastrous -14.1 impact score. Even when the ball actually went through the net, hidden costs often ruined his overall value. During the 12/19 vs BOS contest, Fontecchio managed 12 points but still posted a dismal -9.0 impact score because his complete failure to contain penetration bled points on the other end. Thankfully, he occasionally found ways to be highly effective without dominating the box score. On 01/10 vs IND, he scored just 5 points but generated a stellar +4.6 impact score by providing disciplined weak-side rotations and immediate spacing gravity. Ultimately, he remains a classic boom-or-bust rotation piece whose margin for error completely disappears the moment his catch-and-shoot rhythm vanishes.

Wild, maddening inconsistency defined Simone Fontecchio’s midseason run, as he toggled violently between elite floor-spacer and offensive black hole. When his quick release was calibrated, he looked completely unstoppable. On 01/28 vs ORL, he operated as the ultimate zone-buster, catching fire from the perimeter to post 23 points and a massive +10.9 impact score. Even when the shots fell, however, his scoring totals often masked deeper flaws in his offensive diet. During 02/03 vs ATL, he dropped 18 points but managed a meager +0.1 impact score because a barrage of forced, contested three-pointers neutralized his overall value. Worse still, when the jumper abandoned him entirely, he rarely found other ways to contribute. His utter passivity on 01/25 vs PHX resulted in just a single point and a brutal -8.4 impact score, allowing defenders to freely sag off him and clog the paint.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Inconsistent. Fontecchio has clear good-night/bad-night splits, with scoring swinging ~6 points between games. You're never quite sure which version shows up.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 47% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Average defender. Fontecchio doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -5.3, second-half: -2.2. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 5 games. Longest cold streak: 15 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 76 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

T. da Silva 56.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 16
J. Clarkson 38.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 9
S. Hauser 37.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
M. Monk 33.8 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.24
PTS 8
L. Shamet 32.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.15
PTS 5
A. Dosunmu 32.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Durant 30.0 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 8
O. Agbaji 26.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
L. Dončić 23.7 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 5
B. Sensabaugh 22.7 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.22
PTS 5

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

T. da Silva 54.6 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 15
J. Clarkson 46.3 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 6
S. Hauser 40.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
I. Okoro 27.4 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 7
A. Dosunmu 26.3 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 8
A. Bailey 25.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
N. Clifford 25.0 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 4
O. Agbaji 24.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
L. Shamet 23.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.38
PTS 9
J. Phillips 22.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

71
Games
8.4
PPG
3.0
RPG
1.4
APG
0.5
SPG
0.1
BPG
41.1
FG%
37.4
3P%
84.3
FT%
16.6
MPG

GAME LOG

71 games played