BOS

2025-26 Season

SAM HAUSER

Boston Celtics | Forward | 6-7
Sam Hauser
9.2 PPG
3.8 RPG
1.5 APG
24.7 MPG
+0.2 Impact

Hauser produces at an average rate for a 25-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+0.2
Scoring +8.4
Points 9.2 PPG = +5.7
Shot Making above expected FG% = +2.7
Creation +0.2
Creation 1.5 AST/g = +0.2
Turnovers -1.1
Turnovers 0.4/g = -1.1
Defense -0.1
Defense 0.5 STL, 0.3 BLK = -0.1
Hustle & Effort +2.7
Rebounds 3.8 RPG = +2.7
Raw Impact +10.1
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.9
Net Impact
+0.2
54th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 234 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 51th
9.3 PPG
Efficiency 41th
55.5% TS
Playmaking 42th
1.5 APG
Rebounding 44th
3.9 RPG
Defense 24th
+5.2/g
Hustle 33th
+10.2/g
Creation 2th
+0.83/g
Shot Making 95th
+9.73/g
TO Discipline 98th
0.02/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Sam Hauser’s early season was defined by extreme, whiplash-inducing volatility. He swung wildly between acting as a lethal floor-spacing weapon and an outright offensive liability. When his perimeter mechanics broke down, the results were disastrous. A brutal shooting slump on 11/05 vs WAS completely neutralized his primary value, cratering his impact to a miserable -10.2 as defenders aggressively abandoned him on the perimeter. Even when his shot actually landed, hidden costs frequently dragged him down, like during the 11/23 vs ORL matchup where his 14 points resulted in a -6.3 impact due to severe defensive bleeding. Conversely, he occasionally found ways to generate massive value without filling the box score. During the 11/18 vs BKN game, he managed a stellar +7.8 impact despite scoring just 8 points because his phenomenal off-ball gravity and elite defensive rotations warped the opposing shell.

This volatile midseason stretch was defined by the feast-or-famine reality of relying on a pure perimeter specialist. When his shot fell, Hauser was a lethal weapon. He peaked on 12/26 vs IND with 23 points and a staggering +19.1 impact score, as his constant off-ball movement and immediate trigger off screens completely broke the opponent's defense. He occasionally found ways to contribute without high volume, like during the 12/02 vs NYK matchup where he scored just six points but still managed a +0.6 impact. Serving primarily as a floor-spacing decoy that night, he buoyed his overall value with surprisingly stout defense. But when the outside shot abandoned him, the floor fell out. On 01/07 vs DEN, an uncharacteristically quiet night from the perimeter completely neutralized his usual offensive gravity, dragging him down to a disastrous -11.5 impact score.

A crippling mid-season shooting slump turned Sam Hauser from a dangerous floor-spacer into an outright liability. Early in this stretch, he found ways to contribute without filling the bucket, posting a +4.3 impact score on 01/24 vs CHI despite scoring just 8 points by relying on steady defensive effort and positive hustle metrics. But the bottom quickly fell out on 02/01 vs MIL. Clanking a barrage of wide-open looks from deep completely derailed the half-court offense, resulting in just 3 points and a brutal -12.0 impact score. Even when his scoring briefly returned, hidden defensive costs kept him firmly in the red. He managed 13 points on 02/27 vs BKN, yet suffered a -5.2 impact score because opponents ruthlessly targeted his lateral quickness in isolation. When the three-ball refuses to drop, his lack of creation makes him too easy to ignore on one end and far too easy to hunt on the other.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Hauser's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 35% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Hauser locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -1.5, second-half: +1.8. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 10 games. Longest cold streak: 9 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 72 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

C. McCollum 79.2 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.23
PTS 18
J. Furphy 61.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 17
M. Porter Jr. 58.6 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 57.1%
PPP 0.26
PTS 15
T. Maxey 49.6 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 9
C. Kispert 43.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 9
D. Robinson 42.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 4
S. Fontecchio 40.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Green 39.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 9
T. da Silva 36.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 6
D. Mitchell 35.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Johnson 68.1 poss
FG% 29.4%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.19
PTS 13
M. Porter Jr. 53.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.43
PTS 23
K. Oubre Jr. 51.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 6
C. Flagg 43.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 12
S. Fontecchio 37.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Green 34.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
R. Barrett 32.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.31
PTS 10
O. Okongwu 32.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 9
J. Furphy 31.6 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 7
J. Harden 29.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 6

SEASON STATS

79
Games
9.2
PPG
3.8
RPG
1.5
APG
0.5
SPG
0.3
BPG
41.9
FG%
39.2
3P%
85.0
FT%
24.7
MPG

GAME LOG

79 games played