MIL

2025-26 Season

RYAN ROLLINS

Milwaukee Bucks | Guard | 6-3
Ryan Rollins
17.3 PPG
4.6 RPG
5.6 APG
32.1 MPG
+6.5 Impact

Rollins produces at an elite rate for a 32-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+6.5
Scoring +16.0
Points 17.3 PPG = +11.7
Shot Making above expected FG% = +4.3
Creation +1.3
Creation 5.6 AST/g = +1.3
Turnovers -6.3
Turnovers 2.7/g = -6.3
Defense +1.4
Defense 1.5 STL, 0.4 BLK = +1.4
Hustle & Effort +3.2
Rebounds 4.6 RPG = +3.2
Raw Impact +15.6
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.1
Net Impact
+6.5
83th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 245 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 84th
17.3 PPG
Efficiency 76th
58.0% TS
Playmaking 88th
5.6 APG
Rebounding 83th
4.6 RPG
Defense 74th
+9.5/g
Hustle 73th
+11.1/g
Creation 71th
+3.44/g
Shot Making 85th
+9.08/g
TO Discipline 17th
0.08/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Ryan Rollins spent the first twenty games of the season locked in a chaotic tug-of-war between brilliant offensive orchestration and deeply damaging shot selection. Early on, he found ways to win on the margins even when his jumper betrayed him. During the 10/24 vs TOR matchup, he managed a +6.0 impact score despite scoring just 13 points, shifting his value entirely to the defensive end to generate critical stops. However, as his usage spiked, a dangerous habit of high-volume gunning began to actively hurt the team. Look no further than his 11/17 vs CLE performance, where he dropped 24 points but registered a -2.5 impact because forced attempts in traffic severely depressed his overall effectiveness. A similar story unfolded on 11/26 vs MIA; his 26 points were a mirage that masked a brutally inefficient 11-for-24 shooting night, dragging him to a -1.4 impact. When he devolves into an isolation chucker, Rollins becomes his own team's worst enemy.

A maddening pendulum of offensive brilliance and self-destructive shot selection defined this turbulent stretch for Ryan Rollins. When he let the game come to him, he looked like a legitimate star. Look no further than his January 2 masterpiece (01/02 vs CHA), where he punished drop coverage with lethal precision to hang 29 points on 11-of-13 shooting, generating a massive +24.0 impact score. Yet, his worst habits routinely sabotaged his overall value. During the 12/31 vs WAS matchup, he managed a respectable 16 points, but his -8.0 impact score exposed the hidden costs of his performance, as forced, contested jumpers completely stalled the offensive engine. He hit absolute rock bottom shortly after in a 01/09 vs LAL tilt. A disastrous pattern of forced perimeter jumpers resulted in a 2-for-13 shooting night and a brutal -13.3 impact score. If Rollins wants to be a reliable floor general, he must learn that sheer volume cannot mask the steep price of poor offensive decision-making.

This stretch was a dizzying rollercoaster where elite offensive orchestration violently clashed with self-destructive shot selection. When Rollins lost his discipline, the hidden costs of his high-volume scoring actively harmed the team. Look no further than 02/03 vs CHI, where he tallied 21 points and 10 assists but posted a dismal -8.4 impact because his tunnel vision on drives led to forced layups that ignited opponent transition runs. Yet, he could suddenly flip the script into pure brilliance, like on 02/20 vs NOP when his catch-and-shoot mastery yielded an ultra-efficient 27 points and a massive +20.0 impact score. Even when his jumper completely abandoned him, Rollins occasionally found ways to stay above water through sheer grit. During the 03/04 vs ATL matchup, he shot a miserable 4-for-11 for just 13 points, but still salvaged a +2.7 impact by dictating the pace with exceptional playmaking and relentless hustle. He clearly possesses the tools to dominate, but his erratic decision-making makes him an agonizingly unpredictable asset.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Volatile for his role. Rollins has noticeable ups and downs, with scoring moving ~7 points between games.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 55% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Rollins consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Small downward trend. First-half impact: +7.5, second-half: +5.6. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 8 games. Longest cold streak: 4 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 73 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

I. Quickley 93.6 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.11
PTS 10
D. Daniels 75.8 poss
FG% 56.2%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.26
PTS 20
D. Schröder 68.8 poss
FG% 22.2%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 4
S. James 68.4 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 12
B. Carrington 60.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 4
D. Mitchell 60.6 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 8
T. Camara 59.8 poss
FG% 36.4%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.18
PTS 11
T. Maxey 55.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 15
J. Pickett 55.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 5
T. Jones 54.6 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 7

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

T. Maxey 110.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 30.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 23
I. Quickley 99.5 poss
FG% 52.2%
3P% 54.5%
PPP 0.35
PTS 35
C. McCollum 83.9 poss
FG% 61.1%
3P% 55.6%
PPP 0.39
PTS 33
FG% 62.5%
3P% 45.5%
PPP 0.31
PTS 25
J. Brunson 74.1 poss
FG% 64.7%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.42
PTS 31
D. Schröder 72.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 10
J. Giddey 71.6 poss
FG% 41.7%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.2
PTS 14
D. Mitchell 69.5 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 16.7%
PPP 0.24
PTS 17
J. Pickett 69.3 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 8
S. Curry 67.0 poss
FG% 43.8%
3P% 37.5%
PPP 0.3
PTS 20

SEASON STATS

74
Games
17.3
PPG
4.6
RPG
5.6
APG
1.5
SPG
0.4
BPG
47.2
FG%
40.6
3P%
79.6
FT%
32.1
MPG

GAME LOG

74 games played