PHX

2025-26 Season

RASHEER FLEMING

Phoenix Suns | Forward | 6-9
Rasheer Fleming
4.2 PPG
2.2 RPG
0.3 APG
12.0 MPG
-5.2 Impact

Fleming produces at an poor rate for a 12-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-5.2
Scoring +3.4
Points 4.2 PPG = +2.4
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.0
Creation +0.1
Creation 0.3 AST/g = +0.1
Turnovers -1.2
Turnovers 0.5/g = -1.2
Defense -0.3
Defense 0.4 STL, 0.4 BLK = -0.3
Hustle & Effort +2.2
Rebounds 2.2 RPG = +2.2
Raw Impact +4.2
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.4
Net Impact
-5.2
15th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 234 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 18th
5.5 PPG
Efficiency 17th
51.4% TS
Playmaking 1th
0.4 APG
Rebounding 17th
2.8 RPG
Defense 29th
+5.5/g
Hustle 24th
+8.9/g
Creation 3th
+0.96/g
Shot Making 37th
+4.84/g
TO Discipline 63th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Rasheer Fleming’s first twenty games of the season were defined by a maddeningly erratic battle for rotation minutes, swinging wildly between decisive rim-running and disastrous shot selection. Physicality was his only saving grace. During the 12/23 vs LAL matchup, he posted a stellar +6.0 impact score by aggressively attacking closeouts and finishing with authority to tally 7 points in just 10 minutes. However, even when he managed to score, poor decisions frequently dragged his overall value into the gutter. Look no further than the 12/27 vs NOP contest, where he scored 5 points but generated a catastrophic -8.1 impact score because he stubbornly settled for contested perimeter jumpers rather than attacking the paint. Defense offered a different story. Against the Rockets on 12/05 vs HOU, Fleming managed a +2.2 impact score despite scoring only 3 points on an abysmal 1-for-5 shooting performance. Elite rim protection and timely defensive rotations salvaged his value that night, revealing the gritty, blue-collar player he must become to survive in this league.

Rasheer Fleming’s midseason stretch was defined by extreme volatility as he desperately tried to graduate from mop-up duty into a reliable rotational floor-spacer. The growing pains were often brutal. This peaked during a disastrous 02/24 vs BOS matchup where he spent 21 agonizing minutes actively hurting his own squad. Getting bullied off his spots defensively compounded a completely barren zero-point offensive night, dragging him down to an abysmal -10.2 impact score. Yet, when his jumper actually fell, he transformed into a lethal weapon off the bench. On 03/08 vs CHA, he punished the defense from the trail spot by drilling four deep balls, racking up 16 points and a massive +10.1 impact score. He even managed to dominate without high volume on 03/13 vs TOR, where flawless 3-for-3 perimeter execution combined with suffocating defensive rotations fueled a stellar +9.9 impact score.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Fleming has posted negative impact in 82% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 45% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Average defender. Fleming doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -6.8, second-half: -3.5. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 2 games. Longest cold streak: 12 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 75 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

Z. Williamson 28.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
P. Nance 17.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 3
S. Cissoko 15.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Olynyk 15.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Slawson 14.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 2
B. Ingram 14.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Queen 14.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.36
PTS 5
B. Carrington 13.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Bal 13.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 2
L. Dončić 13.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 3

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

Z. Williamson 22.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 9
P. Pritchard 21.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 7
P. Nance 19.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 3
L. Dončić 15.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 4
S. Jones 15.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 2
S. Bey 15.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 2
K. Williams 14.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Carrington 13.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 2
R. Barrett 13.2 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 4
K. Chandler 12.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

56
Games
4.2
PPG
2.2
RPG
0.3
APG
0.4
SPG
0.4
BPG
40.5
FG%
34.6
3P%
55.9
FT%
12.0
MPG

GAME LOG

56 games played