CHA

2025-26 Season

PAT CONNAUGHTON

Charlotte Hornets | Guard | 6-5
Pat Connaughton
2.6 PPG
1.5 RPG
0.4 APG
7.0 MPG
-6.0 Impact

Connaughton produces at an poor rate for a 7-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-6.0
Scoring +2.5
Points 2.6 PPG = +1.8
Shot Making above expected FG% = +0.7
Creation +0.2
Creation 0.4 AST/g = +0.2
Turnovers -0.6
Turnovers 0.3/g = -0.6
Defense +0.4
Defense 0.3 STL, 0.0 BLK = +0.4
Hustle & Effort +1.1
Rebounds 1.5 RPG = +1.1
Raw Impact +3.6
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.6
Net Impact
-6.0
14th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 245 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 4th
4.0 PPG
Efficiency 43th
54.0% TS
Playmaking 1th
0.6 APG
Rebounding 26th
2.2 RPG
Defense 15th
+4.7/g
Hustle 16th
+5.4/g
Creation 15th
+1.60/g
Shot Making 10th
+3.76/g
TO Discipline 80th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Pat Connaughton’s early 2025-26 campaign was defined by a harsh reality: a relegation to the deep bench where he mostly served as a fleeting, unpredictable placeholder. Even when he managed to find the basket, hidden costs often ruined his minutes. On 11/02 vs UTA, he broke out of a severe scoring slump with 6 points in 14 minutes, yet suffered a dismal -5.3 impact score because glaring defensive vulnerabilities entirely negated his production. Conversely, he occasionally found the fountain of youth. He erupted during 11/19 vs IND, pouring in 13 points on 5-of-7 shooting to post a massive +7.3 impact by ruthlessly exploiting defensive breakdowns. He did not always need to fill the scoring column to swing a game, however. During a brief six-minute cameo on 01/18 vs DEN, Connaughton tallied just 3 points but generated a stellar +4.5 impact score by keeping the ball moving with 3 assists and providing a stout defensive lift.

Pat Connaughton’s mid-season stretch was defined by a desperate struggle to survive in a microscopic bench role. When given extended run on Feb 20 vs CLE, he tallied 5 points and 5 rebounds, but hitting a few timely shots couldn't mask the underlying damage of his floor time, resulting in a brutal -7.6 impact score. He similarly stalled the offense on Feb 24 vs CHI. Forcing up contested perimeter looks in that contest yielded an ugly -6.3 impact mark despite his 5 points. Yet, he occasionally found ways to contribute without scoring efficiently, like his shift on Mar 04 vs BOS. Despite clanking several wide-open corner looks to shoot a dismal 2-for-7, his relentless off-ball motion and veteran defensive rotations generated a stellar +4.5 impact. Ultimately, these fleeting moments of hustle couldn't hide the reality that his overall utility is fading, leaving him floating aimlessly through empty cardio shifts at the end of the rotation.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Connaughton has posted negative impact in 93% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 40% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Average defender. Connaughton doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Flat trajectory all season — first-half impact -5.6, second-half -6.4. No major shifts, which fits with the overall steadiness.

In a rough stretch — 14 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 17 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 62 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

K. Brown 18.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 5
B. Sheppard 12.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
P. Siakam 11.4 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.79
PTS 9
I. Joe 11.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Portis 10.9 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.64
PTS 7
D. McDermott 10.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Mitchell 10.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Walker 10.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
B. Scheierman 8.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
N. Penda 8.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

B. Portis 21.1 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.43
PTS 9
K. Brown 16.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 6
B. Sheppard 16.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 2
J. Tyson 10.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. Hendricks 10.0 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.4
PTS 4
B. Scheierman 9.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 2
D. McDermott 9.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
S. Bey 9.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.55
PTS 5
I. Joe 8.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 3
J. Walker 8.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

43
Games
2.6
PPG
1.5
RPG
0.4
APG
0.3
SPG
0.0
BPG
44.8
FG%
39.6
3P%
65.0
FT%
7.0
MPG

GAME LOG

43 games played