NYK

2025-26 Season

PACÔME DADIET

New York Knicks | Forward | 6-9
Pacôme Dadiet
1.7 PPG
0.9 RPG
0.4 APG
4.7 MPG
-7.0 Impact

Dadiet produces at an poor rate for a 5-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-7.0
Scoring +1.2
Points 1.7 PPG = +0.8
Shot Making above expected FG% = +0.4
Creation +0.1
Creation 0.4 AST/g = +0.1
Turnovers -0.2
Turnovers 0.1/g = -0.2
Defense +0.1
Defense 0.1 STL, 0.0 BLK = +0.1
Hustle & Effort +0.6
Rebounds 0.9 RPG = +0.6
Raw Impact +1.8
Baseline (game-average expected) −8.8
Net Impact
-7.0
4th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

THE SEASON SO FAR

Pacôme Dadiet spent the first twenty games of the season trapped in the purgatory of garbage-time cardio. For weeks, he simply floated around the perimeter, rarely logging enough minutes to break a sweat before the final buzzer sounded. When he finally received an extended look on 12/23 vs MIN, the results were disastrous. He bled value across 11 scoreless minutes, posting a brutal -7.0 impact score driven entirely by blown defensive assignments and empty offensive possessions. Yet, he occasionally found ways to contribute without filling up the stat sheet. During a brief four-minute stint on 12/18 vs IND, Dadiet recorded a +2.1 impact despite scoring zero points because he locked in on defensive positioning and high-energy hustle plays. His raw scoring potential only truly erupted on 03/06 vs DEN, where he unleashed a lethal perimeter barrage to hit all three of his deep attempts, racking up 11 points and a +6.8 impact score that genuinely shifted the game's momentum.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Dadiet has posted negative impact in 90% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -8.1, second-half: -5.9. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 1 games. Longest cold streak: 18 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 55 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

L. Miller 11.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Huerter 10.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.49
PTS 5
Z. Nnaji 9.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.53
PTS 5
J. Walker 8.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 2
T. Martin 7.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Edwards 7.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Brown 6.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 2
J. Wilson 5.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. Lanier 4.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.41
PTS 2
M. Sasser 4.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

L. Miller 10.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 2
D. Holmes II 9.0 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 3
J. Walker 7.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Wilson 7.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Brown 6.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 2
T. Martin 6.0 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 2
D. DiVincenzo 5.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
M. Sasser 5.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Huerter 5.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. Lanier 5.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

29
Games
1.7
PPG
0.9
RPG
0.4
APG
0.1
SPG
0.0
BPG
33.3
FG%
21.9
3P%
81.8
FT%
4.7
MPG

GAME LOG

29 games played