MEM

2025-26 Season

OLIVIER-MAXENCE PROSPER

Memphis Grizzlies | Forward | 6-7
Olivier-Maxence Prosper
9.8 PPG
3.5 RPG
0.9 APG
18.3 MPG
+0.6 Impact

Prosper produces at an average rate for a 18-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+0.6
Scoring +9.4
Points 9.8 PPG = +7.5
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.9
Creation +0.6
Creation 0.9 AST/g = +0.6
Turnovers -2.2
Turnovers 0.9/g = -2.2
Defense +0.2
Defense 0.7 STL, 0.2 BLK = +0.2
Hustle & Effort +3.0
Rebounds 3.5 RPG = +3.0
Raw Impact +11.0
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.4
Net Impact
+0.6
56th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 234 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 63th
11.4 PPG
Efficiency 97th
67.5% TS
Playmaking 25th
1.1 APG
Rebounding 46th
3.9 RPG
Defense 66th
+7.9/g
Hustle 43th
+11.4/g
Creation 48th
+2.33/g
Shot Making 74th
+7.47/g
TO Discipline 47th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Prosper's first twenty games were defined by maddening inconsistency, oscillating wildly between disruptive defensive shifts and stretches where mental lapses actively hurt his squad. On 11/02 vs TOR, he scored just 6 points but generated a stellar +4.9 impact score by blowing up multiple dribble hand-offs on the perimeter. Conversely, his focus entirely vanished on 12/22 vs OKC. Despite shooting an efficient 3-for-5 from the floor, missed rotations and glaring defensive lapses dragged him down to a brutal -7.5 impact mark. He finally put all the pieces together when thrust into the starting lineup on 01/25 vs DEN. Pouring in 19 points on just nine shots, Prosper paired elite shot selection with suffocating defense to post a massive +7.5 impact score. When engaged, he looks like a legitimate weapon.

Olivier-Maxence Prosper spent this twenty-game stretch riding a chaotic pendulum between ruthless two-way efficiency and baffling mental lapses. When he fully committed to his defensive assignments and decisive cuts, he was an absolute wrecking ball on the floor. During the 02/27 vs DAL matchup, he paired 16 points with 10 rebounds to generate a massive +16.4 impact, driven entirely by his suffocating defensive presence against the opposing wings. Even when his shot volume dropped to just 9 points on 02/21 vs MIA, he still managed a +6.6 impact by maximizing his playmaking and defensive utility to elevate the starting unit. Yet, his value cratered the moment he lost focus. Despite an efficient 15 points on 03/09 vs BKN, careless ball security and live-ball turnovers tanked his impact to a dismal -7.4. Ultimately, he dictates his own worth through hustle and discipline rather than raw scoring totals.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Prosper's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~7 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 69% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Prosper locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -3.9, second-half: +5.1. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 6 games. Longest cold streak: 13 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 58 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

D. Clingan 53.9 poss
FG% 38.9%
3P% 54.5%
PPP 0.45
PTS 24
D. Gafford 44.8 poss
FG% 36.4%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.22
PTS 10
R. Gobert 42.3 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 9
M. Raynaud 36.8 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 6
L. Garza 31.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 8
N. Jokić 28.8 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.17
PTS 5
J. Randle 24.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Duren 24.2 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.45
PTS 11
R. Williams III 23.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Huff 22.4 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.4
PTS 9

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

D. Clingan 66.8 poss
FG% 68.8%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.37
PTS 25
D. Gafford 57.4 poss
FG% 88.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 16
N. Jokić 47.4 poss
FG% 54.5%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 16
R. Gobert 38.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
M. Raynaud 36.4 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
J. Randle 34.6 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.4
PTS 14
N. Reid 31.5 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 4
L. Garza 30.9 poss
FG% 83.3%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 11
Z. Williamson 30.8 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 12
J. Duren 27.1 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.52
PTS 14

SEASON STATS

54
Games
9.8
PPG
3.5
RPG
0.9
APG
0.7
SPG
0.2
BPG
54.9
FG%
40.5
3P%
75.4
FT%
18.3
MPG

GAME LOG

54 games played