MIA

2025-26 Season

MYRON GARDNER

Miami Heat | Forward | 6-5
Myron Gardner
3.6 PPG
2.7 RPG
1.0 APG
9.1 MPG
-5.1 Impact

Gardner produces at an poor rate for a 9-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-5.1
Scoring +3.5
Points 3.6 PPG = +2.6
Shot Making above expected FG% = +0.9
Creation +0.3
Creation 1.0 AST/g = +0.3
Turnovers -0.9
Turnovers 0.4/g = -0.9
Defense -0.4
Defense 0.4 STL, 0.2 BLK = -0.4
Hustle & Effort +2.7
Rebounds 2.7 RPG = +2.7
Raw Impact +5.2
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.3
Net Impact
-5.1
16th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 234 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 18th
5.5 PPG
Efficiency 76th
60.3% TS
Playmaking 49th
1.6 APG
Rebounding 53th
4.3 RPG
Defense 9th
+4.1/g
Hustle 64th
+14.0/g
Creation 10th
+1.27/g
Shot Making 16th
+3.14/g
TO Discipline 75th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Myron Gardner's early season was defined by wild, unpredictable swings between hyper-efficient spot starts and disastrous bench cameos. When thrust into the starting lineup on 01/30 vs CHI, he was an absolute wrecking ball. He posted a +9.2 impact score fueled by relentless work on the offensive glass and a 12-point, 11-rebound double-double. Yet, just two days later on 02/01 vs CHI, Gardner returned to the bench and became an outright liability. Despite grabbing seven rebounds, his inability to stay in front of quicker wings led to a barrage of straight-line drives that tanked his impact to a brutal -8.0. Offense isn't always required for him to leave a mark, though. During a chaotic three-minute blip on 12/29 vs DEN, he bricked all three of his shot attempts but still managed a +2.2 impact by playing ferocious defense. He remains a volatile fringe piece, capable of swinging a quarter with pure hustle or derailing a rotation with rushed decisions.

This stretch was defined by Gardner's erratic oscillation between highly disruptive spot-starter and unplayable bench afterthought. When given the starting nod on Feb 03 vs ATL, he responded with a massive +10.2 impact score. That stellar rating stemmed directly from his relentless energy on 50/50 balls and suffocating perimeter defense, rather than just his 14 points. Conversely, his reserve minutes often bled value due to brutal defensive inattentiveness. During a Mar 21 vs HOU matchup, he shot a highly efficient 3-for-4 from the floor for 8 points, yet posted a dismal -6.6 impact score because severe defensive lapses completely undercut his scoring. Even when he hit the glass hard as a starter on Mar 08 vs DET, grabbing 6 rebounds, a barrage of perimeter breakdowns dragged his overall impact down to -5.3. Gardner simply cannot survive in a modern rotation if his defensive engagement vanishes the moment his role fluctuates.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Gardner has posted negative impact in 84% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 22% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Performance has dropped off. First-half impact: -3.1, second-half: -7.1. Worth watching whether it's fatigue, injury, or opponents adjusting.

In a rough stretch — 6 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 13 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 57 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

B. Coulibaly 29.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
A. Dosunmu 19.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 3
T. Murphy III 16.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
Z. Risacher 16.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 5
P. Williams 16.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. Harris 15.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Phillips 13.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
I. Okoro 13.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.52
PTS 7
W. Riley 13.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 2
K. Knueppel 12.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 3

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

B. Coulibaly 28.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 6
A. Dosunmu 24.1 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.25
PTS 6
T. Murphy III 23.5 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 7
M. Bridges 17.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2
W. Riley 16.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 3
J. Phillips 16.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 2
M. Buzelis 13.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 2
T. Harris 12.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.4
PTS 5
T. Johnson 12.2 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 4
B. McGowens 11.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 3

SEASON STATS

45
Games
3.6
PPG
2.7
RPG
1.0
APG
0.4
SPG
0.2
BPG
48.0
FG%
40.6
3P%
73.1
FT%
9.1
MPG

GAME LOG

45 games played