CLE

2025-26 Season

MAX STRUS

Cleveland Cavaliers | Guard-Forward | 6-5
Max Strus
12.0 PPG
4.9 RPG
1.7 APG
24.3 MPG
+0.1 Impact

Strus produces at an average rate for a 24-minute workload. Defensive impact (-2.0/game) is a concern.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+0.1
Scoring +11.3
Points 12.0 PPG = +8.1
Shot Making above expected FG% = +3.2
Creation +0.8
Creation 1.7 AST/g = +0.8
Turnovers -2.0
Turnovers 0.9/g = -2.0
Defense -2.0
Defense 0.3 STL, 0.1 BLK = -2.0
Hustle & Effort +3.6
Rebounds 4.9 RPG = +3.6
Raw Impact +11.7
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.6
Net Impact
+0.1
61st pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 245 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 63th
12.0 PPG
Efficiency 74th
57.9% TS
Playmaking 28th
1.7 APG
Rebounding 88th
4.9 RPG
Defense 10th
+4.4/g
Hustle 53th
+9.2/g
Creation 22th
+1.89/g
Shot Making 74th
+8.15/g
TO Discipline 81th
0.04/min

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Strus's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~9 points per game.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 36% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Defensive impact is minimal for a 24-minute player. Not generating enough contests, rim protection, or forced turnovers to move the needle.

Performance has dropped off. First-half impact: +3.0, second-half: -2.7. Worth watching whether it's fatigue, injury, or opponents adjusting.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 8 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

B. Podziemski 21.7 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 7
L. Dončić 16.8 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.18
PTS 3
T. da Silva 14.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
M. Buzelis 11.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Green 11.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Poulakidas 10.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.84
PTS 9
J. Jaquez Jr. 10.3 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.68
PTS 7
K. Middleton 9.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.52
PTS 5
J. Howard 9.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
G. Yabusele 9.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

L. Dončić 26.6 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.56
PTS 15
B. Podziemski 22.4 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.49
PTS 11
P. Banchero 16.1 poss
FG% 71.4%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.87
PTS 14
G. Yabusele 12.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.41
PTS 5
O. Dieng 11.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 3
M. Buzelis 10.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.28
PTS 3
T. da Silva 10.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.48
PTS 5
Z. Williamson 9.9 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.51
PTS 5
D. Queen 9.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 2
P. Williams 9.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

14
Games
12.0
PPG
4.9
RPG
1.7
APG
0.3
SPG
0.1
BPG
47.2
FG%
40.4
3P%
80.0
FT%
24.3
MPG