CLE

2025-26 Season

LUKE TRAVERS

Cleveland Cavaliers | Forward | 6-6
Luke Travers
2.3 PPG
2.0 RPG
0.8 APG
8.6 MPG
-5.8 Impact

Travers produces at an poor rate for a 9-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-5.8
Scoring +0.9
Points 2.3 PPG = +0.6
Shot Making above expected FG% = +0.3
Creation +0.4
Creation 0.8 AST/g = +0.4
Turnovers -0.7
Turnovers 0.2/g = -0.7
Defense +1.2
Defense 0.6 STL, 0.3 BLK = +1.2
Hustle & Effort +1.7
Rebounds 2.0 RPG = +1.7
Raw Impact +3.5
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.3
Net Impact
-5.8
11th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 234 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 3th
2.8 PPG
Efficiency 1th
38.7% TS
Playmaking 17th
0.9 APG
Rebounding 12th
2.4 RPG
Defense 12th
+4.4/g
Hustle 5th
+5.4/g
Creation 17th
+1.51/g
Shot Making 1th
+0.92/g
TO Discipline 87th
0.03/min

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Travers has posted negative impact in 100% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Travers locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Flat trajectory all season — first-half impact -5.2, second-half -6.3. No major shifts, which fits with the overall steadiness.

In a rough stretch — 12 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 12 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 19 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. Battle 11.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 2
C. Lanier 9.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
S. Fontecchio 8.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.47
PTS 4
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Sanders 7.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
G. Dick 7.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.42
PTS 3
B. Ingram 6.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. Paul 6.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Johnson 6.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.66
PTS 4
G. Mathews 5.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

W. Riley 12.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
G. Dick 10.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 2
J. Battle 10.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 3
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.6
PTS 5
C. Lanier 8.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
N. Batum 6.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
L. Waters III 6.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Wiggins 5.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
P. Larsson 5.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. Paul 5.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

12
Games
2.3
PPG
2.0
RPG
0.8
APG
0.6
SPG
0.3
BPG
25.0
FG%
6.2
3P%
100.0
FT%
8.6
MPG