IND

2025-26 Season

KOBE BROWN

Indiana Pacers | Forward | 6-7
Kobe Brown
5.8 PPG
3.0 RPG
1.3 APG
15.8 MPG
-4.6 Impact

Brown produces at an below average rate for a 16-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-4.6
Scoring +5.4
Points 5.8 PPG = +4.1
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.3
Creation +0.6
Creation 1.3 AST/g = +0.6
Turnovers -2.2
Turnovers 0.9/g = -2.2
Defense -0.2
Defense 0.4 STL, 0.2 BLK = -0.2
Hustle & Effort +3.2
Rebounds 3.0 RPG = +3.2
Raw Impact +6.8
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.4
Net Impact
-4.6
19th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 234 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 33th
7.1 PPG
Efficiency 63th
58.4% TS
Playmaking 46th
1.5 APG
Rebounding 41th
3.7 RPG
Defense 50th
+7.1/g
Hustle 43th
+11.4/g
Creation 75th
+3.31/g
Shot Making 42th
+5.27/g
TO Discipline 34th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Kobe Brown's opening stretch of the season was defined by maddening inconsistency and a desperate search for a stable rotation role. He bounced wildly between highly efficient cameos and total invisibility. Look no further than his 11/25 vs LAL appearance. Despite shooting an efficient 3-for-4 from the floor to tally 6 points in 21 minutes, Brown posted a dismal -7.1 impact score because a complete lack of hustle plays and negative defensive effort cratered his overall value. Conversely, he found ways to contribute without shooting the lights out during a brief stint on 10/22 vs UTA. Scoring just 2 points in four minutes, he generated a +3.0 impact score by acting as a brilliant offensive connector who facilitated seamless ball reversals. He finally put the whole package together on 12/05 vs MEM, pouring in 13 points in 21 minutes to earn a massive +8.7 impact score. That peak performance was fueled by elite defensive positioning and a relentless motor, revealing exactly what kind of two-way spark plug he can be when fully engaged.

This stretch was defined by a frustrating paradox where an increase in playing time and raw production actively harmed his team on the floor. Look at his 02/19 vs WAS outing, where he tallied 12 points and 9 rebounds in 33 minutes but still posted a dismal -3.8 impact score. Those counting numbers were entirely undone by hidden costs, as poor transition defense allowed Washington to run wild on the other end. The floor completely caved in on 02/24 vs PHI, where he tallied 9 points and 10 rebounds but generated a brutal -11.6 impact score by forcing contested looks early in the shot clock. Ironically, Brown was often much more helpful when he barely shot the ball at all. During a brief 7-minute appearance on 01/25 vs BKN, he managed a +1.2 impact score with just 2 points. He generated that positive value entirely through active hands and physical on-ball defense to set a rugged tone. When he embraced the gritty margins, he helped the rotation; when he forced his own offense, the entire lineup suffered.

Kobe Brown spent this stretch trapped in a maddening cycle of extreme offensive passivity and hidden defensive lapses. Even when his raw production looked respectable, hidden costs tanked his value. Look no further than the Mar 17 vs NYK matchup, where he managed 13 points but posted a disastrous -15.2 impact score because severe defensive rotation errors and poor transition balance bled points the other way. He occasionally flipped the script by doing the dirty work, as seen on Mar 27 vs LAC. Despite scoring just 11 points, he dominated the margins with relentless energy to secure loose balls, driving a stellar +12.7 impact score. Sadly, those high-motor flashes were quickly erased by nights like Apr 07 vs MIN, where a drastic drop in scoring aggression yielded just 2 points and a -10.1 impact score. Until he stops letting off-ball laziness and offensive hesitation dictate his nights, his minutes will remain a serious liability.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Brown has posted negative impact in 80% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 48% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -6.8, second-half: -2.4. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 5 games. Longest cold streak: 18 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 73 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

O. Anunoby 38.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.13
PTS 5
J. Jackson Jr. 34.0 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.29
PTS 10
K. Richmond 29.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 3
A. Williams 25.3 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.43
PTS 11
B. Coulibaly 24.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
M. Diawara 24.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
L. Ball 23.2 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
J. Miller 22.9 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
J. Landale 20.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 1
J. Jaquez Jr. 20.2 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 7

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

O. Anunoby 47.3 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.25
PTS 12
M. Diawara 38.6 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
J. Jaquez Jr. 33.9 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.29
PTS 10
J. Jackson Jr. 30.7 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.29
PTS 9
K. Richmond 29.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Knueppel 25.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 5
M. Bridges 23.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
J. Miller 23.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
A. Williams 23.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
R. Rupert 21.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 4

SEASON STATS

61
Games
5.8
PPG
3.0
RPG
1.3
APG
0.4
SPG
0.2
BPG
46.9
FG%
37.4
3P%
79.7
FT%
15.8
MPG

GAME LOG

61 games played