MEM

2025-26 Season

KENTAVIOUS CALDWELL-POPE

Memphis Grizzlies | Guard | 6-5
Kentavious Caldwell-Pope
8.4 PPG
2.5 RPG
2.7 APG
21.3 MPG
-3.2 Impact

Caldwell-Pope produces at an below average rate for a 21-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-3.2
Scoring +7.1
Points 8.4 PPG = +5.2
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.9
Creation +0.7
Creation 2.7 AST/g = +0.7
Turnovers -2.8
Turnovers 1.2/g = -2.8
Defense +0.9
Defense 0.8 STL, 0.2 BLK = +0.9
Hustle & Effort +1.3
Rebounds 2.5 RPG = +1.3
Raw Impact +7.2
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.4
Net Impact
-3.2
38th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 245 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 40th
8.4 PPG
Efficiency 37th
52.9% TS
Playmaking 53th
2.7 APG
Rebounding 35th
2.5 RPG
Defense 47th
+7.1/g
Hustle 12th
+5.1/g
Creation 54th
+2.93/g
Shot Making 26th
+4.91/g
TO Discipline 50th
0.06/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

A brutal, extended shooting slump and a subsequent demotion to the bench defined Kentavious Caldwell-Pope's first twenty games. He often hurt the team most when he was actually putting the ball in the basket. During his 10/22 vs NOP appearance, he scored a season-high 15 points but posted a dismal -9.8 impact score because his disastrous 2-for-7 perimeter shooting completely tanked the halfcourt offense. Conversely, he occasionally found ways to be a positive force without scoring, like on 11/11 vs NYK. Despite tallying just 4 points, he managed a +0.9 impact score by anchoring the floor with elite defensive engagement and active hustle. Those bright spots were exceedingly rare.

Wild inconsistency defined this turbulent stretch off the bench for Kentavious Caldwell-Pope, who violently swung between elite two-way execution and total offensive disappearance. His value plummeted when his shot selection deteriorated, perfectly captured on 12/17 vs MIN. Despite scoring 12 points, he posted a dreadful -8.8 impact score because clanking a high volume of contested looks actively sabotaged the team's offensive efficiency. Conversely, he could still swing games without filling the scoring column. During the 12/05 vs LAC matchup, Caldwell-Pope managed just 5 points but logged a +1.5 impact by relying entirely on connective passing and mistake-free basketball. When fully engaged, his ceiling remains dangerously high. He torched the nets on 01/02 vs LAL, pouring in 20 points for a massive +10.7 impact fueled by blistering perimeter efficiency and relentless off-ball movement. Ultimately, he is a volatile luxury whose passive outings carry severe hidden costs.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Inconsistent. Caldwell-Pope has clear good-night/bad-night splits, with scoring swinging ~5 points between games. You're never quite sure which version shows up.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 39% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Average defender. Caldwell-Pope doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 2 games. Longest cold streak: 6 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 51 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

T. Murphy III 40.2 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
J. Smith Jr. 36.8 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
A. Mitchell 35.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
J. LaRavia 29.2 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 10
Z. LaVine 28.5 poss
FG% 16.7%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 3
C. McCollum 27.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
T. Hardaway Jr. 26.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
D. DiVincenzo 24.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
J. Champagnie 22.0 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
S. Bey 21.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.23
PTS 5

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Smith Jr. 46.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 9
S. Bey 43.5 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 15
T. Murphy III 41.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 13
A. Mitchell 41.9 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 12
T. Hardaway Jr. 39.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
D. DiVincenzo 35.7 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.17
PTS 6
L. Dončić 35.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.46
PTS 16
Z. LaVine 32.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 12
B. Sensabaugh 30.8 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 3
K. Johnson 30.8 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 4

SEASON STATS

51
Games
8.4
PPG
2.5
RPG
2.7
APG
0.8
SPG
0.2
BPG
41.0
FG%
31.6
3P%
91.2
FT%
21.3
MPG

GAME LOG

51 games played