NOP

2025-26 Season

KARLO MATKOVIĆ

New Orleans Pelicans | Forward-Center | 6-10
Karlo Matković
5.7 PPG
3.7 RPG
0.8 APG
14.7 MPG
-4.4 Impact

Matković produces at an below average rate for a 15-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-4.4
Scoring +5.3
Points 5.7 PPG = +4.3
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.0
Creation +0.2
Creation 0.8 AST/g = +0.2
Turnovers -1.4
Turnovers 0.5/g = -1.4
Defense -0.5
Defense 0.4 STL, 0.9 BLK = -0.5
Hustle & Effort +3.2
Rebounds 3.7 RPG = +3.2
Raw Impact +6.8
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.2
Net Impact
-4.4
22th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 234 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 24th
6.0 PPG
Efficiency 100th
74.3% TS
Playmaking 14th
0.9 APG
Rebounding 45th
3.9 RPG
Defense 10th
+4.2/g
Hustle 43th
+11.4/g
Creation 55th
+2.50/g
Shot Making 12th
+2.79/g
TO Discipline 73th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Karlo Matković’s first twenty games were defined by extreme volatility as a fringe rotation big, swinging wildly between hyper-efficient sparkplug and unplayable liability. When he embraced his role, the results were staggering. Look at his performance on 11/04 vs CHA, where elite rim-running and decisive pick-and-roll finishing yielded 13 points and a massive +10.6 impact score. He could even swing a game without looking at the basket. On 11/16 vs GSW, Matković scored just 4 points in 20 minutes but still posted a +2.4 impact score by sacrificing offensive touches to anchor the defense and provide elite rim protection. However, severe hidden costs often erased his value on off nights.

Karlo Matković spent this twenty-game stretch as a highly volatile bench piece, swinging wildly between surgical interior dominance and costly mental errors. He opened the window scorching hot during the 01/02 vs POR matchup, turning 7-of-8 shooting into 16 points and a massive +14.3 impact score. Even when his offense vanished, he still found ways to alter games through sheer hustle and rim protection. During the 01/31 vs PHI contest, he scored just 2 points but still posted a +5.3 impact by acting as an absolute terror on defense and completely shutting down the interior. Yet, that defensive discipline frequently disappeared on other nights. Despite tallying a respectable 7 points in the 02/04 vs MIL game, his overall impact sank to -1.4. Careless moving screens and a bad habit of biting on perimeter fakes completely erased the value of his interior finishing.

This stretch was defined by a masterclass in hyper-efficient, low-usage role-playing that eventually ran out of gas. Matković routinely generated massive value without demanding the basketball. On 02/28 vs UTA, he scored just 8 points but posted a stellar +8.6 impact by suffocating opponents with defensive dominance and active passing. He reached his absolute peak on 03/16 vs DAL. By stepping out to bury pick-and-pop jumpers, he completely altered the floor's geometry, yielding 13 points, 10 rebounds, and a staggering +14.4 impact score. That flawless execution eventually vanished. During a brutal outing on 03/19 vs LAC, he bricked all six of his field goal attempts. Being an absolute zero on the offensive end severely punished his team, resulting in a dismal -5.5 impact despite respectable hustle metrics.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Inconsistent. Matković has clear good-night/bad-night splits, with scoring swinging ~4 points between games. You're never quite sure which version shows up.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 65% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Matković consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -6.1, second-half: -2.8. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 3 games. Longest cold streak: 6 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 65 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

O. Ighodaro 28.8 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 10
K. Durant 25.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 3
J. Collins 23.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 3
Q. Post 22.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 7
J. Konchar 21.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 4
I. Jackson 21.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
G. Jackson 21.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 3
B. Lopez 20.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Eubanks 20.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 3
P. Banchero 19.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

B. Lopez 29.6 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 4
K. Filipowski 26.9 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 6
O. Ighodaro 25.1 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 6
M. Raynaud 21.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 4
D. Eubanks 21.7 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Collins 21.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.42
PTS 9
J. Hayes 19.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
A. Bona 19.8 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 6
N. Reid 19.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.46
PTS 9
J. Konchar 19.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

SEASON STATS

62
Games
5.7
PPG
3.7
RPG
0.8
APG
0.4
SPG
0.9
BPG
60.4
FG%
42.2
3P%
73.2
FT%
14.7
MPG

GAME LOG

62 games played