NOP

2025-26 Season

JEREMIAH FEARS

New Orleans Pelicans | Guard | 6-3
Jeremiah Fears
14.3 PPG
3.7 RPG
3.4 APG
25.8 MPG
-0.4 Impact

Fears produces at an average rate for a 26-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-0.4
Scoring +11.6
Points 14.3 PPG = +8.7
Shot Making above expected FG% = +2.9
Creation +1.4
Creation 3.4 AST/g = +1.4
Turnovers -5.2
Turnovers 2.2/g = -5.2
Defense +1.6
Defense 1.2 STL, 0.4 BLK = +1.6
Hustle & Effort +2.5
Rebounds 3.7 RPG = +2.5
Raw Impact +11.9
Baseline (game-average expected) −12.3
Net Impact
-0.4
58th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 245 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 74th
14.3 PPG
Efficiency 28th
51.3% TS
Playmaking 63th
3.4 APG
Rebounding 69th
3.7 RPG
Defense 99th
+15.0/g
Hustle 72th
+10.8/g
Creation 86th
+4.32/g
Shot Making 70th
+7.78/g
TO Discipline 17th
0.08/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Jeremiah Fears spent his first twenty games riding a chaotic pendulum between disruptive two-way menace and inefficient volume shooter. When he embraced the gritty margins of the game, his value spiked regardless of his scoring totals. Take his 10/31 vs LAC performance as a prime example. Despite an ugly 4-for-14 shooting night yielding just 13 points, he posted a +8.0 impact score because his relentless energy (+7.0 hustle) and defensive tenacity completely wrecked the opposition's flow. Conversely, his shot selection frequently sabotaged his overall effectiveness even when his point totals looked respectable. During an outing on 11/02 vs OKC, he dropped 16 points but recorded a brutal -10.0 impact score, bleeding value through live-ball turnovers and awful decision-making that ignited opponent fast breaks. He hit absolute rock bottom on 10/27 vs BOS, where an abysmal 1-for-11 shooting night yielded just 2 points and a disastrous -19.3 impact score driven by forced, low-percentage jumpers. To survive as a reliable starter, Fears must stop hunting empty stats and commit to the point-of-attack defense that actually drives winning basketball.

A disastrous regression into tunnel vision and forced offense completely derailed Jeremiah Fears during this brutal winter stretch. Even when his raw scoring totals looked respectable, hidden costs routinely bled his team dry. During the 01/02 vs POR matchup, Fears tallied 18 points but posted a dismal -11.7 impact score because his failure to stretch the floor severely cramped the halfcourt offense. Similarly, his 20-point outing on 12/04 vs MIN yielded a negative -1.5 impact, as empty-calorie production masked a slew of hidden mistakes. He only managed to stay afloat when he fully committed to the gritty margins of the floor. On 12/22 vs DAL, Fears scored just 12 points on a miserable 4-for-14 shooting night, yet still scraped out a +2.1 impact by relying on tenacious on-ball defense and active hands to disrupt the opponent. If Fears wants to be a winning player, he must abandon the disastrous decision-making that currently poisons his offensive profile.

A mid-season demotion to the second unit defined this volatile stretch, turning Jeremiah Fears into a chaotic rotation piece whose shot selection constantly swung his value. When he embraced his role as a defensive pest, he found ways to tilt the floor without filling up the scoring column. During 02/02 vs CHA, Fears managed just 9 points but generated a robust +6.0 impact by utilizing active hands in passing lanes and applying disciplined on-ball pressure. Too often, though, his worst habits surfaced. Look no further than 02/28 vs UTA, where a hefty box score of 18 points, 11 rebounds, and 5 assists masked a damaging -5.8 impact because chilly perimeter shooting and forced attempts completely dragged down his efficiency. He finally found his rhythm during 03/01 vs LAC. Scorching the nets for 28 points, Fears broke the opposing zone and secured a +5.6 impact to end the stretch on a brilliant high note.

Wild inconsistency and a constant tug-of-war between shot volume and actual value defined Jeremiah Fears’s late-season stretch. Too often, his respectable scoring totals masked underlying inefficiencies that actively hurt his team on the floor. During his Feb 28 vs UTA appearance, he stuffed the box score with 18 points and 11 rebounds but posted a dismal -5.4 impact score because of forced attempts and chilly 5-for-14 shooting. Similarly, on Mar 16 vs DAL, he dropped 17 points but dragged his impact down to -2.3 due to costly defensive miscommunications and poor closeouts that gave points right back. Yet, when he reined in his worst habits, he looked like an entirely different weapon. He capped off this run on Apr 07 vs UTA with an absolute masterpiece, erupting for 40 points on 17-for-29 shooting. That sheer isolation dominance systematically dismantled the defense and generated a massive +16.2 impact score, highlighting his immense ceiling when he finally plays under control.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Fears's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~7 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 41% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Fears consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Hot right now — 6 straight games with positive impact. Longest positive run this season: 6 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 77 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

D. DiVincenzo 54.1 poss
FG% 46.2%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 18
T. Jones 52.5 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 11
A. Reaves 47.0 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 12
B. Williams 45.8 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 6
D. Carter 43.8 poss
FG% 85.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 14
FG% 55.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 12
T. Camara 41.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 10
D. Garland 40.4 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 7
M. Smart 39.7 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 14
D. Jenkins 39.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 10

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

D. DiVincenzo 55.1 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 14.3%
PPP 0.11
PTS 6
M. Smart 49.2 poss
FG% 41.7%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 12
S. Sharpe 47.5 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.57
PTS 27
D. Carter 45.0 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 10
S. Castle 43.3 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 8
M. Christie 43.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 15
C. Wallace 42.1 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 8
D. Garland 39.2 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 7
V. Williams Jr. 38.4 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.26
PTS 10
C. Johnson 38.4 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 6

SEASON STATS

82
Games
14.3
PPG
3.7
RPG
3.4
APG
1.2
SPG
0.4
BPG
43.4
FG%
33.0
3P%
78.9
FT%
25.8
MPG

GAME LOG

82 games played