IND

2025-26 Season

JAY HUFF

Indiana Pacers | Center | 7-1
Jay Huff
9.5 PPG
4.0 RPG
1.5 APG
21.0 MPG
-1.2 Impact

Huff produces at an below average rate for a 21-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-1.2
Scoring +8.4
Points 9.5 PPG = +6.4
Shot Making above expected FG% = +2.0
Creation +0.5
Creation 1.5 AST/g = +0.5
Turnovers -2.3
Turnovers 0.9/g = -2.3
Defense -0.6
Defense 0.5 STL, 1.9 BLK = -0.6
Hustle & Effort +3.1
Rebounds 4.0 RPG = +3.1
Raw Impact +9.1
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.3
Net Impact
-1.2
32th pctl vs Centers

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 93 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 52th
9.9 PPG
Efficiency 41th
57.9% TS
Playmaking 54th
1.5 APG
Rebounding 18th
4.1 RPG
Defense 68th
+7.6/g
Hustle 22th
+12.7/g
Creation 40th
+2.04/g
Shot Making 63th
+5.83/g
TO Discipline 67th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Jay Huff’s opening stretch of the season was defined by a volatile tug-of-war between elite rim deterrence and maddening perimeter shot selection. Even when his jumper abandoned him, his towering defensive presence often kept his head above water. During the 10/31 vs ATL matchup, he bricked all four of his three-point attempts to finish with just 8 points, yet still posted a +2.3 impact score by flawlessly anchoring the drop coverage and contesting every drive. That trigger-happy offensive approach eventually carried a steep cost. On 11/21 vs CLE, an abysmal 1-for-7 showing from beyond the arc completely torpedoed his elite interior defense, dragging him down to a brutal -4.1 impact. When he actually balanced his outside shot with interior discipline, he looked like a genuine two-way weapon. He finally put the entire package together on 11/29 vs CHI, draining four triples for 14 points while building an absolute wall at the rim to generate a staggering +16.4 impact.

Jay Huff’s middle stretch of the season was defined by a wild, Jekyll-and-Hyde volatility tied directly to his perimeter shot selection. When his jumper abandoned him, he often refused to adapt. Look at the 12/22 vs BOS game, where his stubborn insistence on chucking contested threes resulted in a brutal -9.7 impact score. Yet, he frequently managed to salvage terrible shooting nights by anchoring the paint. During the 12/08 vs SAC matchup, he posted a hefty +9.0 impact score despite scoring just eight points on a miserable 1-for-5 shooting night, strictly because his elite rim protection (+4.0 defensive impact) completely deterred opponent drives. He finally put all the pieces together to close the window. On 01/16 vs NOP, Huff exploded for 29 points on 13-of-17 shooting, earning a monstrous +23.6 impact score by blending inside dominance with lethal floor-spacing.

Jay Huff’s midseason stretch was defined by a maddening tug-of-war between game-wrecking rim protection and self-sabotaging shot selection. When he embraced his role as a defensive anchor, his value skyrocketed regardless of his shooting touch. Look no further than 01/21 vs BOS, where he managed a mere 2 points but still earned a +1.5 impact score because elite interior defense completely salvaged a vanishing offensive night. Conversely, his obsession with the perimeter often bled value. He dropped 16 points on 01/31 vs ATL, yet registered a -2.8 impact score because his distinct inability to anchor the paint defensively served as a hidden cost that erased his scoring gains. He eventually found the perfect balance on 02/20 vs WAS. Operating as an absolute flamethrower from deep, Huff poured in 22 points and generated a massive +13.1 impact score to completely warp the opponent's defensive shell.

Jay Huff’s late-season stretch was defined by a volatile tug-of-war between his elite rim deterrence and wildly erratic perimeter shot selection. Even when his jump shot was falling, defensive lapses could completely erase his value. This was glaringly obvious on Mar 04 vs LAC, where a strong 18-point scoring night still resulted in a -1.1 impact score due to poor execution on the defensive end. Conversely, his sheer size allowed him to dominate games without filling the scoring column. During the Mar 12 vs PHX matchup, Huff managed a meager 10 points while missing all four of his three-point attempts, yet he posted a massive +9.2 impact score simply by anchoring the paint and deterring shots at the rim. When he finally married smart shot selection with his defensive presence, the results were devastating for opponents. He logged a brilliant +12.6 impact score on Mar 25 vs LAL, scoring 18 points on highly efficient 7-for-10 shooting by abandoning bad threes in favor of timely rim-runs. Ultimately, Huff is a massive plus when he plays within himself, but his insistence on settling for low-quality jumpers keeps his overall ceiling tethered to the ground.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Huff's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 54% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Huff consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 3 games. Longest cold streak: 7 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 76 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

M. Raynaud 76.7 poss
FG% 35.7%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 14
J. Hayes 70.0 poss
FG% 70.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 17
J. Embiid 69.3 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.16
PTS 11
N. Vučević 68.6 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 16
M. Diabaté 65.3 poss
FG% 85.7%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 15
N. Queta 63.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 37.5%
PPP 0.2
PTS 13
R. Kalkbrenner 63.8 poss
FG% 30.0%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 15
K. Ware 61.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 11
T. Vukcevic 54.6 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.38
PTS 21
W. Carter Jr. 51.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

N. Vučević 92.3 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 44.4%
PPP 0.24
PTS 22
N. Queta 91.8 poss
FG% 61.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 18
M. Diabaté 87.2 poss
FG% 36.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 14
M. Raynaud 87.2 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 18
J. Hayes 82.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 6
J. Embiid 70.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 37.5%
PPP 0.57
PTS 40
K. Ware 68.8 poss
FG% 36.4%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.15
PTS 10
A. Hukporti 66.4 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 3
R. Kalkbrenner 62.4 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 9
W. Carter Jr. 60.8 poss
FG% 54.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 16

SEASON STATS

82
Games
9.5
PPG
4.0
RPG
1.5
APG
0.5
SPG
1.9
BPG
47.6
FG%
31.9
3P%
82.8
FT%
21.0
MPG

GAME LOG

82 games played