CLE

2025-26 Season

JARRETT ALLEN

Cleveland Cavaliers | Center | 6-9
Jarrett Allen
15.2 PPG
8.4 RPG
1.7 APG
27.0 MPG
+12.6 Impact

Allen produces at an elite rate for a 27-minute workload.

Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+12.6
Scoring +13.7
Points 15.2 PPG = +11.8
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.9
Creation +1.3
Creation 1.7 AST/g = +1.3
Turnovers -3.2
Turnovers 1.3/g = -3.2
Defense +1.1
Defense 1.0 STL, 0.8 BLK = +1.1
Hustle & Effort +8.9
Rebounds 8.4 RPG = +8.9
Raw Impact +21.8
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.2
Net Impact
+12.6
89th pctl vs Centers

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 93 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 80th
15.2 PPG
Efficiency 84th
67.0% TS
Playmaking 63th
1.7 APG
Rebounding 77th
8.4 RPG
Defense 56th
+6.7/g
Hustle 73th
+20.6/g
Creation 84th
+4.06/g
Shot Making 68th
+6.17/g
TO Discipline 53th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Jarrett Allen’s opening stretch of the 2025-26 campaign was defined by overwhelming interior dominance, though maddening bouts of offensive passivity occasionally derailed his rhythm. Look no further than 11/05 vs PHI, where he dropped 24 points and 10 rebounds to generate a staggering +25.5 impact score by pairing elite rim deterrence with total control of his individual post matchups. Yet, his value did not always rely on a heavy scoring burden. During a quiet eight-point outing on 10/26 vs MIL, Allen still posted a +6.8 impact score because his disciplined verticality and relentless work on the offensive glass created crucial extra possessions. The flip side of that coin appeared on 10/22 vs NYK. A failure to establish deep post position resulted in total offensive invisibility, dragging his overall impact down to a -3.1. He remains a devastating two-way anchor, provided he actually remembers to impose his physical advantages on the defense.

A volatile mix of passive offensive outings and utterly destructive interior dominance defined this mid-season stretch for Jarrett Allen. When he hesitated to establish deep position, his overall value plummeted. Look at the 01/12 vs UTA matchup, where blown finishes and a startling lack of aggression resulted in a dismal -5.8 impact score. Yet he frequently salvaged quiet scoring nights through sheer defensive gravity and positional discipline. During a low-volume 10-point performance on 02/04 vs LAC, he generated a stellar +10.4 impact by locking down the painted area and consistently erasing opponent drives. Then came the absolute apex of his season on 02/01 vs POR. Allen completely dismantled the opposing frontcourt with relentless rim-runs, erupting for 40 points and 17 rebounds to post a laughable +47.8 impact score. When he fully commits to imposing his physical will, few big men can match his two-way footprint.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Very consistent. Allen posts positive impact in 84% of games — you almost always get a productive night. Scoring varies by ~7 points, but the overall contribution stays positive.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 93% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Defensive difference-maker. Allen consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: +8.8, second-half: +16.4. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Hot right now — 6 straight games with positive impact. Longest positive run this season: 19 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 55 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

N. Vučević 93.8 poss
FG% 64.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 18
J. Duren 91.6 poss
FG% 64.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 21
R. Kalkbrenner 82.4 poss
FG% 70.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 30
K. Towns 77.0 poss
FG% 83.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 10
M. Williams 73.5 poss
FG% 53.8%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 16
R. Gobert 72.8 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 12
M. Turner 72.0 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 18
J. Embiid 67.8 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 8
K. Ware 60.5 poss
FG% 43.8%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 14
W. Carter Jr. 59.7 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 9

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

R. Kalkbrenner 86.5 poss
FG% 63.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 14
N. Vučević 81.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 12.5%
PPP 0.26
PTS 21
J. Embiid 81.6 poss
FG% 46.2%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.37
PTS 30
J. Duren 81.2 poss
FG% 58.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 21
D. Sharpe 71.5 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 4
R. Gobert 68.4 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 13
M. Williams 64.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 4
W. Carter Jr. 64.0 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 7
K. Ware 61.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 9
K. Towns 53.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 11

SEASON STATS

58
Games
15.2
PPG
8.4
RPG
1.7
APG
1.0
SPG
0.8
BPG
64.0
FG%
10.0
3P%
70.3
FT%
27.0
MPG

GAME LOG

58 games played